Thomas II
Contributor
Plus the proportions are all wrong.
Horses run like this
![]()
Depends on the gaiting of the horse.
Paintings are not to be taken as literal, factual depictions but as artistic representation. Also, cameras can catch and isolate movement as a series of stills while the human eye and brain do not and cannot. It is wrong to fault the artist for painting what his eyes and brain saw, particularly when one considers the impossibility of convincing any horse to hold a pose mid-gallop.
The point is that the painting in question is supposed to be a fairly realistic representation, and the position of legs is just not possible in a galloping horse

Last edited:











