Yes, and you can misunderstand them as well.
Don't you think the main difference is not their skin colors but in that
What prompted the rhetorical question was you committing the fallacy of asking a loaded question. The question about beating one's wife is the achetypical example of the fallacy. Are you seriously suggesting you never heard it used that way?
A lot of things, but alas, this is not one of them.
I did not ask any loaded question. What are you babbling about?
I have heard it used that way. But your use made no sense.
It is pretty funny your answer to "WTF is wrong with you" is wrong.
Yes you did. It presupposed a claim that was in dispute.
Perhaps you should read your question again.
It's even funnier that you, who are wrong about pretty much everything, is accusing others of being wrong.
You can dispute reality all you want, but the claim is true. You are for social justice, not the same version as "leftist" SJWs.
Maybe they needed to get the 'conversation' started and couldn't figure out how to do it like a non-fuckwit.Shocker: Apparently, it was not some racist whitey from the KKK who left the messages on the computer afterall. It was a 15 year old prankster "person of color".
When they have actually committed wrongdoing they do pay the price. Often more than they actually deserve. Like the cop who shot Laquan McDonald (knife wielding nutter) being charged with 1st degree murder or that cop who raped these black women effectively getting life in prison. The cops connected with the Freddie Grey case are all overcharged as well, not to mention state courts playing fast and loose with the 5th amendment.
No, the protests are usually about shootings where there was no wrongdoing (or likely no wrongdoing if facts are still outstanding) by police. Michael Brown, Mario Woods, Jamar Clark, Tony Robinson etc. In other cases there were riots well before any investigation was given a chance to be completed, for example Freddie Grey riots in Baltimore.
Nothing is "every time" and demanding perfection is childish. But usually cops do get charged when caught in wrongdoing. That does not mean they are actually guilty of wrongdoing every time #BLM idiots are out protesting of course. In fact, the anger of the #BLM crowd is inversely proportional to the likelihood the cops did anything wrong.
Racism Charges in Bus Incident, and Their Unraveling, Upset University at Albany
Three black female college students claims they were attacked on a bus, caused a racism brou-ha-ha on campus (reminiscent of the idiocy that went on in Missouri) but it turns out the three were not only lying about the whole thing, but were the ones who attacked somebody.
Hillary got in on the action too: Why Hasn’t Hillary Deleted This Hoax Tweet? Undeleted tweet here.
Note that the NYT article, despite the claims being discredited, is still very much supportive of the "social justice warrior" side. When will they learn that justice is an individual thing and should not depend on somebody's gender, race or other irrelevant group membership?
The hoaxers even got their own hashtag, #defendblackgirlsualbany. I.e. the "girls" are to be defended because they are black, no matter that they are about as truthful as Tawana Brawley or Crystal Magnum.
And it's hardly the only recent racial hoax. See this gem.
Video refutes claims that St. Louis police held children at gunpoint
Of course it being bogus did not stop protesters to come out and hurl baseless accusations.
#blackliesmatter
#falseaccusationsmatter?Racism Charges in Bus Incident, and Their Unraveling, Upset University at Albany
Three black female college students claims they were attacked on a bus, caused a racism brou-ha-ha on campus (reminiscent of the idiocy that went on in Missouri) but it turns out the three were not only lying about the whole thing, but were the ones who attacked somebody.
Hillary got in on the action too: Why Hasn’t Hillary Deleted This Hoax Tweet? Undeleted tweet here.
Note that the NYT article, despite the claims being discredited, is still very much supportive of the "social justice warrior" side. When will they learn that justice is an individual thing and should not depend on somebody's gender, race or other irrelevant group membership?
The hoaxers even got their own hashtag, #defendblackgirlsualbany. I.e. the "girls" are to be defended because they are black, no matter that they are about as truthful as Tawana Brawley or Crystal Magnum.
And it's hardly the only recent racial hoax. See this gem.
Video refutes claims that St. Louis police held children at gunpoint
Of course it being bogus did not stop protesters to come out and hurl baseless accusations.
#blackliesmatter
There are false claims of racism and of rape and there are genuine claims of racism and rape. What is the point here??
