• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Dear White America, which form of protest do you actually prefer?

Even though white people in America refer to white America all the time. :rolleyes:

Correct. White people can be wrong, Athena. So can black people. Amazing eh? And not all white people agree with other white people, and not all black people agree with other black people. We are actually individuals. Does that blow your mind?

When will we stop talking about races as if everybody with that trait is interchangeable and of the same views and opinions?
Why should we stop talking about race?

Stopping talking about races as if everybody with that trait is interchangeable and of the same opinion is not "stop talking about race". But of course you know that and just want to avoid my point.
 
Correct. White people can be wrong, Athena. So can black people. Amazing eh?
And you can be wrong. And when it comes to race relations in a country inwhich you do not reside, you usually are.
And not all white people agree with other white people, and not all black people agree with other black people. We are actually individuals. Does that blow your mind?
No. Neither do flat-earthers, young-earthers, and Obama-bithers.
When will we stop talking about races as if everybody with that trait is interchangeable and of the same views and opinions?
Why should we stop talking about race?

Stopping talking about races as if everybody with that trait is interchangeable
Who is doing that? Who has said that? Can you give examples of this interchangeability?
and of the same opinion is not "stop talking about race". But of course you know that and just want to avoid my point.
I want you to clarify your point.
 
The term you want is Conservative America. In spite of the volume level of the right wing outrage cacophony, most of us have a better appreciation for dissent than lip service.
 
You claimed his support of protests was "lucrative.'


Now you're saying it isn't.

It's lucrative for BLM.


So now you're changing the subject.


You said Soros was in in for the money, now you're claiming that Black Lives Matter is some sort of moneymaking scheme.


Can you back up any of this?
 
So now you're changing the subject.


You said Soros was in in for the money, now you're claiming that Black Lives Matter is some sort of moneymaking scheme.


Can you back up any of this?

No, my post commented that it was lucrative for protesters.

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2016/08/26/soross_campaign_of_global_chaos_131622.html


Can you link to a source which lays out the pay scale for protestors?


I mean, if I show up to one of these Soros events, do they write a check? Or is there cash involved?
 


Can you link to a source which lays out the pay scale for protestors?


I mean, if I show up to one of these Soros events, do they write a check? Or is there cash involved?

I dunno. But someone's making some dough. http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2016/aug/16/black-lives-matter-cashes-100-million-liberal-foun/
 
Why would you think I have that?


You waded into this thread with accusations that protests generally were a moneymaking scheme for Soros, then claimed he was funneling money to protestors, then made it seem like Black Lives Matter was this lucrative enterprise founded by Soros.


If you don't have any information backing up these ridiculous claims (other than links to right wing rags) then shut the fuck up.
 
Stopping talking about races as if everybody with that trait is interchangeable and of the same opinion is not "stop talking about race". But of course you know that and just want to avoid my point.
What point? Whether you like it or not, there is a "White America" and a "Black America". Whether you like it or not, race matters.
 
People could stop breaking the law...
When an incompetent person and an intelligent person are playing a game, there's only two ways for the incompetent to win:

1. He cheats
2. The intelligent person throws the game

For libs, the solution to the non-problem of "inequality" is to allow both: over-look the behavior of "POC" while forcing Whites under a microscope.
 
You are absolutely correct in this statement. Obviously their employer is okay with it though.
Is he? And would his potential next employer be as supportive?
And so is my white ass.
By that do you mean you support his right to protest or the content of the protest. Because Shaun was whining about people like him receiving opposition for voicing opinions. Take his example with Twitter. He is not alleging anybody is trying to silence black people on Twitter, no his complaint was that they receive opposition. But free speech is a two way street. If Shaun or Colin or anybody else want to express their opinion, they have to accept that people who do not share their opinions have the right to express theirs.
 
Back
Top Bottom