Why should we trust the aid workers?
Their own video damns them, it's staged. You'll need to be logged in to read the explanation.
Perhaps you could give the explanation for those who cannot log in.
But, if the issue is that someone on a side lies thereby making the entire side untrustworthy, since you admit the IDF lies, why should we trust the IDF reports?
1) Continuity error. There weren't tracks on the ground, then there were--but if the video is true there wasn't any vehicle there to leave the tracks.
2) The door positions are wrong. The driver's door isn't open enough for anyone to have been removed--but there's nobody there. The passenger door is slid open (this is a van, not a bus) despite the rescuers not having adequate gloves to have opened the hot door.
3) No signs of bodies even though the fire was still burning. People reached into fire to pull them out while wearing nitrile?!
4) Supposedly in combat but there are no sounds of combat.
And he missed:
5) This is supposedly the result of a tank cannon. What did it fire?
5a) Sabot? I can't imagine why they would be carrying sabot rounds. A sabot round is hardly going to notice going through the van. You would have matching small holes, spalling damage inside.
5b) HEAT? The likely round (or a more modern version, but the effect would be similar), even though not exactly ideal for the job. I'm not finding the explosive weight of any such shell, but the US version flings a 25 pound package, typically gun fired devices are about 20% boom so figure 5 pounds of boom. It's a shaped charge so the majority of the energy went forward but you still have a decent amount of boom, yet no deformation of the vehicle. The frame would likely stand up to that but the panels would not. I'm not finding an equation that I'm confident in using but I found some calculated values. The vehicle panels were exposed to at least 150psi. To give it some scale--this is way, way beyond elephants stepping on it.
5c) Canister? It would look like a sieve.
Once again we have damage that utterly does not make sense for the weapon supposedly employed.