J842P
Veteran Member
Derec votes Democratic.
I highly doubt that, or at best am highly skeptical of this claim.
Why? Most of his political positions are center right, which is exactly the mainstream of the Democratic party.
Derec votes Democratic.
I highly doubt that, or at best am highly skeptical of this claim.
They are not enforcing federal law. They are merely expect to honor immigration detainers so that ICE can take custody of the illegals who are to be deported. What's wrong with that?Why should States be forced to enforce Federal law?
States are still subject to federal law, including immigration law. The supremacy clause does not only apply to things liberals like such as gay marriage or environmental regulations.What happened to the States' rights people on the right?
Deporting illegals is not "bigotry and hate".That only applies when it's the States enforcing bigotry and hate contrary to federal law.
I guess everybody to the right of Elizabeth Warren is a "neo-Nazi" to you ...Neo-nazis don't mind being hypocritical about it, especially now that they have license to invent their own facts.
Not a Republican. Also, unlike you, I can spell.Derec and other repugnicans don't actually have princibles or values.
Not always, but mostly. For example, I voted for Obama twice.I highly doubt that, or at best am highly skeptical of this claim.
Lesser of two evils. although Democrats keep working hard on reducing that evilness gap.It's not impossible, but it makes me wonder how he can rationalize that decision.
They are not enforcing federal law. They are merely expect to honor immigration detainers so that ICE can take custody of the illegals who are to be deported. What's wrong with that?
For example, had San Francisco honored such a detainer against an illegal Mexcian a young woman would still be alive.
States are still subject to federal law, including immigration law. The supremacy clause does not only apply to things liberals like such as gay marriage or environmental regulations.What happened to the States' rights people on the right?
- - - Updated - - -
Deporting illegals is not "bigotry and hate".That only applies when it's the States enforcing bigotry and hate contrary to federal law.
I guess everybody to the right of Elizabeth Warren is a "neo-Nazi" to you ...Neo-nazis don't mind being hypocritical about it, especially now that they have license to invent their own facts.
- - - Updated - - -
Not a Republican. Also, unlike you, I can spell.Derec and other repugnicans don't actually have princibles or values.
- - - Updated - - -
Not always, but mostly. For example, I voted for Obama twice.I highly doubt that, or at best am highly skeptical of this claim.
That's why I am so critical of him/them when they do something as mindbogglingly stupid as blocking pipelines or releasing terrorists from prison.
- - - Updated - - -
Lesser of two evils. although Democrats keep working hard on reducing that evilness gap.It's not impossible, but it makes me wonder how he can rationalize that decision.
They are not enforcing federal law. They are merely expect to honor immigration detainers so that ICE can take custody of the illegals who are to be deported. What's wrong with that?
For example, had San Francisco honored such a detainer against an illegal Mexcian a young woman would still be alive.
States are still subject to federal law, including immigration law. The supremacy clause does not only apply to things liberals like such as gay marriage or environmental regulations.What happened to the States' rights people on the right?
- - - Updated - - -
Deporting illegals is not "bigotry and hate".That only applies when it's the States enforcing bigotry and hate contrary to federal law.
I guess everybody to the right of Elizabeth Warren is a "neo-Nazi" to you ...Neo-nazis don't mind being hypocritical about it, especially now that they have license to invent their own facts.
- - - Updated - - -
Not a Republican. Also, unlike you, I can spell.[1]Derec and other repugnicans don't actually have princibles or values.
- - - Updated - - -
Not always, but mostly. For example, I voted for Obama twice. [2]I highly doubt that, or at best am highly skeptical of this claim.
That's why I am so critical of him/them when they do something as mindbogglingly stupid as blocking pipelines or releasing terrorists from prison. [3]
- - - Updated - - -
Lesser of two evils. although Democrats keep working hard on reducing that evilness gap.It's not impossible, but it makes me wonder how he can rationalize that decision.
Ripping a mother away from her two children because she came here illegally when she was fourteen is not only extremely hateful but downright evil.
Having procreated should not make one exempt from deportation. Besides, the kids can go with her. Nobody is forcing them apart.Ripping a mother away from her two children
She not only came here illegally, she also committed identity fraud. She really should have been deported years ago, but the Obama administration ignored the deportation order.because she came here illegally when she was fourteen is not only extremely hateful but downright evil.
Having procreated should not make one exempt from deportation. Besides, the kids can go with her. Nobody is forcing them apart.
She not only came here illegally, she also committed identity fraud. She really should have been deported years ago, but the Obama administration ignored the deportation order.because she came here illegally when she was fourteen is not only extremely hateful but downright evil.
Having procreated should not make one exempt from deportation. Besides, the kids can go with her. Nobody is forcing them apart.
She not only came here illegally, she also committed identity fraud. She really should have been deported years ago, but the Obama administration ignored the deportation order.
Look at the reality: The kids are teens. They probably speak little Spanish. You will have in effect turned them into high school dropouts.
You are in effect asking to wreck the lives of two completely innocent American citizens over a very minor act by one of their parents. You are evil.
Look at the reality: The kids are teens. They probably speak little Spanish. You will have in effect turned them into high school dropouts.
You are in effect asking to wreck the lives of two completely innocent American citizens over a very minor act by one of their parents. You are evil.
Completely agree. And note the minor act she committed was necessary to obtain gainful employment to support her two (young at the time) kids. No one was actually victimized by the act.
The law should be used as a tool to reduce or prevent harm or potential harm to victims, not create victims with zero reduction in harm to anyone else.
Having procreated should not make one exempt from deportation. Besides, the kids can go with her. Nobody is forcing them apart.
She not only came here illegally, she also committed identity fraud. She really should have been deported years ago, but the Obama administration ignored the deportation order.because she came here illegally when she was fourteen is not only extremely hateful but downright evil.
Well, at least your country is now safe from hard working mothers. I'm pretty sure that this one person was the stumbling block which was preventing America from being great again and it's smooth sailing from here.
Completely agree. And note the minor act she committed was necessary to obtain gainful employment to support her two (young at the time) kids. No one was actually victimized by the act.
The law should be used as a tool to reduce or prevent harm or potential harm to victims, not create victims with zero reduction in harm to anyone else.
If she used somebody's social security number she caused them some headaches with the IRS. There is a victim, but nowhere near the harm that would be inflicted on her children.
And you should look at the reality. If you let her stay just because she procreated it gives illegals a very easy way to become deportation-proof: just procreate. It would merely incentivize millions more fertile Mexican and Central American illegals to flood across the border and start having children.Look at the reality: The kids are teens. They probably speak little Spanish. You will have in effect turned them into high school dropouts.
She was convicted of a felony. Hardly a "very minor act". And you are in effect asking to make illegals who procreate deportation-proof. I think that is the bigger evil here.You are in effect asking to wreck the lives of two completely innocent American citizens over a very minor act by one of their parents. You are evil.
And you should look at the reality. If you let her stay just because she procreated it gives illegals a very easy way to become deportation-proof: just procreate. It would merely incentivize millions more fertile Mexican and Central American illegals to flood across the border and start having children.
So you want 3rd world illegals to come here because of your anti-non-hispanic-white bigotry. And yet you call me a bigot. Priceless left wing hypocrisy.Good deal. Maybe some day soon they will outnumber self-interested, sexually frustrated white male bigots.![]()
So you want 3rd world illegals to come here because of your anti-non-hispanic-white bigotry.Good deal. Maybe some day soon they will outnumber self-interested, sexually frustrated white male bigots.![]()
And yet you call me a bigot. Priceless left wing hypocrisy.
I am no psychologist but I still think I got you.Don't quit your day job Derec. You'll never make it as a psychologist.
There are a lot of self-hating white people on the left.I happen to be an old hjeterosexual, married, relatively well-off white male
No I have not.who was not conditioned in childhood to hate and fear "others" as you obviously have been.
Bullshit! Just because I reject the left-wing orthodoxy does not make me a bigot. I do not want US to become part of Latin America through mass migration of hispanics. I don't want Europe to become Islamic through mass migration of Muslims. Both of these things are true. But they are not bigoted stances. I would not want, for example, Japan to lose its identity to mass migration either. Even if that mass migration was by European whites like me. I would not want Mexico to lose it's identity either through mass migration from somewhere else. I like tacos. I don't mind taco trucks. I just don't want taco trucks on every corner, that's all. Oh, and taco truck operators should be legal and learn English. That doesn't mean they should forget Spanish, but they should learn English.Yes, if your posts are honest expressions of your beliefs, you ARE a bigot.
And yet I am sure you support million of fundamentalist Muslim migrants flooding into Europe and islamicizing it.The very sort that I despise, just as I despise muslim religious terrorist bigots who are your exact mirror image.
Absolutely true - rejection of left wing orthodoxy (whatever that means) does not make you a bigot. However, your persistent ignorant and fear-driven posts about muslims, immigrants and black people do make you appear bigoted. Amd statements like " I do not want US to become part of Latin America through mass migration of hispanics. " reinforce that impression.Bullshit! Just because I reject the left-wing orthodoxy does not make me a bigot.
I am no psychologist but I still think I got you.
I happen to be an old hjeterosexual, married, relatively well-off white male
There are a lot of self-hating white people on the left.
Example, Lena Dunham. LENA DUNHAM: EXTINCTION OF WHITE MEN WOULD PROMPT ‘EVOLUTION OF BETTER MEN’
Or Noel Ignatiev. Harvard professor argues for 'abolishing' white race
And many others.
who was not conditioned in childhood to hate and fear "others" as you obviously have been.
No I have not.
Yes, if your posts are honest expressions of your beliefs, you ARE a bigot.
Bullshit!
Elixir said:The very sort that I despise, just as I despise muslim religious terrorist bigots who are your exact mirror image.
Derec said:And yet I am sure you support million of fundamentalist Muslim migrants flooding into Europe and islamicizing it.