Swammerdami
Squadron Leader
Well, this is something new! Mr. Swizzle makes a post on climate change in which he provides about a DOZEN complete sentences! Still not QUITE ready for submission to a journal, but it's a big improvement over his usual, repeating the same tired memes over and over: "Rapture-like rapture-like Santa Monica rapture-like."
Most of us link to research papers (or articles about papers) by actual scientists. It's not clear where you get your ideas.
True enough! While severe fluctuations do not of themselves make an "apocalypse" -- and do start a thread in Elsewhere if you need help defining this emotion-laden word -- things really are scarier than many of us (not restricted to Deniers like yourself) understand. Edwards Air Force Base is experiencing temperatures higher than any recorded before 2024, but I assigned you that field trip just because it's a short drive from Santa Monica. High temperatures are being recorded all over the world. There have been major changes in ecology on land and sea, blamed on climate change.
Glaciers are disappearing faster than expected. Do you know about albedo feedback, @TSwizzle ?
The 24-hour cycle is the most obvious example of HUGE short-period temperature cycling! The 12-month cycle is also very big. In terms of their effects on temperature these cycles dwarf quasi-periodic cycles like the "Southern Oscillation" or the Schwabe sunspot cycle, let alone the three Milankovitch cycles. Wow! And that's before we even speak of APERIODIC changes. Guess what? Climate and its changes are COMPLICATED. (Most of you already know this, but I'm giving TSwizzle a chance to show off his knowledge before unhiding the Spoiler.)
Where @TSwizzle loses the plot is with APERIODIC changes. We've posted graphs for him over and over but to no avail. So I'll just throw out a meme word: Hockeystick! Where do you stand on the Hockeystick, Mr. Swiz? Corrupt climatologists scrounging for dimes? Feminist hussies trying to get elected to public office? Gates and Soros looking for more excuses to test their nanobots? Or is your grasp of the math term "periodic" so weak you consider the Hockeystick to be part of a "period"?
This is a sincere question. You brag about your superior knowledge but don't link to the peer-reviewed journals where you get your information.
You post propaganda created by activists. The last one you posted was junk.
Most of us link to research papers (or articles about papers) by actual scientists. It's not clear where you get your ideas.
Climate is variable. Just because you see some fluctuations does not mean an there is an apocalypse.
True enough! While severe fluctuations do not of themselves make an "apocalypse" -- and do start a thread in Elsewhere if you need help defining this emotion-laden word -- things really are scarier than many of us (not restricted to Deniers like yourself) understand. Edwards Air Force Base is experiencing temperatures higher than any recorded before 2024, but I assigned you that field trip just because it's a short drive from Santa Monica. High temperatures are being recorded all over the world. There have been major changes in ecology on land and sea, blamed on climate change.
Glaciers are disappearing faster than expected. Do you know about albedo feedback, @TSwizzle ?
The earth warms and cools in cycles and has done since forever. Man has very little impact on climate. This obsession with CO2 needs to stop.
The 24-hour cycle is the most obvious example of HUGE short-period temperature cycling! The 12-month cycle is also very big. In terms of their effects on temperature these cycles dwarf quasi-periodic cycles like the "Southern Oscillation" or the Schwabe sunspot cycle, let alone the three Milankovitch cycles. Wow! And that's before we even speak of APERIODIC changes. Guess what? Climate and its changes are COMPLICATED. (Most of you already know this, but I'm giving TSwizzle a chance to show off his knowledge before unhiding the Spoiler.)
Where @TSwizzle loses the plot is with APERIODIC changes. We've posted graphs for him over and over but to no avail. So I'll just throw out a meme word: Hockeystick! Where do you stand on the Hockeystick, Mr. Swiz? Corrupt climatologists scrounging for dimes? Feminist hussies trying to get elected to public office? Gates and Soros looking for more excuses to test their nanobots? Or is your grasp of the math term "periodic" so weak you consider the Hockeystick to be part of a "period"?
This is a sincere question. You brag about your superior knowledge but don't link to the peer-reviewed journals where you get your information.