Why do you guys hate science?
Why are you quoting an article that is citing an
economics paper and calling it "science"?
No offense laughing dog.
Also, seeing the death rates in Australia and New Zealand resulted in one-fifth the deaths we saw in the US, clearly restrictions are a possible method of reducing deaths. But America was never actually in a "lockdown". And what it was, was only for a short period before a few in the GOP hijacked a global health emergency and turned it into a political cash cow.
As soon as it became clear to the Trump maladministration that most of the early deaths were in big cities (particularly New York), where most voters lean Democrat, your nation was doomed.
My state has seen 2,734 deaths from Covid, of which 8 occurred before restrictions were lifted in January of 2022.
Not a typo. Eight deaths in all of 2020 and 2021, in a state with 5.2 million people, whose first recorded case was in January 2020.
Two years of mandatory mask wearing in public, eight deaths. One and a sixth years of optional (but recommended) mask wearing in public, 2,726 deaths.
Anyone who says that restrictions (including, but not limited to, mandatory use of masks) are ineffective has to explain this small (580 times) difference in death rate per annum from Covid in Queensland.
To add:
We have a similar population to that of South Carolina, but approximately 10% of that state's total fatalities to date, demonstrating the value of locking down hard, until a sizeable fraction of our population had been vaccinated.
The much derided plan to lock down, vaccinate, and then slowly return to normal with the expectation that that would lead to fatalities, but far fewer of them than would've occurred without strict measures, has been completely vindicated by the facts.
Half-arsed measures didn't work. To people who have only the USA to look at, it's easy to imagine that the fact that half-arsed measures were ineffective is an indication that nothing should have been done. But it's equally supportive of the counter proposal that far more should have been done.
And a glance at places that did far more, would tell anyone that that's the right conclusion.
Of course, when accepting these facts would entail admitting that you lobbied for the needless deaths of millions of people, it can be very difficult to say "sorry, we were wrong". But it's something that must be said, if you are to avoid the same disaster next time around.