Merged Gaza just launched an unprovoked attack on Israel

[laughing dog]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

 

[DrZoidberg]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

 

[laughing dog]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

No. Putin’s stated rationale is that Ukraine is part of Russia because it was in the past. You know, how the West Bank is part of Israel because it was in the past.

 

[Derec]

To get back from the Judea and Samaria derail, there are apparently a few dozen Hamasniks holed up in the tunnels in Rafah, on the Israeli-controlled side of the Yellow Line.

Their supplies of food and water must be running low and there have been skirmishes between IDF and them for weeks. Hamas wants them to be given free passage to Hamas-occupied Gaza.

Anyway, four of them just got sent to their virgins yesterday.

Hamas commander killed trying to flee Rafah tunnel; slain IDF soldier’s rifle recovered

The commander of Hamas’s East Rafah Battalion, his deputy, and two other terror operatives were confirmed by the military to have been killed early Sunday morning after attempting to flee a tunnel in the southern Gaza Strip.

The operatives were spotted emerging from the tunnels in eastern Rafah, an IDF-held area where dozens of Hamas fighters were believed to be trapped underground.
[...]
The matter of the trapped Hamas fighters has gone without resolution for nearly two months since the ceasefire went into effect in early October, as mediating countries have tried to negotiate terms for their safe passage back to Hamas-controlled areas.
According to a Channel 12 report last week, Israel conveyed a proposal to Hamas the week before that would allow the operatives to leave the tunnel, as long as they surrender and agree to be transferred to Israeli prisons.

Since Hamas has 30 battalions in the Gaza Strip, battalion commander and deputy are both rather senior officers in the group.

 

[DrZoidberg]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

No. Putin’s stated rationale is that Ukraine is part of Russia because it was in the past. You know, how the West Bank is part of Israel because it was in the past.

That's not why Israel grabbed the west bank. The west bank is a dry height of little agricultural value. But it is a height. If you look at the rest of Israel its shaped like a banana around the West Bank. All Jordan needed to do was to park artillery there and bomb Israel into submission. Its also on the other side of the river Jordan. Meaning, if Israel takes it it will become harder for Jordan to reinforce their troops.

Leading up to the 1967 was Syria, Egypt and Jordan were massing troops on the Israeli border, obviously, preparing for war. They were also saying as much in their internal propaganda.

Israel decided to strike first. They took out Egypts airforce, swung around took out Jordans artillery and Syrias tanks and took the west bank before any of them had a chance to react. So Israel won. It was one of the most genius military moves in world history.

Basically, by taking the West Bank Israel switched from an indefensible position to a defensible position.

From an economic perspective the west bank is pretty worthless. But from a strategic perspective the west bank is extremely valuable.

As long as Jordan is an unfriendly (ie Muslim) country Israel needs to keep it. Its completely critical for its survival. So they will. That's the whole story here.

Islam is at the moment an imperialistic ever expanding army that cannot and will not accept that a country near its heartland isn't Islamic. There's no intelligence or politics involved. It's just brute force and sheer power of Muslim will. And there's nothing they're not willing to sacrifice to make it true.

If the Middle-East wasn't dependent on western countries buying their oil they would have taken Israel a long time ago.

But religions change and adapt. Eventually Islam will update and join the modern world. It just sucks right now for Israel

 

[Jimmy Higgins]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

Had Israel seized the land after being attacked, you'd have a viable point. But nickel and diming it today, that isn't the same thing. This is why Israel doesn't want a two state solution. They'd have to abide by the borders.

 

[laughing dog]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

No. Putin’s stated rationale is that Ukraine is part of Russia because it was in the past. You know, how the West Bank is part of Israel because it was in the past.

That's not why Israel grabbed the west bank. The west bank is a dry height of little agricultural value. But it is a height. If you look at the rest of Israel its shaped like a banana around the West Bank. All Jordan needed to do was to park artillery there and bomb Israel into submission. Its also on the other side of the river Jordan. Meaning, if Israel takes it it will become harder for Jordan to reinforce their troops.

Leading up to the 1967 was Syria, Egypt and Jordan were massing troops on the Israeli border, obviously, preparing for war. They were also saying as much in their internal propaganda.

Israel decided to strike first. They took out Egypts airforce, swung around took out Jordans artillery and Syrias tanks and took the west bank before any of them had a chance to react. So Israel won. It was one of the most genius military moves in world history.

Basically, by taking the West Bank Israel switched from an indefensible position to a defensible position.

From an economic perspective the west bank is pretty worthless. But from a strategic perspective the west bank is extremely valuable.

As long as Jordan is an unfriendly (ie Muslim) country Israel needs to keep it. Its completely critical for its survival. So they will. That's the whole story here.

Islam is at the moment an imperialistic ever expanding army that cannot and will not accept that a country near its heartland isn't Islamic. There's no intelligence or politics involved. It's just brute force and sheer power of Muslim will. And there's nothing they're not willing to sacrifice to make it true.

If the Middle-East wasn't dependent on western countries buying their oil they would have taken Israel a long time ago.

But religions change and adapt. Eventually Islam will update and join the modern world. It just sucks right now for Israel

As Jimmy Higgins pointed out, the slow step annexation of West Bank territory is inconsistent with your above explanation but it is consistent with claim that the West Bank should be part of Israel.

 

[DrZoidberg]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

No. Putin’s stated rationale is that Ukraine is part of Russia because it was in the past. You know, how the West Bank is part of Israel because it was in the past.

That's not why Israel grabbed the west bank. The west bank is a dry height of little agricultural value. But it is a height. If you look at the rest of Israel its shaped like a banana around the West Bank. All Jordan needed to do was to park artillery there and bomb Israel into submission. Its also on the other side of the river Jordan. Meaning, if Israel takes it it will become harder for Jordan to reinforce their troops.

Leading up to the 1967 was Syria, Egypt and Jordan were massing troops on the Israeli border, obviously, preparing for war. They were also saying as much in their internal propaganda.

Israel decided to strike first. They took out Egypts airforce, swung around took out Jordans artillery and Syrias tanks and took the west bank before any of them had a chance to react. So Israel won. It was one of the most genius military moves in world history.

Basically, by taking the West Bank Israel switched from an indefensible position to a defensible position.

From an economic perspective the west bank is pretty worthless. But from a strategic perspective the west bank is extremely valuable.

As long as Jordan is an unfriendly (ie Muslim) country Israel needs to keep it. Its completely critical for its survival. So they will. That's the whole story here.

Islam is at the moment an imperialistic ever expanding army that cannot and will not accept that a country near its heartland isn't Islamic. There's no intelligence or politics involved. It's just brute force and sheer power of Muslim will. And there's nothing they're not willing to sacrifice to make it true.

If the Middle-East wasn't dependent on western countries buying their oil they would have taken Israel a long time ago.

But religions change and adapt. Eventually Islam will update and join the modern world. It just sucks right now for Israel

As Jimmy Higgins pointed out, the slow step annexation of West Bank territory is inconsistent with your above explanation but it is consistent with claim that the West Bank should be part of Israel.

Israelis are pragmatic. That's been their guiding principle right from the start. Jews in their situation don't have the luxury of following any high ideals. They need to be realistic and accept what they need to accept, and fight back when they need to. They have a situation where all their neighbours have publicly promised to exterminate them if given the opportunity.

They also have every right to the West bank. There's that

 

[DrZoidberg]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

Had Israel seized the land after being attacked, you'd have a viable point. But nickel and diming it today, that isn't the same thing. This is why Israel doesn't want a two state solution. They'd have to abide by the borders.

Jordan had said they were going to attack and massing troops on the border. Basically, Jordan, Syria and Egypt were waiting for the others to attack first.

Striking before Jordan had a chance to was just militarily smart

Israel won't be able to accept a two state solution as long as the Palestinians are hellbent on murdering all Jews. That's just the sad reality of the situation.

Offering Palestinians self rule would hurt the Palestinians as much as themselves.

 

[laughing dog]

Israelis are pragmatic. That's been their guiding principle right from the start. Jews in their situation don't have the luxury of following any high ideals. They need to be realistic and accept what they need to accept, and fight back when they need to. They have a situation where all their neighbours have publicly promised to exterminate them if given the opportunity.

They also have every right to the West bank. There's that

Ignoring your baseless claims about Israel’s neighbors, no one has every right to land where others live. You’re talking like Putin does about Ukraine.

Ethnic cleansing is pragmatic even if it is morally reprehensible. Yet you continue to offer up apologia.

 

[Arctish]

Back to business as usual.
Israel announces plan to seize historical site in the West Bank as a new settlement appears

Israel’s Civil Administration announced its intention to expropriate large swaths of Sebastia, a major archaeological site in the West Bank, in the document obtained by The Associated Press on Thursday. Peace Now, an anti-settlement watchdog group, said the site is around 1,800 dunams (450 acres) — Israel’s largest seizure of archeologically important land.

The move came as Israeli settlers celebrated the creation of a new, unauthorized settlement near Bethlehem, and a Palestinian lawyer said a West Bank activist has been detained and hospitalized.

Bit by bit. The way they do.

The west bank was invaded by Jordan in 1848. It should have been a part of Israel right from the start….

But it wasn’t. Which eliminates the underpinning reason for yourIsraeli ethnic cleansing apologia.

I think he meant 1948.

Doesn’t matter what should have been. Dr Z’s reasoning mimics Putin’s rationale for invading Ukraine.

How do you mean? Are you seriously suggesting Ukraine somehow invaded and violently grabbed Donetsk, Luhansk and Crimea in the past?

Had Israel seized the land after being attacked, you'd have a viable point. But nickel and diming it today, that isn't the same thing. This is why Israel doesn't want a two state solution. They'd have to abide by the borders.

Jordan had said they were going to attack and massing troops on the border.

Jordan said they were going to attack what? The terrorist regime that had murdered thousands of civilians and driven hundreds of thousands into refugee camps? The one that claimed "both sides" of the Jordan River belonged to it? The one that had the Kingdom of Jordan in its sights as its next target?

We call that self defense. We call it anti-terrorism. We call it standing up for the Rights of people to remain in their homes and participate in the government that controls their movements, actions, endeavors, and prospects.

Basically, Jordan, Syria and Egypt were waiting for the others to attack first.

Striking before Jordan had a chance to was just militarily smart

Okay, so you think attacking States and starting wars is smart. I suppose you think the only thing wrong with Hamas' plan was the follow through.

Israel won't be able to accept a two state solution as long as the Palestinians are hellbent on murdering all Jews. That's just the sad reality of the situation.

"The Palestinians" have never been hellbent on murdering all Jews. That anti-Psemitic smear is pure propaganda.

The Zionist expansionist faction in Israel won't accept the Two State solution because its members want to continue expanding Israel's territorial claims. It has nothing to do with what the Palestinians want.

The Palestinians already made concessions to the Israelis. If Israelis want peace, they will have to make concessions to the Palestinians. That's how peace works.

Offering Palestinians self rule would hurt the Palestinians as much as themselves.

And ^this^ anti-Psemitic smear shows your true colors, DrZoinberg. It's patronizing faux-benevolence of the same kind as the racist bigoted drivel we used to hear from the KKK about what would happen if blacks were allowed to vote.

 

[ZiprHead]

They also have every right to the West bank. There's that

What makes you think so?

 

[DrZoidberg]

They also have every right to the West bank. There's that

What makes you think so?

It was part of Israel when it was founded in 1948. Jordan just took it. They took advantage of that there was absolute chaos around the world at the time.

And Judah amd Samaria were part of the Palestinian province during the Ottoman empire. Continued in the British Mandate. The Jordan river has always been the border.

 

[Tigers!]

"The Palestinians" have never been hellbent on murdering all Jews. That anti-Psemitic smear is pure propaganda.

And "From the river to the sea" means what exactly?

The Zionist expansionist faction in Israel won't accept the Two State solution because its members want to continue expanding Israel's territorial claims. It has nothing to do with what the Palestinians want.

The Palestinians already made concessions to the Israelis. If Israelis want peace, they will have to make concessions to the Palestinians. That's how peace works.

I would have thought that pulling out of Gaza was a concession from Israel.

 

[Arctish]

"The Palestinians" have never been hellbent on murdering all Jews. That anti-Psemitic smear is pure propaganda.

And "From the river to the sea" means what exactly?

It means whatever the speaker intends, which may or may not be what the listener believes.

Are you going to try to support DrZoidberg's claim that "the Palestinians are hellbent on murdering all Jews"? If so, you're going to have to make an actual case, not just post random questions.

The Zionist expansionist faction in Israel won't accept the Two State solution because its members want to continue expanding Israel's territorial claims. It has nothing to do with what the Palestinians want.

The Palestinians already made concessions to the Israelis. If Israelis want peace, they will have to make concessions to the Palestinians. That's how peace works.

I would have thought that pulling out of Gaza was a concession from Israel.

Gaza was under military occupation. The settlements were illegal and the people living in them were illegal immigrants.

It's not a concession to stop violating international law. It's not a concession to stop giving your opponents just cause to fight your incursion into their communities.

If I steal your house and let my cousins live in it, it's not a concession if I decide it's too much trouble to keep fending you off and make them move out again.

 

[DrZoidberg]

There's also the political situation. When Jordan took the West Bank they ethnically cleansed it from Jews. Since Israel is the only country in the Middle-East with a history of not ethnically cleansing anything, or arguing for ethnic cleansing, I think it's a good idea to keep them in charge of the west bank. And they did respect Arab rights after taking it. When Israel took back the West Bank they left the Arabs alone. Not only did they leave them alone, but they included them into legal protections, they'd never before enjoyed.

So there's every reason to support Israel continuing to rule the west bank.

The Arab arguments against Israeli rule habitually ignore how horrific Arab rulers have been, over their own people. The Nakhba is mostly nonsense. Israel is always held to standards that Arabs do not hold Arab rulers to. It's just the silliest tribal arguments. Hatred against Jews just to hate Jews.

"The Palestinians" have never been hellbent on murdering all Jews. That anti-Psemitic smear is pure propaganda.

And "From the river to the sea" means what exactly?

The Zionist expansionist faction in Israel won't accept the Two State solution because its members want to continue expanding Israel's territorial claims. It has nothing to do with what the Palestinians want.

The Palestinians already made concessions to the Israelis. If Israelis want peace, they will have to make concessions to the Palestinians. That's how peace works.

I would have thought that pulling out of Gaza was a concession from Israel.

There's no point making concessions to an opponent who doesn't care. There's no negotiation or agreement the Palestinians will agree to that isn't ethnic cleansing of all Jews from "the holy land".

Israel has already proven to be extremely good and fair stewards of the holy land. The Palestinian complaints is just pathetic whines about nothing.

And Palestinians know this. They think differently than Europeans. For them its just tribal. Whatever Jews does is bad, unless they submit to Muslim rule. There's no arguments or concepts of living peacefully together. Palestinians aren't stupid. Its just a question of different values.


First I think the Palestinians need to show some willingness to live in peace with Jews. Until then it would be suicidal for Israel to pull out.

Palestinians can have self rule. But I doubt they'll be allowed to have their own army in the future. Which is better for everyone

 

[Arctish]

There's also the political situation. When Jordan took the West Bank they ethnically cleansed it from Jews. Since Israel is the only country in the Middle-East with a history of not ethnically cleansing anything, or arguing for ethnic cleansing, I think it's a good idea to keep them in charge of the west bank. And they did respect Arab rights after taking it. When Israel took back the West Bank they left the Arabs alone. Not only did they leave them alone, but they included them into legal protections, they'd never before enjoyed.

So there's every reason to support Israel continuing to rule the west bank.

The Arab arguments against Israeli rule habitually ignore how horrific Arab rulers have been, over their own people. The Nakhba is mostly nonsense. Israel is always held to standards that Arabs do not hold Arab rulers to. It's just the silliest tribal arguments. Hatred against Jews just to hate Jews.

I would have thought that pulling out of Gaza was a concession from Israel.

There's no point making concessions to an opponent who doesn't care. There's no negotiation or agreement the Palestinians will agree to that isn't ethnic cleansing of all Jews from "the holy land".

Israel has already proven to be extremely good and fair stewards of the holy land. The Palestinian complaints is just pathetic whines about nothing.

And Palestinians know this. They think differently than Europeans. For them its just tribal. Whatever Jews does is bad, unless they submit to Muslim rule. There's no arguments or concepts of living peacefully together. Palestinians aren't stupid. Its just a question of different values.


First I think the Palestinians need to show some willingness to live in peace with Jews. Until then it would be suicidal for Israel to pull out.

Palestinians can have self rule. But I doubt they'll be allowed to have their own army in the future. Which is better for everyone

I have no idea where you're getting your information on the history of the region or the development of the conflict, but if you are accurately repeating what your source is telling you, it's crap.

The claims you make about the character of Palestinians is racist propaganda. You appear to be completely unaware of the peaceful relations between Palestinian Jews, Christians, and Muslims before the British took control of the area. You appear to be unaware of the Palestinian proposal for integrating European Jews in a multi-ethnic, multi-religion single State that was submitted to UN negotiators before the Zionists killed one of them and launched Plan Dalet. You appear to be utterly ignorant regarding the Oslo Accords.

Check your premises, DrZoidberg. You are basing your arguments on racist tropes, not on established facts or genuine historical accounts.

 

[Derec]

We were told there was a famine in Gaza. But this guy looks like he hasn't missed any meals in recent years.

(photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

 

[TSwizzle]

We were told there was a famine in Gaza. But this guy looks like he hasn't missed any meals in recent years.

(photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

Hmm, are you sure this isn't Londonistan?

 

[Shadowy Man]

We were told there was a famine in Gaza. But this guy looks like he hasn't missed any meals in recent years.

(photo courtesy of Al Jazeera)

One pudgy Palestinian nullifies any famine? Is this the same logic as how the pleasant temperatures of Santa Monica nullifies climate change?