• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Chronicles in socialist success stories: Poll: most voters say they're open to a political revolution to redistribute wealth

ksen

Contributor
Joined
Jun 10, 2005
Messages
6,540
Location
Florida
Basic Beliefs
Calvinist
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/3/10904988/bernie-sanders-political-revolution-poll

Fifty-four percent of respondents to our online poll — which reached a sample of 1,884 registered voters nationally from Friday, January 29, through Sunday, January 31, 2016 — agreed that a "political revolution might be necessary to redistribute money from the wealthiest Americans to the middle class." Just 30 percent said they disagreed. (Morning Consult Intelligence members can head to their site to view the poll's full toplines and crosstabs.)

Liberals and liberal-leaning demographics were most likely to agree with the statement. But majorities of independents, white voters, evangelicals, and even Tea Party supporters in our sample agreed too — showing that redistribution may no longer be a dirty word in American politics.

So how close to November should I start stockpiling toilet paper and powdered milk?
 
I'd hurry, before the runs start....and get some Imodium as well.
 
Ya, but this is a revolution by Americans. The key characteristic they're looking for in a battle is the ability for them to sit on the couch and do nothing while success magically happens without the need to put in any effort.

I don't think that any of the elites are particarly quaking in their boots at the prospect of nothing more than some snarky tweets coming their way.
 
Ya, but this is a revolution by Americans. The key characteristic they're looking for in a battle is the ability for them to sit on the couch and do nothing while success magically happens without the need to put in any effort.

I don't think that any of the elites are particarly quaking in their boots at the prospect of nothing more than some snarky tweets coming their way.
Quit describing reality!
 
So how close to November should I start stockpiling toilet paper and powdered milk?

I get why you need the toilet paper when you stroke off to your revolution fetish porn, but not the powdered milk.
 
http://www.vox.com/2016/2/3/10904988/bernie-sanders-political-revolution-poll

Fifty-four percent of respondents to our online poll — which reached a sample of 1,884 registered voters nationally from Friday, January 29, through Sunday, January 31, 2016 — agreed that a "political revolution might be necessary to redistribute money from the wealthiest Americans to the middle class." Just 30 percent said they disagreed. (Morning Consult Intelligence members can head to their site to view the poll's full toplines and crosstabs.)

Liberals and liberal-leaning demographics were most likely to agree with the statement. But majorities of independents, white voters, evangelicals, and even Tea Party supporters in our sample agreed too — showing that redistribution may no longer be a dirty word in American politics.

So how close to November should I start stockpiling toilet paper and powdered milk?

It's would be a dirty word among most of the 46 percent getting "redistributed".

Perhaps its time for an update on the old metaphor: 54 wolves and 46 sheep are vote on what's on the menu for dinner. 54 votes are for mutton, 30 for grass, and 16 are not sure.

Who needs a revolution?
 
"Redistribution" sounds like someone owes you. As if all assets are community assets, and some are hording assets which belong to all. It seems an Orwellian turn of phrase meant to replace what had usually been simply called jealously or envy.
 
I don't think that any of the elites are particarly quaking in their boots at the prospect of nothing more than some snarky tweets coming their way.

http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/lloyd-blankfein-bernie-sanders-218689

The head of Goldman Sachs said on Wednesday that Bernie Sanders' insurgent candidacy "has the potential to be a dangerous moment."

Lloyd Blankfein, who is chairman and CEO of the bank, was speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

In January, Sanders was asked by Bloomberg Politics to list an example of corporate greed, and he listed Blankfein.

“I don’t take it personally since we never met," Blankfein responded.

But he added that Sanders' attacks on the "billionaire class" and bankers could be dangerous.

:unsure:
 
Video capture of liberals voting for redistribution of body parts:

[youtube]https://youtu.be/dY4V3UUY95A?t=7[/youtube]
 
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/02/lloyd-blankfein-bernie-sanders-218689

The head of Goldman Sachs said on Wednesday that Bernie Sanders' insurgent candidacy "has the potential to be a dangerous moment."

Lloyd Blankfein, who is chairman and CEO of the bank, was speaking to CNBC’s “Squawk Box.”

In January, Sanders was asked by Bloomberg Politics to list an example of corporate greed, and he listed Blankfein.

“I don’t take it personally since we never met," Blankfein responded.

But he added that Sanders' attacks on the "billionaire class" and bankers could be dangerous.

:unsure:

If only voters had some way of showing support for this Sanders fellow.
 
It's would be a dirty word among most of the 46 percent getting "redistributed".

Perhaps its time for an update on the old metaphor: 54 wolves and 46 sheep are vote on what's on the menu for dinner. 54 votes are for mutton, 30 for grass, and 16 are not sure.

Who needs a revolution?
Well, 16 sheep might need a revolution in order to get a moment of clarity out of it. 54 wolves aren't voting to have 46 sheep for dinner, just one sheep. When they come for one sheep, 16 sheep will say nothing because they aren't that one sheep. Then when they come for two sheep, 16 sheep will still say nothing, because they aren't those two sheep.
 
"Redistribution" sounds like someone owes you. As if all assets are community assets, and some are hording assets which belong to all. It seems an Orwellian turn of phrase meant to replace what had usually been simply called jealously or envy.
I never realized that fair economic opportunity was synonymous with 'jealousy or envy'.
 
"Redistribution" sounds like someone owes you. As if all assets are community assets, and some are hording assets which belong to all. It seems an Orwellian turn of phrase meant to replace what had usually been simply called jealously or envy.
I never realized that fair economic opportunity was synonymous with 'jealousy or envy'.

What is fair about stealing someone else's stuff?
 
Depends on your income level.

Please elaborate.

What is the level that it would be considered stealing? Sanders would have it so that they pay close to half their income. But remember, that 100% paycheck you get is just really the governments and you are just lucky to keep any of it.
 
Back
Top Bottom