untermensche
Contributor
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
Lol
Those with no ideas many times do have opinions.
Those with no ideas many times do have opinions.
I KNOW RIGHT!?
I just don't understand how you can be so wrong about everything. You'd think that you'd get the occasional thing right, if only by chance, but nope.
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
BS. You may not understand how your computer performs all of its functions, but it is still clear from what you do know that it is your computer that's performing its functions and not some autonomous agent running the show.
Every part of a computer is designed. What every part is doing is known.
But a computer without an active human consciousness is just a box that sits and does nothing.
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
What good is life without detailed and proven gene structures, decoders and recoders.
Now you're being steamrolled into the macadam.
What good is life without detailed and proven gene structures, decoders and recoders.
Now you're being steamrolled into the macadam.
What good is having a consciousness if it can initiate NOTHING?
Such a consciousness is superfluous and not necessary.
Not likely anything like that would ever arise.
What good is life without detailed and proven gene structures, decoders and recoders.
Now you're being steamrolled into the macadam.
What good is having a consciousness if it can initiate NOTHING?
Such a consciousness is superfluous and not necessary.
Not likely anything like that would ever arise.
We specifically know how a computer achieves all it's effects.
What good is a computer without very detailed programs?
Well, let's see. I recall a computer solving a differential equation with no programing at all. (Details on request.)
What good is having a consciousness if it can initiate NOTHING?
Such a consciousness is superfluous and not necessary.
Not likely anything like that would ever arise.
Consciousness is not a thing.
Well, let's see. I recall a computer solving a differential equation with no programing at all. (Details on request.)
Don't confuse him George S. He's way to young to be familiar with analog computers and he was probably never in military gunnery or Naval fire control.
Not an unsubstantiated claim sir. Here is a cute example generated through the use of an AFSC electronic translator of Russian activities circa 1963 with mathematical electronic computations including solving differential equation using analog computing methods.
Electronic Analog Computers with their Applications for Investigation of Automatic Control Systems https://talkfreethought.org/showthread.php?10432-Consciousness&p=457343#post457343
... and here are two references on the topic.
Analog Computers, Ship Gun fire control system
Me? I worked with both a Mark 56 GFCS and a Mark 86 MFCS computer whilst in the Navy.
You're posting here with no knowledge, little information, and almost no reasoning. RU a Bot untermenche?
Just for the fun of it, I build an analog computer to run my dissertation experiments off an analog random number generator which was a component in the digital computer in which the tapes I generated were sequentially presented through the analog computer. That computer consisted of steppers driving three orthogonal placed pistons using a hydraulic system located in the lab controlling the movement of a speaker in an darkened Anechoic room. Signals arerived at the observer isolated from other cues through suspension in a chair.
Observer responses were transmitted back to the digital computer and collected in a digital table for each session which then were later run through UCLA's Statistical analysis package.
So if a bird uses a stick as a tool it was because of human programming?