God is My Superpower

[No Robots]

Is this Waton you keep quoting Rabbi Harry Waton (1870-1959), who wrote:

"Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have the right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters of the whole earth...not by material power, not by brute force, but by light, knowledge, understanding, humanity, peace, justice and progress. Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man and the emancipation of the working class and human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race. The races and the nations will cheerfully submit to the spiritual power of Judaism, and all will become Jews."

Do you think this vision is a reasonable analysis of history? Do you anticipate the same 'cheerful submission' he described?

Abso-fucking-lutely. The alternative is mouth-breathing, knuckle-dragging, anti-intellectual fascism. It seems you have made your choice.

Well, my knuckles do get low sometimes. Nice to've met ya, and good luck with all that.

For corroboration of Waton's views, see John Macmurray's The Clue to history:

For fascism is a purely negative will, and its power to act negatively and destructively is borrowed from the very positive forces which it negates. It cannot triumph. It can only destroy itself and create its opposite. It depends upon the Jewish consciousness which it opposes, and it develops in the world, through its own negativity, the negative form of the Jewish consciousness, in its rejection of its own Christian substance. But by securing the triumph of this Jewish consciousness it universalizes it; and in its development it must negate the negation and achieve in the world as a whole the triumph of the positive reality of the Jewish consciousness, which is Christianity. It is the inevitable destiny of fascism to create what it intends to prevent—the socialist commonwealth of the world. The fundamental law of human nature cannot be broken. “He that saveth his life shall lose it.” The will to power is self-frustrating. It is the meek who will inherit the earth.

The fascists know their days are numbered. The more they struggle against their inevitable demise, the stupider and weaker they get.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

^Reason and faith are both necessary. Faith is necessary to pursue a goal against obstacles, and reason is necessary to overcome obstacles and realize the goal. Ultimately, both faith and reason are united and overcome in the superman's fully developed intellect.

Cringe

Says the proud hedonist.

I'd think the idea that a person is a "superman" is way cringier, not to mention way more egotistical, than simply being proud about enjoying life and not having any stupid, overly lofty aspirations about being a "superman".

 

[GenesisNemesis]

But whatever, people like you are on the way out.

 

[DBT]

^Reason and faith are both necessary. Faith is necessary to pursue a goal against obstacles, and reason is necessary to overcome obstacles and realize the goal. Ultimately, both faith and reason are united and overcome in the superman's fully developed intellect.

Faith is the opposite of reason. Reason requires justification through evidence, while faith needs nothing more than to believe, to have faith.

 

[pood]

Is this Waton you keep quoting Rabbi Harry Waton (1870-1959), who wrote:

"Since the Jews are the highest and most cultured people on earth, the Jews have the right to subordinate to themselves the rest of mankind and to be the masters of the whole earth...not by material power, not by brute force, but by light, knowledge, understanding, humanity, peace, justice and progress. Judaism is communism, internationalism, the universal brotherhood of man and the emancipation of the working class and human society. It is with these spiritual weapons that the Jews will conquer the world and the human race. The races and the nations will cheerfully submit to the spiritual power of Judaism, and all will become Jews."

Do you think this vision is a reasonable analysis of history? Do you anticipate the same 'cheerful submission' he described?

I already pulled that quote from him way, way back. All he ever does is quote this guy. It’s la-la land stuff.

 

[ideologyhunter]

The only fringe in my house is an Albert Ayler CD and the edge of a throw blanket...

 

[No Robots]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement. They are quick to thwart thinkers by any means necessary: burning them, burning their works, ignoring them, ridiculing them. Our present-day fascists are working away at dismissing the entire literary, spiritual and philosophical foundation of civilization. Those of us who resist this return to barbarism are fortunate to have thinkers like Harry Waton and Constantin Brunner to guide us through the darkness and to help us lay the foundations for the kingdom of heaven on earth.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

And do I need to add? Most people understand "superman" to be a comic book character. But I have no issue with cosplaying, so if you're into that, go for it, buddy.

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

 

[No Robots]

And do I need to add? Most people understand "superman" to be a comic book character. But I have no issue with cosplaying, so if you're into that, go for it, buddy.

The term superman used by Waton is derived from Nietzsche's Übermensch. This is well understood by anyone with even a cursory knowledge of twentieth century philosophy. Waton is using the term superman to counter the fascists. He claims it for those who resist the fascists and join with the great spiritual and intellectual leaders of mankind, most of whom are Jewish.

 

[No Robots]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

 

[No Robots]

^Furthermore, as I've said before, the hyper-skeptics undermine all thought and thereby create an environment for the growth of fascism.

 

[pood]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

So, you are calling the atheists here Fascists, is that right?

 

[GenesisNemesis]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem.

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

Literally the only reason I've responded to you at all is 1. You claimed evolutionary theory leads to imnorality and 2. You've claimed atheists only care about status, power and pleasure. You're so full of shit.

 

[No Robots]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

So, you are calling the atheists here Fascists, is that right?

Correct. More than that. By spreading misinformation about religion and by undermining thought in general, they are the anti-intellectual shock troops of fascism.

 

[pood]

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

So, you are calling the atheists here Fascists, is that right?

Correct. More than that. By spreading misinformation about religion and by undermining thought in general, they are the anti-intellectual shock troops of fascism.

Fascists try to hide their egoism behind a veil of skepticism, criticism and disparagement.

That's odd, you constantly disparage atheists. Also, yes, the fascists who blindly follow their leaders famously are highly skeptical. Lmao what idiocy.

As I said above, it is high time to negate the negations of the militant atheists. If they were content to live their lives, there wouldn't be a problem. But, no, they have to spew bullshit about religion in public fora. Sorry, but no free pass. If you want to be spared from attack, join a protected forum.

So, you are calling the atheists here Fascists, is that right?

Correct. More than that. By spreading misinformation about religion and by undermining thought in general, they are the anti-intellectual shock troops of fascism.

Got it. Post reported.

 

[No Robots]

Literally the only reason I've responded to you at all is 1. You claimed evolutionary theory leads to imnorality and 2. You've claimed atheists only care about status, power and pleasure. You're so full of shit.

1. Dawkins:

From a Darwinian point of view, the problem with sustainability is this: sustainability is all about long-term benefits of the world or of the ecosystem at the expense of short-term benefits. Darwinism encourages precisely the opposite values. Short-term genetic benefit is all that matters in a Darwinian world. Superficially, the values that will have been built into us will have been short-term values not long-term ones.

2. Spinoza

For Atheists are wont greedily to covet rank and riches, which I have always despised, as all who know me are aware.

There are two kinds of atheism: spiritual atheism and materialist atheism. The former is the foundation of all good, truth and justice. The latter is the source of all evil, deception and cruelty. Jesus and the whole of Judaism are of the former. Our modern hyper-skeptics are of the latter.

 

[pood]

Literally the only reason I've responded to you at all is 1. You claimed evolutionary theory leads to imnorality and 2. You've claimed atheists only care about status, power and pleasure. You're so full of shit.

1. Dawkins:

From a Darwinian point of view, the problem with sustainability is this: sustainability is all about long-term benefits of the world or of the ecosystem at the expense of short-term benefits. Darwinism encourages precisely the opposite values. Short-term genetic benefit is all that matters in a Darwinian world. Superficially, the values that will have been built into us will have been short-term values not long-term ones.

While you are busy labeling every atheist here a Fascist, a contemptible slur, you are also taking Dawkins out of context, as anyone who bothers to click to the link will soon learn.

 

[No Robots]

While you are busy labeling every atheist here a Fascist, a contemptible slur, you are also taking Dawkins out of context, as anyone who bothers to click to the link will soon learn.

Carrier:

Evolution has no moral authority. Because it is vicious and heartless, and utterly mindless. So telling the Christian our reason to be moral is that evolution made us that way is not the least bit reassuring. It's like telling them we’re good because an evil apocalyptic baby-eating robot told us to be, and we think he’s really cool so we'll do whatever he says, man!

 

[pood]

While you are busy labeling every atheist here a Fascist, a contemptible slur, you are also taking Dawkins out of context, as anyone who bothers to click to the link will soon learn.

Carrier:

Evolution has no moral authority. Because it is vicious and heartless, and utterly mindless. So telling the Christian our reason to be moral is that evolution made us that way is not the least bit reassuring. It's like telling them we’re good because an evil apocalyptic baby-eating robot told us to be, and we think he’s really cool so we'll do whatever he says, man!

After quoting Dawkins out of context, now you quote Carrier, very likely out of context as well. But it makes no difference. The first clause of his second sentence is wrong, precisely because the second clause is correct. Because evolution is utterly mindless, it cannot be vicious and heartless. Only entities with minds can be that. Only entities with minds, or what passes for minds anyway, can call all atheists Fascists.

Be all that as it may, you called every atheist that posts on this board a Fascist, and your post has been reported.