Derec
Contributor
I know. The claim is though that asylum seekers have to be admitted. Regular immigration is much more restricted. No country is obligated to accept more migrants than it needs.We don't only accept asylum seekers or political refugees, Derec.
Europe does not need 100,000s of mass migrants per year that are still streaming in through the very porous borders. Certainly not after taking in many millions of (mostly faux) refugees in 2015/16.
Yes, but you have culture/religion that emphasizes having many children. You may even have politics (like among Palestinians) where high birth rate is seen as a weapon against the Jews. It's a much more complex and nuanced issue than economic opportunity.I certainly did not suggest that improving economic conditions would reduce birth rates (although look at the birth rates by socioeconomic status in western nations). I said improving education and economic opportunity. An economist would say that a woman who had a good paying job or any paying job, in some places, faces higher opportunity costs for childbearing than a woman who had no job. The woman with a job would tend to limit the number of children she bears, even reducing the number to zero.