Underseer
Contributor
Why do we have to have this same conversation over and over again?
Oh, right. Because racists have an obvious motive to deny that racism exists.
some fans have objected, saying that the original character's identity is being changed.
This is the key to their racism, treating skin color as a defining feature of a person's identity. People of all political stripes makes this assumption, including in much of left-wing identity politics (e.g. the concept of "white privilege"), and its always racist.
Coming close to this look is to me part of the character, one should avoid casting people that look nothing like the established pattern.
James Bond's friend, Felix Leiter, was a blond surfer-dude in the books. But in the movies he's been blond, brunette, and black. Yet, the 'defining' points of Leiter's character is that he's CIA, he's subordinate to Bond, and he provides tech support before/cleanup after shootings. No one really seems to find his hair or skin color a defining characteristic. Whatever he looks like in the heads of readers, they seem to accept just about any actor as the former-Marine friend of Bond.While race per se shouldn't be a defining characteristic we do have a reasonable idea of what she looks like from the movies. Coming close to this look is to me part of the character,
This is the key to their racism, treating skin color as a defining feature of a person's identity. People of all political stripes makes this assumption, including in much of left-wing identity politics (e.g. the concept of "white privilege"), and its always racist.
While race per se shouldn't be a defining characteristic we do have a reasonable idea of what she looks like from the movies. Coming close to this look is to me part of the character, one should avoid casting people that look nothing like the established pattern.
I presume there were probably some people that didn't accept that.If people could accept a female Starbuck, why not a black Hermione?
Jon Oliver's show covered this issue pretty well.Jake Gyllenhaal, of Swedish descent, played the Prince of Persia. How about Johnny Depp as Tonto? Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses.
Where do we draw the line with this stuff?
If people could accept a female Starbuck, why not a black Hermione?
Jake Gyllenhaal, of Swedish descent, played the Prince of Persia. How about Johnny Depp as Tonto? Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses.
Where do we draw the line with this stuff?
While race per se shouldn't be a defining characteristic we do have a reasonable idea of what she looks like from the movies. Coming close to this look is to me part of the character, one should avoid casting people that look nothing like the established pattern.
If people could accept a female Starbuck, why not a black Hermione?
Jake Gyllenhaal, of Swedish descent, played the Prince of Persia. How about Johnny Depp as Tonto? Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses.
Where do we draw the line with this stuff?
I don't think Starbuck counts--that was in effect a reboot. As such, you can remake the characters freely.

I presume there were probably some people that didn't accept that.
Shadowy Man said:Jake Gyllenhaal, of Swedish descent, played the Prince of Persia. How about Johnny Depp as Tonto? Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses.
Where do we draw the line with this stuff?
Are they remaking Harry Potter and Somebody's Stones?If people could accept a female Starbuck, why not a black Hermione?
Jake Gyllenhaal, of Swedish descent, played the Prince of Persia. How about Johnny Depp as Tonto? Memoirs of a Geisha had Chinese actresses.
Where do we draw the line with this stuff?
I don't think Starbuck counts--that was in effect a reboot. As such, you can remake the characters freely.
The fact that it started out as a non-visual medium (book) and doesn't focus on race makes it especially hard for me to care at all about who is cast to play the role. It bothers me more when they suddenly take a character that started out in a visual medium and do it (or in the case where race is part of the story). If they are going to change the race of a well known cultural icon, such as say making Superman Asian, they should at least significantly modify the story to go with it or introduce a new character and build it to the same iconic status.
My understanding was there was at some point a black Nick Fury in the comics?I believe, unsupported of course, that the issue is more racial than it is specific to established choices. If Hermione were cast as a little black girl in the movies, there'd probably still be outrage and people saying "that's not how I pictured her", even though her race isn't mentioned in the book. Look what happened with Rue in Hunger Games, even though she was basically described as black.
What about Dr. Who? A character who by definition changes form every couple of years. I'm sure there'll be outrage if The Doctor were ever cast as black, or, god forbid, a woman.
- - - Updated - - -
The fact that it started out as a non-visual medium (book) and doesn't focus on race makes it especially hard for me to care at all about who is cast to play the role. It bothers me more when they suddenly take a character that started out in a visual medium and do it (or in the case where race is part of the story). If they are going to change the race of a well known cultural icon, such as say making Superman Asian, they should at least significantly modify the story to go with it or introduce a new character and build it to the same iconic status.
Was there a reason given in the Marvel movies why Nick Fury was played by Samuel Jackson?
My understanding was there was at some point a black Nick Fury in the comics?I believe, unsupported of course, that the issue is more racial than it is specific to established choices. If Hermione were cast as a little black girl in the movies, there'd probably still be outrage and people saying "that's not how I pictured her", even though her race isn't mentioned in the book. Look what happened with Rue in Hunger Games, even though she was basically described as black.
What about Dr. Who? A character who by definition changes form every couple of years. I'm sure there'll be outrage if The Doctor were ever cast as black, or, god forbid, a woman.
- - - Updated - - -
Was there a reason given in the Marvel movies why Nick Fury was played by Samuel Jackson?
In Marvel Ultimate series he's black.My understanding was there was at some point a black Nick Fury in the comics?
Not to my knowledge, at least not before SLJ portrayed him on the screen.
This may be a rare case of white people not giving a fuck about something so trite. Speaks well of comic book nerds.My understanding was there was at some point a black Nick Fury in the comics?
Not to my knowledge, at least not before SLJ portrayed him on the screen. He is still typically portrayed as white in the comics, the one exception I know if was in an issue of Deadpool a couple of years ago (I think it was 2014), Deadpool goes back in time, and brings Dazzler back from the '80s. She sees a poster with Nick Fury on it and asks "When did Nick Fury turn into a black guy?"
ETA: I'm not aware of any comic book fans who were upset with SLJ portraying Nick Fury in the movies, despite the fact that he is almost always white in the comics.
In Marvel Ultimate series he's black.Not to my knowledge, at least not before SLJ portrayed him on the screen.
According to the Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Nick_Fury
he was Designed specifically to look like Samuel Jackson, before that actor portrayed him in the movies.
I don't even know what they are, but I knew someone at IIDB or FRDB or TF or TBA at some point mentioned that.In Marvel Ultimate series he's black.
According to the Wiki: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ultimate_Nick_Fury
he was Designed specifically to look like Samuel Jackson, before that actor portrayed him in the movies.
That would explain it, I haven't read many of those titles.