I've never met a person arguing for the existence of "races" who didn't think that their race was superior to the "other races." Has anyone been in discussions where this was not the case?
Races exist. What are Neanderthals? And Denisovians?
I've never met a person arguing for the existence of "races" who didn't think that their race was superior to the "other races." Has anyone been in discussions where this was not the case?
both Neanderthals and Denisovians are extinct, hence don't exist.I've never met a person arguing for the existence of "races" who didn't think that their race was superior to the "other races." Has anyone been in discussions where this was not the case?
Races exist. What are Neanderthals? And Denisovians?
Looks like there is no controversy here. Bone marrow match is hard to find even without mixing and very hard to find for mixed race children.Is there anyone who is not an ideologue either way who has solid contextualized research about bone marrow donors?
I think the point was to demonstrate that races exist, not to advocate race purity.Again, this is such a niche effect of inter "racial" children that even if true it is mostly so what.
The answer it seems (according to google) yes, they would have a better chance. Of course it would depend on how moderately small that group is.Let's say you had a moderately small not freshly outbred (but not inbred like Appalachian hicks, Pakistanis or hyper orthodox Jews) population. Would they have a better chance of having donors than a family of one "white" English/Russian/Italian/Czech grandparent each?
Remember, it’s an inconsequential fluke that global IQ tracks with global wealth. It’s just the wealthy countries are hoarding all the magic dirt, leaving low IQ countries with tragic dirt. Liberal creationists really need you to believe that.
Newsflash: Wealth causally impacts every aspect of the environment, many of which in turn impact the intellectual and academic development reflected by IQ tests. IOW, your own facts are evidence against your position, and you're incapable of seeing it. If I were a racist like yourself, I would use your proven lack of intellect to infer your race.
Remember, race does not exist.
Genetic diversity, not race.
Remember, race does not exist.
Genetic diversity, not race.
Call it race. Call it population groups. Call it genetic diversity. But please don't imagine that humans were granted a divine dispensation from the implications of evolution and natural selection.
Yeah, the genetics were so terrible that southern US states had to pass laws to keep African Americans from learning how to read. And we weren't talking about some petty misdemeanor. We are talking punishment of flogging.Call it race. Call it population groups. Call it genetic diversity. But please don't imagine that humans were granted a divine dispensation from the implications of evolution and natural selection.
... mutts are more likely to be healthy, survivable, and intelligent.
Call it race. Call it population groups. Call it genetic diversity. But please don't imagine that humans were granted a divine dispensation from the implications of evolution and natural selection.
First generation only. They are less likely to get two copies of some recessive gene. Later generations can actually be less healthy because they may lose gene complexes which only work together. In any case, both effects are rather small in real life. But yeah both inbreeding and out-breeding have benefits.mutts are more likely to be healthy, survivable, and intelligent.
both Neanderthals and Denisovians are extinct, hence don't exist.I've never met a person arguing for the existence of "races" who didn't think that their race was superior to the "other races." Has anyone been in discussions where this was not the case?
Races exist. What are Neanderthals? And Denisovians?
First generation only. They are less likely to get two copies of some recessive gene. Later generations can actually be less healthy because they may lose gene complexes which only work together. In any case, both effects are rather small in real life. But yeah both inbreeding and out-breeding have benefits.mutts are more likely to be healthy, survivable, and intelligent.
Gene complexes require fair level of small group inbreeding and are developed on a time scale on which races/ethnic groups are developed.First generation only. They are less likely to get two copies of some recessive gene. Later generations can actually be less healthy because they may lose gene complexes which only work together. In any case, both effects are rather small in real life. But yeah both inbreeding and out-breeding have benefits.mutts are more likely to be healthy, survivable, and intelligent.
And thus the environment will, at some fairly brisk rate, weed out the individuals for whom the complex is broken, or even locating new synergistic complexes.
For every complex that is broken, there are opportunities that new complexes can be located.
Gene complexes require fair level of small group inbreeding and are developed on a time scale on which races/ethnic groups are developed.And thus the environment will, at some fairly brisk rate, weed out the individuals for whom the complex is broken, or even locating new synergistic complexes.
For every complex that is broken, there are opportunities that new complexes can be located.
We don't have such conditions anymore.
Anyway my point was that out-breeding is not an unarguably good thing.
First generation has none of the gene complexes broken, second have some broken and then more and more.