Derec
Contributor
No, that's not necessary at all. Read the article about the fakefugee and rapefugee Ali Bashar.I presume by "100% preventable", you mean prevantable if all middle-eastern migrants to Germany, legitimate refugees or not, had been turned down at the border? Among which there would be those who would be killed or raped or both back in the camps or their home countries.
Iraqi migrant accused of raping and killing teen girl to be returned to Germany
Telegraph said:His asylum claim was rejected in December 2016 but he appealed against the decision and was allowed to remain in Germany while the case was ongoing.
It has since emerged that Bashar had an extensive police file in Germany dating back to April 2016, and was facing charges over a violent robbery in March this year and a separate case of carrying an illegal knife.
He was also investigated by police as a possible suspect in an earlier rape of an 11-year-old girl at the migrant shelter where he was staying.
Why does Germany allow such people to run around freely? He should have been deported in 2016 at the latest. Even better, more care should have been taken to vet people seeking to come into Germany and elsewhere in Europe. Instead, red carpet was rolled out to a million random Muslim migrants
Yes, migration can be good or bad. Merkel's migration policy has been an unmitigated disaster however. Not only because of terrorists and criminals that inevitably come with such a flood of humanity (especially when the authorities do not even bother to vet anybody who comes in!) but also because a flood of millions of people from cultures incompatible with Western cultures is going to change the host countries for the worse. We already see the signs of more and more emboldened political Islam in Europe.Migration may be good or bad, but the overall immigration policies should not be based on what 0.01% of the criminals among them might do, but rather strive at fairness for the 99.99%. The rest can be handled as special cases.