The issue is what the video said, not what Z said.
-
Features
Merged Gaza just launched an unprovoked attack on Israel
- Thread starter Derec
- Start date
To denote when two or more threads have been merged
The issue is what the video said, not what Z said.
Why should we trust the aid workers?
Their own video damns them, it's staged. You'll need to be logged in to read the explanation.
Their own video damns them, it's staged. You'll need to be logged in to read the explanation.
And some more about the "starvation".
A while back I posted the UN link that showed huge diversion and only counts what the UN handles. Turns out there's also an Israeli count: https://gaza-aid-data.gov.il/main/
2.4 pounds/day/person average over the whole time.
A while back I posted the UN link that showed huge diversion and only counts what the UN handles. Turns out there's also an Israeli count: https://gaza-aid-data.gov.il/main/
2.4 pounds/day/person average over the whole time.
laughing dog
Contributor
The video said that saying Palestinian lives matter by the the same people who got angry to the respondents of BLM who said "All Lives Matter" must anger Jewish people. Dr Z said that is how antisemitism works.
At best, the video is an exercise in pointing out hypocrisy on the left under the dubious assumption that the BLM protest situation and Gaza are comparable, Even under that stretch, hypocrisy may be an indication of antisemitism in this case, but it is certainly not a smoking gun. At best, the validity of Dr Z's argument rests on dubious assumptions.
laughing dog
Contributor
Perhaps you could give the explanation for those who cannot log in.
But, if the issue is that someone on a side lies thereby making the entire side untrustworthy, since you admit the IDF lies, why should we trust the IDF reports?
Israel got permission from the families to release some of that horrific video they previously had only shown to reporters. This is a mix of combat video taken by Hamas, security cameras and interrogation videos. Remember, the combat video is what Hamas crows about, it does not represent people out of control.
What's dubious about it? How are they different? You still aren't addressing the point.
laughing dog
Contributor
It is unsurprising you don’t see the difference. The video places the Israelis in the analogous position as the victims of state sanctioned violence not the Gazans.
I did. To quote someone, saying I am not does make it so.
1) Continuity error. There weren't tracks on the ground, then there were--but if the video is true there wasn't any vehicle there to leave the tracks.
2) The door positions are wrong. The driver's door isn't open enough for anyone to have been removed--but there's nobody there. The passenger door is slid open (this is a van, not a bus) despite the rescuers not having adequate gloves to have opened the hot door.
3) No signs of bodies even though the fire was still burning. People reached into fire to pull them out while wearing nitrile?!
4) Supposedly in combat but there are no sounds of combat.
And he missed:
5) This is supposedly the result of a tank cannon. What did it fire?
5a) Sabot? I can't imagine why they would be carrying sabot rounds. A sabot round is hardly going to notice going through the van. You would have matching small holes, spalling damage inside.
5b) HEAT? The likely round (or a more modern version, but the effect would be similar), even though not exactly ideal for the job. I'm not finding the explosive weight of any such shell, but the US version flings a 25 pound package, typically gun fired devices are about 20% boom so figure 5 pounds of boom. It's a shaped charge so the majority of the energy went forward but you still have a decent amount of boom, yet no deformation of the vehicle. The frame would likely stand up to that but the panels would not. I'm not finding an equation that I'm confident in using but I found some calculated values. The vehicle panels were exposed to at least 150psi. To give it some scale--this is way, way beyond elephants stepping on it.
5c) Canister? It would look like a sieve.
Once again we have damage that utterly does not make sense for the weapon supposedly employed.
And where have I said the IDF lies? I have said they make mistakes, but that's not the same as lying. I pointed out that the reporters were going with a quote that did not mean what was implied. (Saying they can't prove it's Hamas diverting the aid doesn't prove it's not.)
The context was 10/7. Who was attacked?
No, you didn't. You pretended it wasn't applicable.
The comparison is simple: 10/7 = George Floyd. You're turning it around and responding police lives matter.