So in order to rather desperately try to make Killary Clinton look good you have to compare her to an obnoxious oaf like Trump. That says it all
Obama appointed a majority white male cabinet, strongly majority white cabinet. Yet you'd swear that it was composed of nothing but Freddie Grays due to the reaction from many on the right, mainly Trump supporters."At least half" means ">=50%". It is a specific percentage. And my comments are not anti-women, they are anti-gender quotas.
Population share is not a good way to select a cabinet.
Apparently Hillary does.
We could. We could also end up with 99% men. Or any number in between. But to Hillary having more women then men is acceptable but the converse isn't. That is a problem.That way we could just as easily end up with 99% women
I would. Would you be ok with a 99% (95% really since there are only about 20 people there) male cabinet?
First of all, what the hell do you think women have been accepting the the entirety of the existence of this country if not 95% - 100% male only governmentsIt is time for government (and corporate management) to start reflecting the general population demographic. Your bullshit about "merit" operates on the fallacy that it is impossible to have BOTH the best qualified people and diversity. There is almost never just one qualified person for any particular position.
Second, you know damned well that if Clinton appointed 95% of the cabinet positions to women, it would not matter how much evidence there was for their superior qualifications, you would scream bloody murder. Just look at how you speak about Clinton herself.
And just how will Trump's death squads operate in sovereign countries like Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan, Tunisia, or Chechnya? Or will he just become the biggest and baddest Drone Warrior in Chief? And those families have NOT threatened the USA. Talk about killing women and children. Trump is promising to target them on purpose instead of on accident...
FWIW, I have never spoken in favor or bombing Libya nor Syria. Anyway, Trump has hardly sung some magical non-violent tune. Shit, he even coddles violence at his own rallies. Trump doesn't care about women, as he just thinks they are pretty objects (well at least some of them). He is a narcissist, and has promised to continue the ME insanity:
What has pussyfooting around Islam established? Who said anything about genocide? Islam is not so much a religion , but a political ideology. Asking wannabe migrants to Western cultured countries a simple question ought to do it. Ask them : do you support sharia law? An answer in the affirmative must disqualify them from entering a civilised nation.
The above is just another reason for me to conclude you don't know what you are talking about. Clinton is a war hawk and loves to drop bombs on Arabs. She learned that from her husband.
And what does angelo think "the opposite" will accomplish? Bomb the shit out of them, and it will serve only to turn any and all survivors into die-hard enemies of the west. That's how ISIS gets its recruits. Of course angelo names Islam as the enemy... presumably we want us to commit genocide on 1,600,000,000 people. Yeah, angelo - real bright idea.
Gee, that'll be such a successful plan.What has pussyfooting around Islam established? Who said anything about genocide? Islam is not so much a religion , but a political ideology. Asking wannabe migrants to Western cultured countries a simple question ought to do it. Ask them : do you support sharia law? An answer in the affirmative must disqualify them from entering a civilised nation.
The above is just another reason for me to conclude you don't know what you are talking about. Clinton is a war hawk and loves to drop bombs on Arabs. She learned that from her husband.
And what does angelo think "the opposite" will accomplish? Bomb the shit out of them, and it will serve only to turn any and all survivors into die-hard enemies of the west. That's how ISIS gets its recruits. Of course angelo names Islam as the enemy... presumably we want us to commit genocide on 1,600,000,000 people. Yeah, angelo - real bright idea.
Strictly policed, it would keep out barbarians who will never assimilate with infidels. Anything else is committing a slow but inevitable Western culture, not to mention technological suicide!Gee, that'll be such a successful plan.What has pussyfooting around Islam established? Who said anything about genocide? Islam is not so much a religion , but a political ideology. Asking wannabe migrants to Western cultured countries a simple question ought to do it. Ask them : do you support sharia law? An answer in the affirmative must disqualify them from entering a civilised nation.
The above is just another reason for me to conclude you don't know what you are talking about. Clinton is a war hawk and loves to drop bombs on Arabs. She learned that from her husband.
And what does angelo think "the opposite" will accomplish? Bomb the shit out of them, and it will serve only to turn any and all survivors into die-hard enemies of the west. That's how ISIS gets its recruits. Of course angelo names Islam as the enemy... presumably we want us to commit genocide on 1,600,000,000 people. Yeah, angelo - real bright idea.
Good point. We should ship them all to Australia. Nothing there worth saving.
So does that mean he is a sexist SOB because at least half his cabinet weren't women?
Luckily Australia is an island and with both major political parties having a policy of closed, or at least, controlled borders and a limited input of refugees.
No, Hillary is making this into a gender war by stating that "at least half" of her cabinet appointments will be women.
Yes, you actually did.
No, it was Hillary. Why is it so hard to admit that Hillary is wrong on this.
Actually, you would have to assume men and women would equally gravitate toward the types of jobs from which cabinet members are recruited. That is not necessarily the case even if educational opportunities are equal (and in fact due to affirmative action and gender-based scholarships and grants women have more educational opportunities than men). If the pool from which you recruit cabinet members is not equal you can't expect the cabinet to be, unless you discriminate by gender, as she is pledging to do.
Nah, it's people like you who insist in misinterpretation that cause such kerfuffles.
Are you really implicitly claiming that there is likely to be fewer Cabinet-qualified women in the pools compared to men?
