You mean there actually was an incident? The initial reporting looked far more like a setup.
I don't see indecent exposure here, anyway.
There's still no actual evidence that she was even
there, a claim that the facility itself has always denied. There's just the word of the LAPD, which was not present at the scene, and the solemn word of anti-Trans activist and tabloid "reporter " Andy Ngo, who
also wasn't present at the scene. I believe that they are showing their hand when they describe Agee Melager as a "known sex offender". What they mean is that they've arrested her before for allegedly very similar offenses, making her a convenient target for further harassment on their part. Once you're in their rolodex, you're never safe again.
To say nothing of the NY Post, which is preposterously claiming that the accused, who has refused to grant interviews to
anyone, gave them a self-incriminating exclusive in conversation with a reporter that most trans folks in the country would immediately recognize as a dangerous interlocutor. Really? If you were accused of a crime, would you give an exclusive interview to a tabloid, and to no other entity?