Please read more carefully.Could you please cite Hamas source that says it is 20+x to 1? That number seems remarkably impossible. Areas would need to be void of civilians to manage that. I mean, it is possible we were talking 100 dead Hamas over a period of 1 year, but 10k to 15k in several months... and but a pittance is civilian casualties?By Hamas' own data the kill rate of terrorists is 20x the kill rate of civilians. That's an undisputed low value for the ratio. Reality is probably something like 40x but I don't think anyone knows for sure.Is it possible for you to either provide evidence for your claim or even to address the actual content of a post instead of imputing motives on the part of the poster?And you continue to stick your head in the sand and see that those civilian deaths are Hamas putting them in harm's way.Some? For a side that allegedly does not want dead civilians, the IDF manages to kill and injure magnitudes more than Hamas.Loren Pechtel said:The only side that wants dead civilians is Hamas. But they're quite effective at ensuring some die if Israel defends itself.
I'm saying that by Hamas numbers Israel has killed 20% of the terrorists (6,000 of 30,000) but 1% of the population (30,000 of a bit over 3M) as a whole. That's being very selective and clearly refutes the "indiscriminate" claim.