Note that there are two separate issues here!Won't be fooled again;
Dr. Anthony Fauci commissioned a February 2020 paper to disprove the possibility that COVID originated in a lab — before publicizing the study at a White House news conference weeks later. Newly-released emails uncovered by House Republicans probing the COVID-19 pandemic show the former head of the National Institutes of Allergy and Infectious Diseases both commissioned and had final approval on a scientific paper which claimed it was 'improbable' that the virus leaked out of a lab in Wuhan, China. Just a few weeks later, he stood next to then-President Donald Trump at a press conference and cited that very paper as evidence that the idea of a lab leak was implausible - without admitting he commissioned it. Many media outlets then started to dismiss the idea, only to later suggest the lab leak theory is possible as new evidence arose supporting the claim. And in January, the Energy Department and the FBI both concluded that the virus did likely spread from a lab leak in Wuhan. The CIA is yet to declare a definitive position. The bombshell emails released by House Republicans on Sunday shows that Fauci commissioned and edited a paper entitled The Proximal Origin of SARS-CoV-2 before he cited it as evidence that COVID did not originate from a lab in Wuhan. It was written just four days after Fauci, and his NIH boss Francis Collins, held a call with the authors to discuss reports that COVID may have been leaked from a genetic testing lab in Wuhan and 'may have been intentionally genetically manipulated.' And in the emails, Dr. Kristian Andersen admits that Fauci 'prompted' him to write the paper with the goal of 'disproving' the lab leak theory.
Daily Mail
It still doesn't prove that the virus came from a lab but it does say a lot about Fauci being the dishonest, flip flopping toady that he is.
1) Is the virus the result of genetic engineering? Despite QOP claims to the contrary there's no reason to think so. All the "proof" of genetic tampering doesn't hold up and it would be a rather stupid thing for them to have been doing. While we have seen a lot of stupidity from China over this almost all of it appears to be the usual problem of too-strict control: Underlings trying to accomplish things where they have been overtaken by events but their orders haven't been updated. Beijing doesn't make many stupid moves.
2) Could the virus be natural, passed by way of an animal at the virology lab? This inherently can never be proven nor disproven. While the wet market handled far more animals the lab probably handled ones from more remote locations.