• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

Does Trump has a chance in hell?

If the election would be today, who do you think would win?

  • Hillary Clinton

    Votes: 22 81.5%
  • Donald Trump

    Votes: 1 3.7%
  • Vermin Supreme

    Votes: 4 14.8%

  • Total voters
    27
  • Poll closed .
The uber-feminist Hillary needed Bill and Donald to come up with this plan for her. They're not the ones at the congressional hearing answering the questions about her emails, she is. Without the team of woman-abusing-men that support her, she really can't stand on her own.

The thing I find the oddest about this election is that for all of Bill Clinton's intelligence, guile, cunning and ability to play 4-D chess against the entire nation while solving a Rubix Cube blindfolded, he still can't manage to come up with a decent answer for his wife to give about her damn emails.
 
The little bits and pieces I hear about the polls indicate Clinton ahead. I'm not sure how much polls can be relied upon but in any event, I think Clinton would win today. And tomorrow and every day through November 8th. Trump just seems more unhinged and incoherent every time I hear him. But then again, the bias MSM may just be feeding me soundbites. Not that it makes a difference to me, my mind was made up long ago.
 
Trump? Fuck, no. This was over months ago. Everything you see now is just the media trying to keep their ratings up for the equivalent of a Monday Night Football blowout. Even the millennials are leaving the independent candidates and moving to Clinton.
 

If you mean "The polls might be a few percent off, like the Brexit polls were, and Hillary might therefore only win by a narrow margin", then I agree.

If you mean "The Brexit polling suggested a narrow victory for 'remain', and the result was a minuscule victory for 'leave', so as the polls indicate an easy win for Hillary, the result will be a victory for Trump", then :hysterical:

If you are suggesting that the polls can be relied upon to always pick incorrectly, then :hysterical: x 2
 
I think that Hillary will probably do slightly better than the polls indicate; she will win fairly easily. I would be a little surprised if Trump won Florida, and even if he did, it wouldn't be enough. I would be equally surprised if Clinton won Missouri, but she doesn't even need to come close there - and I suspect that she will at least come close.

I strongly suspect that the rather large group of 'undecideds' still visible in the polls will go mostly to Clinton - Trump really doesn't strike me as a candidate that one can vote for if one is feeling 'meh'. You love him or you hate him.
 

If you mean "The polls might be a few percent off, like the Brexit polls were, and Hillary might therefore only win by a narrow margin", then I agree.

If you mean "The Brexit polling suggested a narrow victory for 'remain', and the result was a minuscule victory for 'leave', so as the polls indicate an easy win for Hillary, the result will be a victory for Trump", then :hysterical:

If you are suggesting that the polls can be relied upon to always pick incorrectly, then :hysterical: x 2
North Carolina is in the margin of error, but just about every poll has been in Clinton's favor. Some Trump basers actually think Pennsylvania is the swing state! They have New Hampshire going for Trump despite being something like 8 pts behind... for a while.
 
If you mean "The polls might be a few percent off, like the Brexit polls were, and Hillary might therefore only win by a narrow margin", then I agree.

If you mean "The Brexit polling suggested a narrow victory for 'remain', and the result was a minuscule victory for 'leave', so as the polls indicate an easy win for Hillary, the result will be a victory for Trump", then :hysterical:

If you are suggesting that the polls can be relied upon to always pick incorrectly, then :hysterical: x 2
North Carolina is in the margin of error, but just about every poll has been in Clinton's favor. Some Trump basers actually think Pennsylvania is the swing state! They have New Hampshire going for Trump despite being something like 8 pts behind... for a while.

Pennsylvania is likely the tipping point - Whoever wins there almost certainly wins the presidency.

Which is why Trump is basically fucked at this point.
 
What, no Walken/Busey 2016...:cool::p:lol:

<A HREF="http://lolsnaps.com" <IMG SRC="http://lolsnaps.com/upload_pic/6a6ee0ca-walken-busey-2016.jpg" </A>

Later,
ElectEngr
 
Last edited:
Trump is probably not even going to win Utah. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/utah/#now

Evan McMullin is rapidly gaining on him, and has every chance of winning the state's half-dozen EVs. The last time the GOP failed to win in Utah was 1964; and they haven't won the presidency without winning Utah since 1896. And yet people are still thinking Trump might win the presidency? Dream on.
 
Trump is probably not even going to win Utah. https://projects.fivethirtyeight.com/2016-election-forecast/utah/#now

Evan McMullin is rapidly gaining on him, and has every chance of winning the state's half-dozen EVs. The last time the GOP failed to win in Utah was 1964; and they haven't won the presidency without winning Utah since 1896. And yet people are still thinking Trump might win the presidency? Dream on.
That with Arizona and Texas polling so tightly, this indicative of a couple things... in Arizona, what, about 5% Mormon? And Hispanics. The polling implies Hispanics will be voting against Trump in big numbers. Why does this matter? Colorado, where there is a decent Hispanic population (20%). If certain states are close, that means other states are already lost.

I do ponder Michigan and Ohio and wonder how much the Detroit bailout and Flint water crisis is leading to a solid win where Ohio, where there are lots of people that lost jobs to other nations (in the 80s and 90s) with the loss of rubber and steel, seem to want to edge towards Trump. The states have a similar population breakdown.
 
Clinton will win. The question is whether or not it will be a landslide of epic proportions, and if so, what that means for the country. If she wins by a giant landslide she may think she has a total mandate to do whatever she wants, and it being Hillary, that means your country will become MORE of an oligarchy ruled by banksters and corporations, not less. This is why the Green Party needs more support than usual this year (but Jill Stein is less than stellar herself). Decades from now Hillary may also be heralded as having fought a great campaign and having had being a woman been a major barrier as she broke through the glass ceiling etc, instead of the mere fact of who she was running against.

I still bemoan Elizabeth Warren failing to run. She would have been a first female president your country could truly be proud of and I would be envious of you instead of looking at you with pity.
 
Back
Top Bottom