• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

China-Bashing

Policy toward China should be:

  • Reduce trade barriers, promote more trade and competition.

    Votes: 2 50.0%
  • Protect our jobs, reduce trade, punish China for unfair practices.

    Votes: 2 50.0%

  • Total voters
    4

Lumpenproletariat

Veteran Member
Joined
May 9, 2014
Messages
2,570
Basic Beliefs
---- "Just the facts, ma'am, just the facts."
Increase trade with China

or

Tighten the screws on China to punish them for stealing our jobs


Will someone say what the real threat is from China, beyond the usual China-bashing rhetoric. Here is an NBC news item which mostly refutes the claim that China is buying up too much U.S. land:





Here are some of the alleged threats from China, and almost all seem to be phony or are gross exaggerations:

Slave labor
The truth is that those "slaves" are better off than they would be -- and the world is better off -- from anything gained by retaliating with sanctions, boycotts, embargoes against China. Of course every country, including the U.S., has its alleged "slave" labor conditions, and those same conditions existed in Britain and the U.S. 100 or 200 years ago when the economy was less developed than it is now. I.e., more science and improved production/technology, plus more competition, leads to higher standards, whereas economic retaliation against a country only produces net harm, not net benefit.

And U.S. real slave labor before the Civil War was far worse than Chinese "slave" labor today, and yet this did not make the U.S. a threat to other countries against which they needed to retaliate.


Unfair Competition
Chinese anticompetitive Protectionism is more harmful to China than it is to the U.S. The U.S. benefits from the lower labor cost of products from China, regardless of tougher competition to U.S. companies/workers. Those companies can adjust and become more competitive, to the benefit of U.S. consumers. Only serving consumers matters, not providing "jobs" out of pity to workers who can't compete with Chinese workers.


Violation of Intellectual Property Rights
The U.S. can steal Chinese technology just as easily as China can steal U.S. technology, as long as there's no agreement on this between the two countries. In the 19th century U.S. companies stole technology from British companies, but that did not make the U.S. a threat to Britain or other countries. Peacefully establishing patent and copyright protection would work better for both countries, but there's no reason to see China as a threat just because it does something many countries have done routinely, including the U.S., when they don't have agreements to promote proper competition.


Buying up too much U.S. land
This is debunked in the NBC news item above. But also, even if China should buy excess U.S. land, this is no threat as long as the appropriate property taxes are in place. Most of this land is UNDERtaxed, and also taxed inappropriately. The danger is not only from another country, but also from corporations/investors who accumulate more land (speculate in land more heavily). The solution is a PROGRESSIVE property tax on all landowners, foreign and domestic, so those who accumulate more land pay a higher tax rate.


Trade Imbalance / Trade Surplus/Deficit
There is no evidence that a trade deficit is bad for the economy. The trade-deficit paranoia is based on Snake-Oil Economics only, not on any evidence or facts of economics to show harm from a trade imbalance. A trade deficit may be a RESULT of some flaw in the economy which is harmful, such as inefficient production, but not a cause of any harm or flaw in the economy.


Military threat / Taiwan
This is the only possible real threat. It is better addressed by increasing trade and reducing the economic China-Bashing paranoia.


Omissions? What other threats are posed by China? to the U.S. or other countries?
 
Last edited:
Intellectual property: We have an awful lot more for them to steal than they have for us to steal.
 
Slave labor
The truth is that those "slaves" are better off than they would be -- and the world is better off -- from anything gained by retaliating with sanctions, boycotts, embargoes against China. ...
Dismissing forced labor of thousands as "it could be worse" and justifying it because it makes the world materially better off is so morally depraved it boggles the mind.
 
Interesting re: progressive property taxes. Not sure how that will be enforced.

In general I find I do have an increasingly negative bias against foreign nationals and foreign entities purchasing real estate in the US. I know that many countries put serious restrictions on such and I can see why.

In the US as well as many other places, there is an increasing issue with the in affordability of housing. Purchases by foreign nationals does not help the situation. China has vast land that it can develop its own.
 
Intellectual property: We have an awful lot more for them to steal than they have for us to steal.
Take.

Taking something unsecured isn't stealing, unless it's unlawful in the jurisdiction in which the taking occurs.

That you characterise their behaviour as stealing says a lot about your unconscious assumptions, and nothing at all about China.
 
Intellectual property: We have an awful lot more for them to steal than they have for us to steal.
Take.

Taking something unsecured isn't stealing, unless it's unlawful in the jurisdiction in which the taking occurs.

That you characterise their behaviour as stealing says a lot about your unconscious assumptions, and nothing at all about China.
Yes it is. As pointed out to you before, China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP. But they ignore and flaunt those rules regularly. It is both illegal and a threat to our and Australian National Security.
 
What's wrong with doing what works?
rather than sanctions, boycotts, and embargoes?

Intellectual property: We have an awful lot more for them to steal than they have for us to steal.
Take.

Taking something unsecured isn't stealing, unless it's unlawful in the jurisdiction in which the taking occurs.

That you characterise their behaviour as stealing says a lot about your unconscious assumptions, and nothing at all about China.
Yes it is. As pointed out to you before, China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP. But they ignore and flaunt those rules regularly. It is both illegal and a threat to our and Australian National Security.
Let's assume the above is factually correct: International agreements are violated by China when it "steals" intellectual property.

Of course we all know that an "international agreement" is only a piece of paper in which the prohibited acts in it are virtual announcements of what the signing countries are going to do anyway in violation of what the paper says they promise not to do. Virtually all signatories do violate the terms, as the U.S. violates them along with the other countries.

But let's even assume that "international agreements" are sacred documents we sign in good faith sincerely pledging to follow the commitments made, and that these agreements are to be enforced with "every fiber of our being" etc. Even then, the punishment of BOYCOTTS, SANCTIONS, and EMBARGOES (BSE) never works, or almost never, and only makes everyone worse off, including the countries imposing these punishments.


Where have BSE punishments ever worked?

The classic case cited, the ONLY one (unless someone can name another) is the boycott against South Africa, which apparently pressured that country to end its Apartheid policies.

This apparently worked, but ----

only because a large majority of countries united together to enforce this boycott. A good rule is that it requires something like 70-80% of all countries (or all large ones) to cooperate with the boycott and enforce it.

What about all the other cases of sanctions, boycotts and embargoes? They all fail. There's no evidence that any of them have succeeded. A classic example is the U.S. embargo on Cuba, which does nothing other than make both Cuba and the U.S. worse off, because both countries would benefit with opening up full travel and trade between the countries. The Cubans, both government and general population have wanted it to end, seeing no benefit and nothing to improve the conditions to make the evils disappear. Cuba's mistakes would be corrected better (though gradually) by opening up normal ties.

The evils of China have been reduced, over 50+ years, as a result of the integration of China into trade with the U.S. and other nations. Just because it has not become perfect and abolished all evil does not mean there's been no improvement. Similar success has come from South Korea being integrated into world trade, in a nation which struggled through periods of tyranny and oppression before reaching its current result of prosperity and democracy. This required generations to accomplish, without aggressive sanctions and boycotts and embargoes.

The free trade agreements also are violated by most of the signatories, which is why Unilateral Free Trade would be more realistic and do-able, by the U.S. or Great Britain or other nation by itself, without demanding reciprocation, improving its economy through trade and competition and gradually persuading other nations to grow up and open their market, without the ongoing "trade wars" and other hostility and pseudo-patriotic nationalism preached by demagogues in those countries, appealing to the Populist nativist and racist impulses of the mindless masses who attend rallies where they worship their cult-like "leaders" preaching their hate and Snake-Oil Economics.
 
Refer to Uyghurs, Tibet, Hong Kong, and the South China Sea.
Regarding Uyghurs, the whole thing is a complete fabrication and westen provocation.

China is authoritarian state, that's true. But 99.9% chinese are fine with it.
The CCP's social credit system isn't something I'd want to live under....
From western expats, it does not exist, never existed. It's western propaganda invention.
 
China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP.
True, but it's cultural thing. They just never had it in their culture and "steal" IP from each other without any consequence. That's annoying.
Western countries did it too, as recently as 70s and computers and chips in general were not protected.
Companies were free to copy everything.
 
Refer to Uyghurs, Tibet, Hong Kong, and the South China Sea.
Regarding Uyghurs, the whole thing is a complete fabrication and westen provocation.

China is authoritarian state, that's true. But 99.9% chinese are fine with it.
The CCP's social credit system isn't something I'd want to live under....
From western expats, it does not exist, never existed. It's western propaganda invention.

I don't think so. The information comes out of China, including examples of those who were disadvantaged by it.
 
China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP.
True, but it's cultural thing. They just never had it in their culture and "steal" IP from each other without any consequence. That's annoying.
Western countries did it too, as recently as 70s and computers and chips in general were not protected.
Companies were free to copy everything.
No. IP treaties existed back then too.

The issue isn’t simply stealing IP. Sure that happened and happens now. But in western countries you can be pretty sure that you have the protections of a legal system that will not rubber stamp what the host company has done. Indeed there are a variety of enforcement mechanisms and avenues of relief. This is not the case for China where it is the government itself that is the business.

And it’s not government policies necessarily that are at issue. But why would any company that values its IP do business in a country that won’t protect it? IP protections are essential for all modern businesses. It’s absurd to think that it can be ignored.
 
Interesting re: progressive property taxes. Not sure how that will be enforced.

In general I find I do have an increasingly negative bias against foreign nationals and foreign entities purchasing real estate in the US. I know that many countries put serious restrictions on such and I can see why.

In the US as well as many other places, there is an increasing issue with the in affordability of housing. Purchases by foreign nationals does not help the situation. China has vast land that it can develop its own.
Directly, it doesn't actually matter. Whether a local investor or a foreign investor owns the house makes no difference to the supply of real estate.

What is a problem is that much of the foreign investment is money fleeing to a place of safety and bids up the price of housing in the affected cities. The Chinese especially have an obsession with real estate as a store of value (and their own market is horribly overpriced--rental rates nowhere near justify the sale prices) and the flow of money into our cities is an issue.

The moron in Florida is going about it totally wrong, though--Chinese citizens can be here as permanent residents and those aren't the problem. Rather it's non-owner-occupied real estate that's the issue.
 
Intellectual property: We have an awful lot more for them to steal than they have for us to steal.
Take.

Taking something unsecured isn't stealing, unless it's unlawful in the jurisdiction in which the taking occurs.

That you characterise their behaviour as stealing says a lot about your unconscious assumptions, and nothing at all about China.
So I'm free to distribute copies of your book and not pay you royalties?
 
Refer to Uyghurs, Tibet, Hong Kong, and the South China Sea.
Regarding Uyghurs, the whole thing is a complete fabrication and westen provocation.
Far too much direct evidence to say it's a fabrication.

China is authoritarian state, that's true. But 99.9% chinese are fine with it.
Observation: Many people are unwilling to talk about any subject matter that might be politically sensitive. I've noticed it with every family member that speaks enough English that I could hold a reasonable conversation with them. They know I'm family, it has always happened in private real estate, not hotel rooms that would be easily bugged. Those are not the actions of people who are fine with it. While it has never been with family I have seen the same unwillingness to talk in Burma (now Myanmar) and behind the Iron Curtain. It may be normal and unnoticeable for you but to those of us in free societies it stands out.
 
China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP.
True, but it's cultural thing. They just never had it in their culture and "steal" IP from each other without any consequence. That's annoying.
Western countries did it too, as recently as 70s and computers and chips in general were not protected.
Companies were free to copy everything.
Theft was generally not a big factor before everything was digital.
 
China is a party to multiple international agreements concerning IP.
True, but it's cultural thing. They just never had it in their culture and "steal" IP from each other without any consequence. That's annoying.
Western countries did it too, as recently as 70s and computers and chips in general were not protected.
Companies were free to copy everything.
Theft was generally not a big factor before everything was digital.
How do you know?
China has always had problem with corruption (theft) and all kind of scams. CCP could not solve it.
It's part of culture. And it takes generations to change that.
Take Taiwan for example. It took generations indirect (through puppet dictators) US rule to make them have "western" style "democracy".
They got there only recently and we can't be sure how reliable they are, it all could be just a result of constant american managing.

South Korea and even Japan are not exactly western style democracies.
Hell, even US is not really that great democracy. US is really an oligarchate.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom