• Welcome to the Internet Infidels Discussion Board.

How should west respond to Russian invasion of Ukraine?

 
 
 
Bronzeage said:
It's cute how you try to change the subject when you know I'm right.
Click to expand...
I am not changing the subject. And it is you who who is cute talking about US attacking random Wildberris in Russia when Iran destroyed all American Bases in the Middle East.
You do understand that bombing WB is not an achievement?
Russia can set on fire warehouses in Baltic States and Ukraine in no time?
Even in US a little bit harder, but we can do that too.
 
Last edited:
Bronzeage said:
Ukrainian grain harvest is Ukraine will have a grain harvest. Russian grain will go to seed in the field. Diesel prices mean Russian farmers will lose money if they harvest the grain, so it stays in the field.
Click to expand...
What are you smoking? Seriously what shit are you smoking?
Ukraine literally can't export anything, period.
Russia is going to harvest just fine. There is no problem with diesel.
 
Last edited:
Speaking of success rate of Ukrainian drones. Apparently it is pretty low - 1%
Report says that's including FPV drones which I doubt because success rate of these is much higher about 10%
Of course these drones are dirt cheap, but still, only 1%
 
bilby said:
You can believe that diesel is available; But belief doesn't move trucks, or tractors, or harvesters.
Click to expand...
I can see it moves them just fine.
I don't drive but gasoline spiked 3x normal price resently. Diesel not so much.
but price fell lately. I can walk to gas station if you want and check.
In any case, prices are higher in Ukraine and in Kharkov oblast gas-stations were systematically destroyed. Apparently idea was to make it harder for nazis to launch drones from there.

Personally, I don't really understand how long range strikes with these slow moving shit planes is still possible. This should have been dealt with already. Short range I understand. But long range should not be happening. But maybe 1% is all that is needed to maintain the narrative.
 
US-ukro-scum regularly launch ~300 drones and it results in few successful hits.
If it is one big WB warehouse then one can say it's a success.
My wild guess each of these shit-planes cost US-EU around $50K.
So it's $15M, OK, not that expensive.
But Ukraine loses 30mil a day from Odessa Port not working.
And yes it is not going to work ever for Ukraine. Unlike these russian refineries, Ukrainian ports are done
 
Last edited:
Speaking of 1% success rate. One of the reason US-ukro-scum keep conducting long range strikes was that targets which were close got so much protection that it made sense to try to fly farther for unprotected targets.
 
And again, the reason why Odessa port was not put out of commission was the African and Indian friends which needed ukrainin grain, so your constant yapping about Ukraine closing Black Sea for Russia was stupid. But once ukro-scum hit russian grain ship, we got excuse to close Black Sea for good and India/Africa can't protest anymore.
Russia can ship grain without Black Sea. we still have Baltic sea, Kaia Kallas can talk shit all day long but NATO cannot attack ships under russian flags.

You are fucked, all because your stupid clown decided to attack russian grain ship.
You are fucked in Black Sea and you are fucked in Hormuz. You stupid fucks, started two wars and are losing both.
 
Last edited:
And EU shitheads are now starting talking about the fact that EU has no air defense. Estonian shitheads are planning to ....... burn their country and evacuate to Finland :) this is their plan for war with Russia.
 
We don't really know what you stupid fucks were doing during Obama administration.
My guess that Obama was skeptical about ability of Ukraine to withstand war with Russia right after the nazi coup. So you took the time to prepare war with Russia. It took Obama, then first Trump administration and half of the Biden terms to fully nazify the ukrainian regime for war with Russia.
Yeah, 8 years, same amount of time it took for Hitler to prepare for war with Russia.
 
barbos said:
Speaking of 1% success rate. One of the reason US-ukro-scum keep conducting long range strikes was that targets which were close got so much protection that it made sense to try to fly farther for unprotected targets.
Click to expand...

Holy Christ on a popsicle! You got something right! Russia is the biggest country in the world and can't protect all it's assets. Remember, the war could end tomorrow in very favorable terms to Russia if your side wanted peace.
 
Harry Bosch said:
Holy Christ on a popsicle! You got something right! Russia is the biggest country in the world and can't protect all it's assets.
Click to expand...
That's not what I am saying. I think we can protect Russia from these wooden shit-planes just fine.
Real missiles could be a different matter, but these shit planes should be shot down with 100% rate.
 
Also there is an unfortunate climate change incident with low water levels of Danube river which makes navigation over it very problematic. But that's not the only problem. Remembr Kerch Bridge?
It's still standing and operating but do you know what is not standing? the bridge Kiev regime was thought could be used to connect Odessa to Romanian Port of Constanta.
You stupid fucks.
 
barbos said:
And EU shitheads are now starting talking about the fact that EU has no air defense. Estonian shitheads are planning to ....... burn their country and evacuate to Finland :) this is their plan for war with Russia.
Click to expand...
Its been four years and no victory. Russia does not fly advanced fighters over Ukraine for fear of being shot down.

Hmmm ...

Putin always picks fights with weaker adversarial. Georgia. Crimea. He underestimated Ukraine and got a foot kicked up his ass. Even without the USA imagine what it would be like to face the combined sea, air, and land forces of NATO, considering the difficulty Russia has with just Ukraine. Poland remembers WWII and the Russ din invasion, and atrocities.

Threatening tiny Estonia, it takes a rel man to do that. A real tough guy.

Estonia faces a low immediate risk of a conventional military invasion by Russia because Russian forces remain tied down in Ukraine. However, Estonia takes long-term threats seriously, actively upgrading its defenses, preparing for hybrid warfare, and relying on its status as a NATO member.
Click to expand...

Old news.

Yes, Russia flies advanced tactical jets like the Su-35, Su-30SM, and Su-34, as well as its fifth-generation Su-57 stealth fighter, near and over contested areas of Ukraine. However, heavy Ukrainian air defenses limit direct, deep penetration, forcing these advanced aircraft to mostly use standoff weapons or operate from a distance. You can read a broader overview of the air conflict on the Wikipedia Aerial warfare in the Russo-Ukrainian war page.
Click to expand...

At this point Putin must feel like a limp dick. Maybe Viagra will help.
 
Russian oil refining fell in July to its lowest level in more than two decades
Moscow Times said:
Refineries processed an estimated 3.6 million barrels of crude per day last month, the lowest level since May 2002, according to EA Analytics data cited by Bloomberg. That was roughly one-third below the seasonal norm.

Russian refineries processed an average of between 5.3 million and 5.6 million barrels per day during the same period of the year between 2020 and 2025.
Click to expand...
 
barbos said:
Just because your link does not mention it does not mean others do not too.
Click to expand...
Okay. Provide them.

barbos said:
Yes, germans itself came up with that theory, because damn thing did not (apparently) have an actual explosive, just a detonator which was not even connected either.
It's "russian" drones in Poland kind of shit over again.
Click to expand...
Uh huh.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom