beero1000
Veteran Member
I think this entire debate hinges on the question of whether people are just really complicated biological machines. If the answer is yes, then there is no reason to deny that a sufficiently advanced robot could theoretically perform any task that a human can.
Talking about 'humanity' as part of the action is a philosophical argument on whether or not true AI should be considered people, not whether or not the job can be automated.
Talking about 'humanity' as part of the action is a philosophical argument on whether or not true AI should be considered people, not whether or not the job can be automated.