• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Climate Change(d)?

Once again, how many carbon emissions are emitted by the burning of fossil fuels vs how much is burning naturally? Got an answer for that? Nope, you don't. And you're not even going to bother to check, unlike the people who spend years studying this stuff.

This obsession with carbon needs to stop. Of course it won’t because you are brainwashed into believing burning “fossil fuels” and CO2 is the cause of all climate change.

Anyway, I’m done with this tedious treadmill.
 
The great Tswizzle who... thinks it's bad to have blue hair, knows more than experts who have PhDs.
 
By the way what even is your educational background, Tswizzle? Trichology?
 
The great Tswizzle who... thinks it's bad to have blue hair, knows more than experts who have PhDs.

You haven’t noticed there is a type to the climate activists that glue themselves to the road or block traffic? Usually over-fed lesbians with blue hair, pierced wearing flannel shirts and dungarees accompanied by effeminate soy boys who haven’t been laid.
 
The great Tswizzle who... thinks it's bad to have blue hair, knows more than experts who have PhDs.

You haven’t noticed there is a type to the climate activists that glue themselves to the road or block traffic? Usually over-fed lesbians with blue hair, pierced wearing flannel shirts and dungarees accompanied by effeminate soy boys who haven’t been laid.
Yet we're supposed to believe you know more than people with PhDs when you post this hillbilly tripe? Everyone here already knew what you are though (besides the naive "I'm not a conservative but agree mostly with conservatives" people).
 
Last edited:
The great Tswizzle who... thinks it's bad to have blue hair, knows more than experts who have PhDs.

You haven’t noticed there is a type to the climate activists that glue themselves to the road or block traffic? Usually over-fed lesbians with blue hair, pierced wearing flannel shirts and dungarees accompanied by effeminate soy boys who haven’t been laid.
Yet we're supposed to believe you know more than people with PhDs when you post this hillbilly tripe?

Eh? I’m not trying to make you or anyone else believe anything, fella.
Everyone here already knew what you are though (besides the naive "I'm not a conservative but agree mostly with conservatives" people).

Sure, Jan.
 
Once again, how many carbon emissions are emitted by the burning of fossil fuels vs how much is burning naturally? Got an answer for that? Nope, you don't. And you're not even going to bother to check, unlike the people who spend years studying this stuff.

This obsession with carbon needs to stop. Of course it won’t because you are brainwashed into believing burning “fossil fuels” and CO2 is the cause of all climate change.

Anyway, I’m done with this tedious treadmill.

Co2 isn’t the cause of all climate change, but it is a greenhouse gas and it does retain heat......
 
Once again, how many carbon emissions are emitted by the burning of fossil fuels vs how much is burning naturally? Got an answer for that? Nope, you don't. And you're not even going to bother to check, unlike the people who spend years studying this stuff.

This obsession with carbon needs to stop. Of course it won’t because you are brainwashed into believing burning “fossil fuels” and CO2 is the cause of all climate change.

Anyway, I’m done with this tedious treadmill.

Co2 isn’t the cause of all climate change, but it is a greenhouse gas and it does retain heat......
He would also know scientists don't claim Co2 is the cause of all climate change. If he understood science. Oddly he's still acting the same way Creationists do when they lie about science. 🤔
 
Last edited:
The great Tswizzle who... thinks it's bad to have blue hair, knows more than experts who have PhDs.

You haven’t noticed there is a type to the climate activists that glue themselves to the road or block traffic? Usually over-fed lesbians with blue hair, pierced wearing flannel shirts and dungarees accompanied by effeminate soy boys who haven’t been laid.
Finally showing your true colors? Or a weak attempt to divert discussion from your ignorance. Very Trump like.

And there is a kind of activist who rioted inside the US capital leading to several deaths.

Fat lesbians? You won't get a rise out of me, but you must be getting desperate.

You are still not making any arguments that dispute the actual science ad measurements, the hallmark of the anti climate science activists like you.

It mist be tough to be fearful of those dangerous intimidating fat lesbians in a progressive state like California.
 
Last edited:
One of the world's leading ice experts has predicted the final collapse of Arctic sea ice in summer months within four years. In what he calls a "global disaster" now unfolding in northern latitudes as the sea area that freezes and melts each year shrinks to its lowest extent ever recorded, Prof Peter Wadhams of Cambridge University calls for "urgent" consideration of new ideas to reduce global temperatures. “This collapse, I predicted would occur in 2015-16 at which time the summer Arctic (August to September) would become ice-free. The final collapse towards that state is now happening and will probably be complete by those dates".

Teh Gruaniad

Oops!
 
Still not "done with these tedious responses".
 
It'd be helpful if at some point they stuck to a line of argument. It goes from:

1) There has been no change at all
2) The change we've seen can be a natural deviation (and it presumably can go back down shortly)
3) The change won't result in the apocalypse as predicted by... people
4) *roll eyes*
 
It'd be helpful if at some point they stuck to a line of argument. It goes from:

1) There has been no change at all
2) The change we've seen can be a natural deviation (and it presumably can go back down shortly)
3) The change won't result in the apocalypse as predicted by... people
4) *roll eyes*
5. Fat lesbians
 
lol, you lot are like flat earth conspiracy theorists.

May I hijack the thread to ask a serious question? What constitutes an "insult"?

Is the above quote by Mr. Swizz an "insult"? Elsewhere I wrote that Mr. Swizz "seems stupid [but actually isn't]." Was mine an insult while Swizz's isn't just because "stupid" is an insulting word, while none of the words in the above quote is, individually, an "insulting word"?
 
Back
Top Bottom