My guess would be "they're not OK with it" but when asked "so what did you do as a result of your not-ok-ness," the answer has always been *crickets*.I better not see Bomb Hashtag 30 talk bout some old "don't blame me for what people did in the past" all while being ok with similar rubbish being done now.
Are you asking to become educated about the effects of these laws or are you implicitly suggesting they have no effect? If it is the latter, why on earth do you care about anyone complaining about nothing?How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?Then why do you care about CRT at all? Why aren't you equally waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum before you start posting in a CRT thread? What makes its potential Marxistness different from anything else about it?I'm waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum from Kindergarten to 12th grade before I start ... whether its Marxist or not. That's just me.
I care because Republican law makers are making laws that are effecting everyone to prevent something that didn't happen to anyone.
So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?I mean, what is wrong with politicians passing legislation to protect us from something that doesn't exist, that they say exists. That isn't remotely Orwellian.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?Then why do you care about CRT at all? Why aren't you equally waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum before you start posting in a CRT thread? What makes its potential Marxistness different from anything else about it?I'm waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum from Kindergarten to 12th grade before I start ... whether its Marxist or not. That's just me.
I care because Republican law makers are making laws that are effecting everyone to prevent something that didn't happen to anyone.
We are talking about CRT, a Law School level subject of education. I have no idea what the heck you are trying to try and juxtaposition with CRT.So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?I mean, what is wrong with politicians passing legislation to protect us from something that doesn't exist, that they say exists. That isn't remotely Orwellian.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?
I don't think they're stupid.
I just think they're dishonest
My dude, can we agree that segregating students by race and treating children based on their skin color is wrong? Don't care what you want to call it; can we agree it is wrong?We are talking about CRT, a Law School level subject of education. I have no idea what the heck you are trying to try and juxtaposition with CRT.So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?I mean, what is wrong with politicians passing legislation to protect us from something that doesn't exist, that they say exists. That isn't remotely Orwellian.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?
I expect some people are just hopelessly lost, and were always going to be. I accept that. Still, this is endemic to the human genome, yet we don't see this as a rule across the population. It can be mitigated and instead of "stupid" express as other more productive concepts nearby to it.I don't think they're stupid.
You don’t think the stupidest 10-15 of the electorate is stupid? Compared to what?
Yeah, there are people who spout that men can get pregnant. Lots of stupid in the world.I expect some people are just hopelessly lost
Oh, I have yet to see you define "man". Are we back to that? There's a thread for it. But here you are on your hobby horse.Yeah, there are people who spout that men can get pregnant. Lots of stupid in the world.I expect some people are just hopelessly lost
So you've got nothing.My dude, can we agree that segregating students by race and treating children based on their skin color is wrong? Don't care what you want to call it; can we agree it is wrong?We are talking about CRT, a Law School level subject of education. I have no idea what the heck you are trying to try and juxtaposition with CRT.
So you favor racial discrimination in schools? M'kay.So you've got nothing.My dude, can we agree that segregating students by race and treating children based on their skin color is wrong? Don't care what you want to call it; can we agree it is wrong?We are talking about CRT, a Law School level subject of education. I have no idea what the heck you are trying to try and juxtaposition with CRT.
How America got to the point where schools are no longer segregated and you still have this question is beyond me.So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?I mean, what is wrong with politicians passing legislation to protect us from something that doesn't exist, that they say exists. That isn't remotely Orwellian.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?Then why do you care about CRT at all? Why aren't you equally waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum before you start posting in a CRT thread? What makes its potential Marxistness different from anything else about it?I'm waiting for evidence of CRT being a part of the public school curriculum from Kindergarten to 12th grade before I start ... whether its Marxist or not. That's just me.
I care because Republican law makers are making laws that are effecting everyone to prevent something that didn't happen to anyone.
Do you have an example of this or is this another "CRT in Kindergarten" type thing?So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?
It's a quick internet search.Do you have an example of this or is this another "CRT in Kindergarten" type thing?So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?
Oh, I have read about them. The memberships are completely voluntary. Like the computer club or robotics club.It's a quick internet search.Do you have an example of this or is this another "CRT in Kindergarten" type thing?So is there agreement that schools should not segregate students in racial "affnity groups" and that the color of student's skin should not be a focus of education?
They claim they are prohibiting CRT, but they write laws vague enough that it's clear that it's really about prohibiting teaching the unpleasant bits of history.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?
*Alarm bells ringing*They claim they are prohibiting CRT, but they write laws vague enough that it's clear that it's really about prohibiting teaching the unpleasant bits of history.How are their laws affecting everyone? Are they prohibiting CRT, and if so are the courts mistaking something else for CRT? Or are they prohibiting something other than CRT?