Keith&Co.
Contributor
- Joined
- Mar 31, 2006
- Messages
- 22,444
- Location
- Far Western Mass
- Gender
- Here.
- Basic Beliefs
- I'm here...
Eh, never mind.
Last edited:
I'd reply, but that would just string this along.Fine. I'll say it.
The tampon market had been stuck for a long time, but it is now expanding.
The subtraction of a symbol from a product lineup is not the source of the outrage. It's the reasoning behind the subtraction, and the implications of that.
The subtraction of a symbol from a product lineup is not the source of the outrage. It's the reasoning behind the subtraction, and the implications of that.
So what, in your opinion, is the reasoning and implications?
The subtraction of a symbol from a product lineup is not the source of the outrage. It's the reasoning behind the subtraction, and the implications of that.
So what, in your opinion, is the reasoning and implications?
Cash flow was too light.
Maybe he's padding his resume to the max?Cash flow was too light.
I think you're just stringing me along.
"Always announced it will remove the Venus symbol from its menstruation products packaging following calls by transgender advocates, who said its parent, Procter & Gamble, was alienating trans and gender-nonconforming customers by not acknowledging that they, too, can experience menstruation."
“Could someone from Always tell me why it is imperative to have the female symbol on their sanitary products?” Twitter user Melly Bloom, one of those advocates, tweeted over the summer. “There are non-binary and trans folks who still need to use your products too you know!”
https://www.nbcnews.com/feature/nbc...e-symbol-sanitary-products-packaging-n1069721
More insanity from leftists. A trans woman can not have a period because they are a man! Therefore, the product is for FEMALES, not MALES. Very simple. Saying, "Men can have periods!" is just downright anti-science. They are not men having periods, they are women having periods.
Just who the hell do these leftists SJW's think they are? These people are so offended and outraged at everything that they have to force a company to cater to less than 1% of the population. Why can't they just buy the product with a female logo on it without being offended? The product is the same, they didn't change it. Just go into the store and buy it. Why do they need changed labels before they can be comfortable buying something?
The snowflake generation has really gone to new heights. God help us all. Think about the anti-Christian agenda. A company will cater to trans people but Starbucks refuses to write "Merry Christmas!" on their cups because they don't want to cater to Christians. Even though the majority of people in this country are Christian, it's a big no-no to say "Merry Christmas!" Cater to trans, ignore Christians. Pretty sick agenda here.
"God help us"?
Really?
"God help us"?
Are you even a real Christian? Do you even know what the 1st commandment is? Here is a refresher...
THOU SHALT HAVE NO OTHER GOD BEFORE ME!
And here you are... upset... that some company is taking a PAGAN symbol off of their product.
Maybe you need a little bit of introspection to think about this topic a little bit. As a Christian, not as a conservative talking point regurgitator. Are you REALLY upset that pagan symbols are disappearing from popular consumer products? I mean that extra paragraph you added to the end of your OP should have tickled some sort of cognitive dissonance... but ... I guess that I STILL expect too much from you.
It's still totally about money. Period.
You guys should quit ragging on Half Life so much. Its getting to be pretty bloody awful!
You guys should quit ragging on Half Life so much. Its getting to be pretty bloody awful!
The subtraction of a symbol from a product lineup is not the source of the outrage. It's the reasoning behind the subtraction, and the implications of that.
So what, in your opinion, is the reasoning and implications?