Michele Bachmann said:“That’s the best way to defeat them, by the way — defeat them with evidence and defeat them with their false premises, and I did that,” she said.
Well, Palin didn't have an agenda as much as a shopping list...Why do people in politics complain about people in politics having an "agenda"? Isn't that what politics is about?
Raw Story said:Bachmann told World Net Daily
Isn't there a rule in grammar that states you cannot use Bachmann and Logic in the same sentence?
As Right Wing Watch noted, Bachmann was so noted for her false claims that the chief fact checker for the Associated Press established a “self-imposed Michele Bachmann quota,” and Politifact found the Minnesota Republican had the worst record for accuracy by far of any 2012 presidential candidate.
Isn't there a rule in grammar that states you cannot use Bachmann and Logic in the same sentence?
If you look at China, they don’t have food stamps. If you look at China, they’re in a very different situation. They save for their own retirement security…They don’t have the modern welfare state and China’s growing. And so what I would do is look at the programs that LBJ gave us with the Great Society and they’d be gone.
As Right Wing Watch noted, Bachmann was so noted for her false claims that the chief fact checker for the Associated Press established a “self-imposed Michele Bachmann quota,” and Politifact found the Minnesota Republican had the worst record for accuracy by far of any 2012 presidential candidate.
“I took them on, and their agenda, and I went to the heart of whatever it was they wanted to advance, and tried to take it apart through evidence-based arguments, and they don’t like that,” Bachmann said. “When the left argues, they argue from emotionalism.”

She believes that Communist China is an exemplary capitalist country. Michele Bachmann Is Completely Unaware That China Is Communist | Wonkette
If you look at China, they don’t have food stamps. If you look at China, they’re in a very different situation. They save for their own retirement security…They don’t have the modern welfare state and China’s growing. And so what I would do is look at the programs that LBJ gave us with the Great Society and they’d be gone.
Isn't there a rule in grammar that states you cannot use Bachmann and Logic in the same sentence?