These are trivial variances from the norm.
Oh?
You don't realize how ridiculous this position is?
Obesity is a trivial difference from the norm? Left handedness, which can result in such major differences as inability to perform certain tasks without accommodation tools?
You're just makign shit up, now.
Homosexuality has all the same parts. They just put them into people you don't approve of. There's no outward physical difference, it is EXACTLY like left-handedness. Same equipment, not be used the way you do.
It's ridiculous for you try to convince us - or yourself - that it is any less trivial than being a spacial thinker as opposed to a linear one, or an extrovert instead of an introvert or a pessimist (those freaks!) versus an optimist.
See, here's the thing that you (laughably) keep ignoring. ALL of the sexual things that homosexuals do, some heterosexuals do ALSO. They have sex just for fun with no desire for procreation. They stick penises into anuses, they stick fingers into vaginas, they stick vaginas into mouths. The list goes on and on.
There is NOTHING about homosexuality that is particularly out of any "norm."
I suspect you actually know this. That's why you won't actually enumerate or discuss any actual differences.
You mentioned that you are not married. I don't know if you're also a virgin, or if you are childless. Or even if you are past puberty. But you HAVE to realize that if you are past puberty and not sexually active that is NOT THE NORM, evolutionarily. And if you don't yet have children that is ABSOLUTELY a violation of your own claim of what should be legally pursued; "reproduction".
At least the homosexuals are trying. Following their evolutionary imperative.
It's like jailing drunk drivers but not those who fall asleep at the wheel. At least the drunks are TRYING.
You're not even doing as much as an earthworm (who will mate, it should be noted, with any earthworm it finds).
They cannot be compared with sexuality since sexuality is a primal feature of human nature.
What? No it's not. Sexuality is NOT what separates us from other animals.
In some ways it is the defining feature, the big kahuna of features.
It's the defining feature of _LIFE_, not humans. It's what separates us and the fungi from rocks, for instance.
It is the reason we are here. To reproduce.
Aaaaaaah. The old "we have a "reason" to be here Schtick. Sounds religious.
Doood. No reasons. We just are.
Reproduction is one of the ways we are still here.
Another is breathing. That keeps us around, too.
So does eating.
And competing for food.
There are lots of species that had the mating thing down, but lost the evolutionary battle. Ask the dinosaurs about that one, eh?
Sexuality is the emotional force behind the primal reason for each of us being here at the end of a line of evolution stretching back hundreds of millions of years.
So when it goes wrong it is not comparable to being left handed. It is a big deal.
Nah, it isn't.
Humans have had barren members of the population since we crawled out of the sea. It's just about the odds, dude. You just need to have ENOUGH of the population reproduce to maintain.
Wouldn't the joke totally be on YOU if the evolutionary benefit of homosexuality was in regulating the population in times of famine, overcrowding or stress such that reductions in growth rate take place without war? And that the existence of homosexual members of the population is the REASON we out-survived the dinosaurs?
And you can't dispute that possibility. So you should not be dissing the gays.
Homosexuality appears to be human sexuality gone wrong for reasons we do not yet understand.
Nobody wants to victimise people who suffer from homosexuality but neither are we obliged to stage a pantomime where we all put on smiley faces and pretend that everything is fine and homosexuality is just exactly the same as heterosexuality and there is nothing to see here folks, just move along.
Meh, it only appears that way to those of limited imagination.
And yes, you do want to victimize homosexuals by making DAMN SURE they know you think they aren't full members of society. That without whatever gene expression that makes vaginas desirable for their penises, they aren't full members of society.
It is the fantasy world of political correctness. It is embarrassing to see such large numbers of the population taken in by this political gong show.
Remember what lamenting "political correctness" means, mojo. It means, "goddamnit, why can't we just call them niggers anymore?" Politically Correct means the position that is held by the majority of the political voters. The position necessary for winning popular elections. To rail against political correctness is to rail against the overwhelming majority opinion.
That's what it means.
You're the freak here.
Homosexuality should be tolerated since it is not the homosexual's fault. A mature and inclusive society should even go out of its way to make room for these folk until we know more about the condition but please stop trying to tell us that it is 100% A-OK and that even thinking that homosexuals are 'different' (yes, in a way that matters) is an 'evil' thought-crime.
Straw man, mojo. You can think they're different all you want. I do. What I DON'T think is that they should be denied any rights or equal protection under the law. And yes, it's evil that anyone would. "They" are your fellow humans. They might even be yourself.
