In a war between NATO and Russia, the remnants of your decrepit navy won't last long. Russia can't even deal with Ukraine's Sea Babies.
Your shiny and mighty Navy won't last much longer.
Check the naval doctrines.
Your naval strike doctrine is big, fast, long range, heavy missiles. They are launched either by ships or by land based heavy bombers. That limits your strike range to a few hundred miles around your fleet and a considerably greater distance from the land bases that operate the heavy bombers. Observe what's happening in Ukraine--most such missiles fired by either side are being shot down.
US strike doctrine is much smaller, slower, shorter range missiles that fly very, very low. Doesn't matter how good your SAMs are until you have line of sight on the target and against something like the Harpoon that's pretty short. But note that our missiles can be carried by naval aircraft. That means the US fleet can strike targets much farther away than the Russian fleet--sure, each missile isn't as fearsome but they'll actually get through. Look what happened to the Moskova--you couldn't successfully engage a paltry two missiles despite all the big, long range SAMs on that ship. And note that you have no naval equivalent to your A-50s, your defense problem is huge.
Your fleet's missiles will never do anything because you'll never get in range. All you have are the bombers and they're worthless without a target. Even if your satellites spot a carrier that doesn't mean you have data precise enough to shoot with hours later--to do that you have to get a radar in range and that means sending out recon aircraft that can neither hide nor defend themselves.
You built ships meant to fight, we built ships meant to defend the carrier so it's aircraft can fight. Who do you think has the better defense?!