Electron shells as focal planes for mass distribution of universe

[Kharakov]

A neutron decays into a proton and uses part of itself (the electron) to observe the rest of the mass distribution of the universe.


What is the structure of spacetime around a point in spacetime? The structure of spacetime around that point must reflect the overall distribution of mass in the universe.

How would a point entity, like a neutron, detect, measure, and map the mass distribution of the universe? It might generate a measuring device (like an electron shell) using a force decoupled from mass.

 

[DrZoidberg]

A neutron decays into a proton and uses part of itself (the electron) to observe the rest of the mass distribution of the universe.


What is the structure of spacetime around a point in spacetime? The structure of spacetime around that point must reflect the overall distribution of mass in the universe.

How would a point entity, like a neutron, detect, measure, and map the mass distribution of the universe? It might generate a measuring device (like an electron shell) using a force decoupled from mass.

What do you mean by "measure" and "observe"? I understand they're metaphors. But not of what. Obviously they're not able to "know" (metaphor) anything apart of their immidiate vicinity.

 

[Kharakov]

I'm assuming that neutrons are conscious entities.

 

[Shadowy Man]

I'm assuming that neutrons are conscious entities.

And how then are your defining "conscious" in this context?

 

[Kharakov]

Probably plotting against me.

 

[Elixir]

Is there an event horizon around every neutron? (After all, they are pure neutronium, right?)

 

[fromderinside]

Naw. Gotta squeeze them a lot to produce an event horizon.

 

[Kharakov]

Is there an event horizon around every neutron? (After all, they are pure neutronium, right?)

If they are lone neutrons, they generally decomboobulate so that they have an inverse event horizon (repulsive) at the electron shell area. If they band up with other neutrons and proton/electron shell pairs, they share repulsive event horizons.

It gets a bit complicated, and from a certain perspective the repulsive horizons appear attractive because they add repulsion together. Top a' the mornin' to ya.

 

[Malintent]

I'm assuming that neutrons are conscious entities.

I held that assumption about you, at first.

 

[J842P]

Probably plotting against me.

Lol.

 

[Kharakov]

I think Malintent is a neutron.

 

[bilby]

I think Malintent is a neutron.

That's a negligible charge.

 

[DBT]

But hard to pin down. Is it here? Is it there? Is it both here and there? What is its velocity? What is its state? Is it a wave? Is it a particle? Is it observed or unobserved? Is it matter? Is it wave? Is it probabilistic or is it deterministic?

 

[Malintent]

I think Malintent is a neutron.

are you Positive?

 

[Malintent]

But hard to pin down. Is it here? Is it there? Is it both here and there? What is its velocity? What is its state? Is it a wave? Is it a particle? Is it observed or unobserved? Is it matter? Is it wave? Is it probabilistic or is it deterministic?

It is neither here nor there
Velocity does not apply
State does not apply
a wave is a simplistic way of describing it
a particle is a lazy way of describing it
It is both observed and not observed
it is not matter (but it matters)
and probabilistic versus deterministic is just a matter of perspective.. so, both, I guess.

 

[Kharakov]

Definitely not.

 

[Malintent]

Definitely not.

well, at least don't be negative. I have my ion you. (that one was free... coming from the Neutron here, that's "no charge")

 

[DBT]

But hard to pin down. Is it here? Is it there? Is it both here and there? What is its velocity? What is its state? Is it a wave? Is it a particle? Is it observed or unobserved? Is it matter? Is it wave? Is it probabilistic or is it deterministic?

It is neither here nor there
Velocity does not apply
State does not apply
a wave is a simplistic way of describing it
a particle is a lazy way of describing it
It is both observed and not observed
it is not matter (but it matters)
and probabilistic versus deterministic is just a matter of perspective.. so, both, I guess.

That clears it up.

 

[Kharakov]

Definitely not.

well, at least don't be negative. I have my ion you. (that one was free... coming from the Neutron here, that's "no charge")

My previous attempts to create a fair and balanced solution always end up polarized one way or another, so I'll try and be less salty.

 

[Malintent]

well, at least don't be negative. I have my ion you. (that one was free... coming from the Neutron here, that's "no charge")

My previous attempts to create a fair and balanced solution always end up polarized one way or another, so I'll try and be less salty.

Hey, you can be part of the solution, or you can be part of the precipitate.