taxpayer funded room
He's also the decider of that.
taxpayer funded room
What annoys me is that Acosta's story got all the attention when personally I think something else even more interesting happened at that press conference.
What annoys me is that Acosta's story got all the attention when personally I think something else even more interesting happened at that press conference.
I am not sure why that annoys you, but you are correct about the conference and incorrect about the downstream consequences. That is, Acosta got press credentials removed for WH but the earlier person did not.
He just can't hold press conferences in the White House.
Vague
Vague
Ah, so you don't know what I was referring to.
Vague
Ah, so you don't know what I was referring to.
How did you figure that out?
taxpayer funded room
He's also the decider of that.
But the White House also instituted new rules for journalists at press conferences, claiming it has the right to suspend or revoke a journalist's credentials if they fail to follow any of the rules. Those three rules include: a journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then yield the floor; a follow-up question will be permitted at the discretion of the president or the White House and then the journalist must yield the floor; and "yielding the floor" includes if necessary physically surrendering the microphone, according to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.
Not quite.
White House restores Jim Acosta's press pass, but institutes new rules for journalists
But the White House also instituted new rules for journalists at press conferences, claiming it has the right to suspend or revoke a journalist's credentials if they fail to follow any of the rules. Those three rules include: a journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then yield the floor; a follow-up question will be permitted at the discretion of the president or the White House and then the journalist must yield the floor; and "yielding the floor" includes if necessary physically surrendering the microphone, according to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.
Would you be fine with a leftist government prohibiting conservative press at the White House?
The most reasonable argument I have heard in favor of Acosta is that the government may not engage in viewpoint discrimination when it issues press passes. And I am inclined to agree that it shouldn't.
However, it stretches way past the bounds of reason to claim that is what is happening here. Acosta is not having his pass revoked because of his viewpoint, but because of his behavior.
Should Trump have his speaking privileges revoked because of his behavior?
Vague
Ah, so you don't know what I was referring to.
Not quite.
White House restores Jim Acosta's press pass, but institutes new rules for journalists
But the White House also instituted new rules for journalists at press conferences, claiming it has the right to suspend or revoke a journalist's credentials if they fail to follow any of the rules. Those three rules include: a journalist called upon to ask a question will ask a single question and then yield the floor; a follow-up question will be permitted at the discretion of the president or the White House and then the journalist must yield the floor; and "yielding the floor" includes if necessary physically surrendering the microphone, according to White House press secretary Sarah Sanders.
Look, Don2 acted like he knew what he was talking about, so surely he did until he admitted he didn't.