Democrats 2020

[J842P]

Keywords provided by Trump camp: “senile” and “creepy.” Instructions from Fox News dissemination: Keep using the words “senile” and “creepy.” It does not matter what the argument actually is. Always refer to Biden as “senile” and “creepy.” Report back for your ritual buttfucking at end of day.

They are very effective at doing this.

 

[angelo]

Quote Originally Posted by Harry Bosch View Post
Quote Originally Posted by angelo View Post
Cuomo is surely a huge step up as compared to creepy, senile Joe or a gawd forbid, the crazy Bern. If the Dems are serious about securing victory in November, they could do a lot worse than Cuomo, if it isn't too late to endorse him.
But Angelo, don't you think that Biden will be better than sleazy, stupid as shit Trump?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
No I don't! I think the current carload [ down from a busload] of Dem clowns, especially the pedo Biden, or the other wannabee, Loony Tunes Bern are competant enough to inhabit the WH. Both would undo all what the Donald has achieved in three short years. Which is more than Obongo, and his predecessor achieved in decades. Two examples is to make the US a net exporter of oil and gas, breaking the hold countries such Saudi Arabia had on America's energy needs, which could be used to blackmail the US as they have done in past.

The other is to turn around the exodus of American corporations to low taxing countries by lowering their tax burden and cutting red tape enabling them to stay put on American soil and be able to compete with likes of communist China and other South East Asian nations.

 

[angelo]

Keywords provided by Trump camp: “senile” and “creepy.” Instructions from Fox News dissemination: Keep using the words “senile” and “creepy.” It does not matter what the argument actually is. Always refer to Biden as “senile” and “creepy.” Report back for your ritual buttfucking at end of day.

They are very effective at doing this.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well here's four of them.

 

[Patooka]

Keywords provided by Trump camp: “senile” and “creepy.” Instructions from Fox News dissemination: Keep using the words “senile” and “creepy.” It does not matter what the argument actually is. Always refer to Biden as “senile” and “creepy.” Report back for your ritual buttfucking at end of day.

They are very effective at doing this.

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well here's four of them.

Being creepy to women doesn't disqualify you for being President anymore. Hasn't for at least a couple of years. It should, but it doesn't.

 

[angelo]

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well here's four of them.

Being creepy to women doesn't disqualify you for being President anymore. Hasn't for at least a couple of years. It should, but it doesn't.

Especially if the candidate is not Trump. Right! It's simply amazing how truly depraved the anyone but Trump aficionados have become. No wonder middle America can't get enough distance away from the lunatic fringe of the Democratic Party.

 

[Patooka]

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. Well here's four of them.

Being creepy to women doesn't disqualify you for being President anymore. Hasn't for at least a couple of years. It should, but it doesn't.

Especially if the candidate is not Trump. Right! It's simply amazing how truly depraved the anyone but Trump aficionados have become. No wonder middle America can't get enough distance away from the lunatic fringe of the Democratic Party.

What do you mean "if the candidate is not Trump"? Last time I checked, he's President of the US. His history did jack shit disqualifying him being President. And if the Democrats are fringe (yet seems to get more votes in elections than any other party in the US), you really must despise commie pinko Morrison and his fringe leftist views..

 

[southernhybrid]

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/some-top-sanders-advisers-urge-him-to-consider-withdrawing/2020/04/04/224d8164-767f-11ea-85cb-8670579b863d_story.html

A small group of Bernie Sanders’s top aides and allies — including his campaign manager and his longtime strategist — have encouraged the independent senator from Vermont to consider withdrawing from the presidential race, according to two people with knowledge of the situation.
The group includes campaign manager Faiz Shakir and Rep. Pramila Jayapal (D-Wash.), a top Sanders surrogate and ally, according to the people, who spoke on the condition of anonymity to describe sensitive private discussions.
Sanders himself has become more open to the prospect of dropping out, according to one of the people with knowledge of the situation and another close ally, especially if he suffers a significant defeat in Tuesday’s Wisconsin primary, which polls suggest Joe Biden will win handily.

One of the people with knowledge of the situation said they believe Sanders has warmed to the idea of bowing out in the near future, since he has been unable to make up any ground on Biden and is bracing for another potential landslide loss in Wisconsin, a state he won four years ago. One of the people predicted that if Sanders loses Wisconsin by more than 15 points, he probably would get out of the race and get behind Biden.
Beyond Wisconsin, this person said, there are concerns among at least some in the campaign about criticism in the press of Sanders as a spoiler who’s making it harder for Democrats to defeat President Trump. They also believe it will be difficult to change the dynamic in a race that has been frozen in place by the coronavirus crisis

 

[Copernicus]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

 

[angelo]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

All four of those images are from past news sources. Besides, he's admitted it himself that he is sometimes seen in the wrong light regarding his closeness to females. But hey, at least he's not sniffing male's hair!

 

[angelo]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

All four of those images are from past news sources. Besides, he's admitted it himself that he is sometimes seen in the wrong light regarding his closeness to females. But hey, at least he's not sniffing male's hair!

Americans elect this creep at their own peril!

 

[Patooka]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

All four of those images are from past news sources. Besides, he's admitted it himself that he is sometimes seen in the wrong light regarding his closeness to females. But hey, at least he's not sniffing male's hair!

Americans elect this creep at their own peril!

It takes either a huuuuuge amount of cognitive dissonance or a complete lack of self awareness to say that,

"Joe Biden is a creep, so I'm going to vote for the guy who wants to fuck his own daughter instead."

 

[Harry Bosch]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

All four of those images are from past news sources. Besides, he's admitted it himself that he is sometimes seen in the wrong light regarding his closeness to females. But hey, at least he's not sniffing male's hair!

Americans elect this creep at their own peril!

Biden is much more honorable than sleezy shit for brains Trump. I'm sure you agree!

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

To everyone who is posting a reply to angelo's pictures of Biden kissing women: How do you know that those photos are not photo-shopped? He gets his stuff from right wing propaganda sites, and those sites are going to contain a lot of faked information. Unless there is a link to the source, nothing like that should be trusted. Reposting his pictures and making a comment only makes it worse, because that is the whole reason why people photoshop that kind of material.

All four of those images are from past news sources. Besides, he's admitted it himself that he is sometimes seen in the wrong light regarding his closeness to females. But hey, at least he's not sniffing male's hair!

Americans elect this creep at their own peril!

[YOUTUBE]https://youtu.be/DP7yf8-Lk80[/YOUTUBE]

 

[PyramidHead]

All of the presidential aspirants voted for the war.

Excuse me what

 

[Horatio Parker]

All of the presidential aspirants voted for the war.

Excuse me what

In 2003.

 

[PyramidHead]

All of the presidential aspirants voted for the war.

Excuse me what

In 2003.

Control+F and type Sanders

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

 

[Horatio Parker]

In 2003.

Control+F and type Sanders

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

Sanders was not a presidential contender in 2003.

 

[lpetrich]

They Disappeared the Fighter: Thoughts on Elizabeth Warren’s Campaign - The American Prospect - "Warren was ill-served by consultants and had everything that made her a compelling political figure erased from her image."

She hired campaign consultant Joe Rospars.

Rospars was responsible for positioning Warren to the electorate. If you asked me to identify Elizabeth Warren’s talents as a politician, I would simply say that she’s a fighter. Witness her performance in hearings that would so damage the reputations of (mostly) male financial titans that they would quickly resign in disgrace. She fought the Obama administration whenever it strayed from putting the public interest over the interests of financiers. The fights displayed her first principles: a populist champion of the little guy, battling a rigged system.

Under Rospars, Warren decided to highlight how she had a very nice golden retriever. “They chose ... Bailey over ‘blood and teeth,’” said one anonymous staffer to Politico, referring to an old quote where Warren said she would rather have no Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “and plenty of blood and teeth left on the floor” than a weak agency. Several staffers complained that Rospars tried to soften Warren’s edges, make her less polarizing, and generally erase the thing that made her a political rock star in the first place. Campaigns that express a fear of letting the candidate act like the candidate rarely succeed.

In place of this, Rospars highlighted Warren’s plans, white papers that are relatively common in presidential campaigns. The focus on policy was admirable, and did have an initial impact. But it eventually started to blur together; by the end, new plans were being fashioned out of bits and pieces of old plans so the campaign could say they had a new plan.

So Elizabeth Warren got wimpified, and that deprived her of much of her appeal -- a candidate who will fight for ordinary people.

Even though it was too late, eviscerating Michael Bloomberg in the Las Vegas debate in February gave her a boost. The populist pugilist, the fighter for the middle class, put her into contention.

 

[Trausti]

They Disappeared the Fighter: Thoughts on Elizabeth Warren’s Campaign - The American Prospect - "Warren was ill-served by consultants and had everything that made her a compelling political figure erased from her image."

She hired campaign consultant Joe Rospars.

Rospars was responsible for positioning Warren to the electorate. If you asked me to identify Elizabeth Warren’s talents as a politician, I would simply say that she’s a fighter. Witness her performance in hearings that would so damage the reputations of (mostly) male financial titans that they would quickly resign in disgrace. She fought the Obama administration whenever it strayed from putting the public interest over the interests of financiers. The fights displayed her first principles: a populist champion of the little guy, battling a rigged system.

Under Rospars, Warren decided to highlight how she had a very nice golden retriever. “They chose ... Bailey over ‘blood and teeth,’” said one anonymous staffer to Politico, referring to an old quote where Warren said she would rather have no Consumer Financial Protection Bureau “and plenty of blood and teeth left on the floor” than a weak agency. Several staffers complained that Rospars tried to soften Warren’s edges, make her less polarizing, and generally erase the thing that made her a political rock star in the first place. Campaigns that express a fear of letting the candidate act like the candidate rarely succeed.

In place of this, Rospars highlighted Warren’s plans, white papers that are relatively common in presidential campaigns. The focus on policy was admirable, and did have an initial impact. But it eventually started to blur together; by the end, new plans were being fashioned out of bits and pieces of old plans so the campaign could say they had a new plan.

So Elizabeth Warren got wimpified, and that deprived her of much of her appeal -- a candidate who will fight for ordinary people.

Even though it was too late, eviscerating Michael Bloomberg in the Las Vegas debate in February gave her a boost. The populist pugilist, the fighter for the middle class, put her into contention.

Nonsense. She and Bernie were fighting for the same slice of the Dem party; but Bernie has had dibs since 2016.

 

[PyramidHead]

In 2003.

Control+F and type Sanders

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2002/roll455.xml

Sanders was not a presidential contender in 2003.

My mistake, I thought you meant the vote was in 2003 and the context was current contenders