March for women. A message from Conservatives

[TSwizzle]

On the other hand, for all of his faults, I cannot remember any video of Clinton

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

- - - Updated - - -

Sexual predator Bill Clinton gets a free pass because one the victims was "consenting" and we should ignore the rest of his history of sexual misconduct ? Dear oh dear.

You asked "Does Bill Clinton come into this at all ?" and I provided a place.

Not really.

 

[Ford]

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

Here's an idea:

Start a thread about it and quit trying to change the subject in this one.

 

[TSwizzle]

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

Here's an idea:

Start a thread about it and quit trying to change the subject in this one.

Here's an idea, jog on.

 

[Ford]

Here's an idea:

Start a thread about it and quit trying to change the subject in this one.

Here's an idea, jog on.

No, sorry champ. I'll ask again...why are you so desperate to change the subject here? You part of the He Man Women Hater's Club or something?

 

[bilby]

Yes, I was wondering why there were no marches back then. I am wondering why misogyny never seemed to be mentioned during Clinton's administration.

I have no idea why you weren't paying attention 20+ years ago. Possibly you were too involved with your toilet training then.

Perhaps he still is.

It would explain a lot.

 

[laughing dog]

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

That is a tu quoque fallacy.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Yes, I was wondering why there were no marches back then. I am wondering why misogyny never seemed to be mentioned during Clinton's administration.

I have no idea why you weren't paying attention 20+ years ago. Possibly you were too involved with your toilet training then.

On the other hand, for all of his faults, I cannot remember any video of Clinton bragging about sexually assaulting women--or bragging about walking in on minor girls changing clothes. As a muddled aged douchebag who thought he had the right because he owned the pagent, which somehow he had confused with scymtually owning the contestants .

It's altogether possible that Bill Clinton engaged in such blatant and disgusting behavior but there is no actual video of him bragging about it.

And that whole "consensual adults" thing.

- - - Updated - - -

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

Yes he got a blow job from an adult woman who wanted to give him a blow job. Now tell us what law did he break with this act.

Now that we have established the facts and know what happened afterwards, why the derail?

 

[TSwizzle]

You do remember the very serious and credible allegations against him though right ? Were you outraged at all ?

Yes he got a blow job from an adult woman who wanted to give him a blow job. Now tell us what law did he break with this act.

I suppose the perjury stuff doesn't count in the Lewinsky case (I assume that is what you are referring to) but aside from his predatory behavior towards the young girl that brought the mail, Bill Clinton has demonstrated questionable attitudes toward women over a very long period of time, yes ?

 

[Derec]

I suppose the perjury stuff doesn't count in the Lewinsky case (I assume that is what you are referring to)

Since it was a civil case it really should not. The whole thing was a political witch hunt that made Clinton more popular in the end.

but aside from his predatory behavior towards the young girl that brought the mail,

Predatory? What evidence is there of it. And she was an adult woman, not a "young girl".

Bill Clinton has demonstrated questionable attitudes toward women over a very long period of time, yes ?

I don't think any claims of actual wrongdoing (like Juanita Broderick) were ever substantiated, right? There are many things that were bad about Clinton presidency, but we should not focus on his personal life. That's between him and Hillary.

 

[Derec]

Speaking of the women's march, one of the chief organizers is an Islamist who supports Sharia law and Hamas.

Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas

 

[laughing dog]

Speaking of the women's march, one of the chief organizers is an Islamist who supports Sharia law and Hamas.

Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas

Not only is this irrelevant to the March and its purpose, the entire "report" is misleading. There is no evidence that Ms. Sarsour supports Sharia Law in its entirety. The only evidence is a tweet about not paying interest under Sharia Law.

 

[Derec]

Not only is this irrelevant to the March and its purpose, the entire "report" is misleading. There is no evidence that Ms. Sarsour supports Sharia Law in its entirety. The only evidence is a tweet about not paying interest under Sharia Law.

It the carrot she uses to sell Sharia Law to the rubes on the Left. Obviously she being an Islamoist knows full well what Sharia Law is, and if she meant to distance herself from Sharia Law in its entirety she would have phrased her tweets differently.

 

[Tom Sawyer]

Speaking of the women's march, one of the chief organizers is an Islamist who supports Sharia law and Hamas.

Organizer For DC Women’s March, Linda Sarsour Is Pro Sharia Law with Ties To Hamas

Not only is this irrelevant to the March and its purpose, the entire "report" is misleading. There is no evidence that Ms. Sarsour supports Sharia Law in its entirety. The only evidence is a tweet about not paying interest under Sharia Law.

But she made an offhand comment two years ago which wasn't a complete repudiation and condemnation of Islam. I think we can all agree that this means that the entire rationale of the Women's March is invalidated and Donald Trump had ten thousand million devoted fans packing downtown Washington cheering his inauguration. I get that we all have emotional ties to the opposite view, but Derec did find the smoking gun here and we need to accept iron clad evidence that we were wrong even when we don't wish to do so.

 

[Nice Squirrel]

Not only is this irrelevant to the March and its purpose, the entire "report" is misleading. There is no evidence that Ms. Sarsour supports Sharia Law in its entirety. The only evidence is a tweet about not paying interest under Sharia Law.

It the carrot she uses to sell Sharia Law to the rubes on the Left. Obviously she being an Islamoist knows full well what Sharia Law is, and if she meant to distance herself from Sharia Law in its entirety she would have phrased her tweets differently.

I will call my 1000 friends who marched in protest and tell them that they were marching not for the reasons they think they for, but because they hate Joos.

Thanks Derec.

 

[laughing dog]

Not only is this irrelevant to the March and its purpose, the entire "report" is misleading. There is no evidence that Ms. Sarsour supports Sharia Law in its entirety. The only evidence is a tweet about not paying interest under Sharia Law.

It the carrot she uses to sell Sharia Law to the rubes on the Left. Obviously she being an Islamoist knows full well what Sharia Law is, and if she meant to distance herself from Sharia Law in its entirety she would have phrased her tweets differently.

This is only evidence of your mistaken but fascinating belief that you think you can read the mind of a woman.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

Yes he got a blow job from an adult woman who wanted to give him a blow job. Now tell us what law did he break with this act.

I suppose the perjury stuff doesn't count in the Lewinsky case (I assume that is what you are referring to) but aside from his predatory behavior towards the young girl that brought the mail, Bill Clinton has demonstrated questionable attitudes toward women over a very long period of time, yes ?

Lewinsky wasn't perjury. The attorneys messed up and define "sex" as penis-in-vagina and Clinton took advantage of their mistake.

 

[Loren Pechtel]

I don't think any claims of actual wrongdoing (like Juanita Broderick) were ever substantiated, right? There are many things that were bad about Clinton presidency, but we should not focus on his personal life. That's between him and Hillary.

That's my impression, also. Sticking it in inappropriate places, yes. Forcing women, no. When you're powerful and a reasonable person there's plenty of willing pussy, why force anyone?

 

[Shadowy Man]

But she made an offhand comment two years ago which wasn't a complete repudiation and condemnation of Islam. I think we can all agree that this means that the entire rationale of the Women's March is invalidated and Donald Trump had ten thousand million devoted fans packing downtown Washington cheering his inauguration.

Yes, because we all know that we hold everyone to the tweets they made years ago, you know, like we do with Donald Trump.

 

[Angry Floof]

But she made an offhand comment two years ago which wasn't a complete repudiation and condemnation of Islam. I think we can all agree that this means that the entire rationale of the Women's March is invalidated and Donald Trump had ten thousand million devoted fans packing downtown Washington cheering his inauguration.

Yes, because we all know that we hold everyone to the tweets they made years ago, you know, like we do with Donald Trump.

Yes, because the US President shouldn't be held to the highest level of accountability or anything.

He's not a pubescent internet troll. He's not a rap star. He's the fucking President. We have the right to demand an explanation for what he changes his mind about. We have the right to call him out for discrepancies.

Only conservatives believe individual celebrities have the same kind of power as politicians and the people who buy them. They do have some influence, and we do hold them accountable for using that influence to defraud people (Gwyneth Paltrow's ilk). But as movie stars and singers, they are citizens who have as much right as anyone to speak publicly about their views however stupid. These people do not make laws or policies.

When celebrities step into public office or turn their life's work to activism instead of show business, then you might have a point. Otherwise, you might as well have a cow about Mrs. Stuart Brimley from Milwaukee, who wrote a scathing Facebook comment this morning for her very liberal scrapbooking group, calling Donald a "vacuous oaf" among other things, and suggesting he could use a cup of the herbal tea her husband drank just before he died, God rest his soul. She included a winky smiley. Damning evidence indeed.

RAGE! LEFT WING IDEOLOGY IS HYPOCRITICAL!

The conservative outrage and focus on celebrities is comical considering all they will accept without question in the POTUS, the highest office, when there's a Republican in it.

 

[Shadowy Man]

Yes, because we all know that we hold everyone to the tweets they made years ago, you know, like we do with Donald Trump.

Yes, because the US President shouldn't be held to the highest level of accountability or anything.

Actually, my point was that we aren't holding Trump to the tweets he's made in the past. He's been all over the political map and nobody cares.