"Almost all terrorists are Muslim" derail split from "Rants"

[Jokodo]

Terrorist attacks against Muslims in the last few days in France including:

Three training grenades thrown at a mosque in Le Man; a bullet hole was also found in one of the mosque windows
A bomb blast at a restaurant adjacent to and associated with a mosque in Villefranche-sur-Saone
Gunshots fired at a mosque in Port-la-Nouvelle

http://www.vox.com/2015/1/10/7524731/french-muslims-attacks-charlie-hebdo

Sweden hit by three arson attacks against mosques within a week: http://news.yahoo.com/sweden-hit-third-mosque-arson-attack-week-145914459.html

Not only is it not true that all terrorists are Muslims, but furthermore there's a considerable amount of anti-Muslim terrorism by non-Muslim Europeans.

I would attack them differently. I would buy half a ton of pork mince then shower the worshippers in a mosque with it!!

So you're expressing tacit approval for terrorist attacks against Muslims (with the only qualifier that you would yourself use a different tactic) 24h hours after once again implying that all terrorists are Muslims.

Does that make you a Muslim?

 

[untermensche]

So you're expressing tacit approval for terrorist attacks against Muslims (with the only qualifier that you would yourself use a different tactic) 24h hours after once again implying that all terrorists are Muslims.

Does that make you a Muslim?

It is telling that he wants to do something nasty to all Muslims, not just Muslims who are violent.

It definitely shows an irrational attitude towards all Muslims.

 

[Warpoet]

I would attack them differently. I would buy half a ton of pork mince then shower the worshippers in a mosque with it!!

So, you think the harassment and assault (via pork or otherwise) of innocent people is OK?

- - - Updated - - -

It is telling that he wants to do something nasty to all Muslims, not just Muslims who are violent.

It definitely shows an irrational attitude towards all Muslims.

They're all guilty, it's just a matter of degree. Haven't you heard?

 

[laughing dog]

Timothy McVeigh.

Chicken feed compared to muslim atrocities.

And to IDF atrocities and US drone attacks. But none of that is a relevant response.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Timothy McVeigh.

Chicken feed compared to muslim atrocities.

It's a valid rebuttal, though--you went too far and said "all".

 

[untermensche]

This latest attack in Paris is chicken feed compared to real terrorist attacks like the US invasion of Iraq that resulted in the destruction of a nation, caused millions to flee in terror, and has lasted years with no end in sight.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

This latest attack in Paris is chicken feed compared to real terrorist attacks like the US invasion of Iraq that resulted in the destruction of a nation, caused millions to flee in terror, and has lasted years with no end in sight.

1) You have repeatedly shown you do not know what the word "terrorism" means.

2) The primary damage in Iraq wasn't from the US at all but from Shia/Sunni religious violence.

 

[Crazy Eddie]

Dead civilian all over the place. Civilians captured and tortured.

Those are the actions we are looking at.

Those aren't actions. Those are casualties.

HOW and WHERE were the civilians killed, and by whom? What weapons were used? How were the weapons deployed against those civilians? All of this just for starters. When you examine the actions of combatants in context, it is not actually difficult to figure out what their objective was.

You have given no reasonable way to decide.

You DO realize that a strawman argument isn't convincing to the person you're using against... right?