Shadowy Man
Contributor
“Mississippi on line two…”Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.
“Mississippi on line two…”Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.
I honestly don't know. This time during the 2016 election cycle everyone was convinced it was going to be Hilary Clinton against Jeb Bush. 2020 Bernie Sanders was in the clear lead and with regards to 2024 it was looking like a rematch between Biden and Trump. Trump's first impeachment took five months and I'm not confident to guess what's going to happen this time next June.Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.
Sure, but MS and AK don't make 11...“Mississippi on line two…”Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.
You missed my point perhaps. The current Mississippi results show that perhaps senators in Idaho, Arkansas and Alabama shouldn’t be as sure about their reelection chances as perhaps they have always been in the past.Sure, but MS and AK don't make 11...“Mississippi on line two…”Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.
Trump just gave the Republicans the biggest political beatdown in US history. At least some of them have to realize there is no future for the party with Trump hanging around their necks.They need 67 senators for a conviction. There will be between 54 and 56 Democratic Senators from January,The dems didn't have the numbers then. They do now.
Best case, with 56 Democrats, 11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Before this past election you may have been right. Today I wouldn't be so sure.Sure, but do eleven of them need to care? I can't see the Senators from (for example) Idaho, Arkansas, or Alabama being too concerned.List of Republicans up for re-election in 2028:11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Katie Britt
Lisa Murkowski
John Boozman
Ashley Moody
Mike Crapo
Todd Young
Chuck Grassley
Jerry Moran
Rand Paul
John Kennedy
Eric Schmitt
Ted Budd
John Hoeven
James Lankford
Tim Scott
John Thune
Mike Lee
Ron Johnson
If these 18 vote to not impeach, the election ads (in theory) pretty much write themselves.
This is beyond ridiculous fanfiction. A riot that caused the Capitol to be evacuated, how'd these people vote again? Also, Trump won the popular vote after having conspired the Capitol riot.List of Republicans up for re-election in 2028:11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Katie Britt
Lisa Murkowski
John Boozman
Ashley Moody
Mike Crapo
Todd Young
Chuck Grassley
Jerry Moran
Rand Paul
John Kennedy
Eric Schmitt
Ted Budd
John Hoeven
James Lankford
Tim Scott
John Thune
Mike Lee
Ron Johnson
If these 18 vote to not impeach, the election ads (in theory) pretty much write themselves.
Well Damn, if they hadn’t sent so many ‘Pugs home they’d have more of them to try to convert!Best case, with 56 Democrats, 11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Any plan in Congress that requires the GOP to do "the right thing", particularly in following along with the Democrats, is *checks notes* "destined to failure".Well Damn, if they hadn’t sent so many ‘Pugs home they’d have more of them to try to convert!Best case, with 56 Democrats, 11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Seriously … is it such a reach to imagine 11 of the 44 surviving pugs deciding they’re over the fucker who eviscerated their party?
Any plan in Congress that requires the GOP to do "the right thing", particularly in following along with the Democrats, is *checks notes* "destined to failure".
Dude, you are too old to be that naive.Any plan in Congress that requires the GOP to do "the right thing", particularly in following along with the Democrats, is *checks notes* "destined to failure".
Then the definition of failure needs adjustment. In this example, a “failure” rate of 75% when trying to persuade pugs it’s in their interest to kill the albatross that has been plaguing them, would provide an outcome of killing the albatross.
Since, in fact, this WOULD (imho) be in their interest at this juncture, and will become increasingly so over the coming months, I think it’s worth a go. At least once about a million other things Trump broke, are fixed.
Certainly, the nadir of naïveté would be to think “these people” would respond to “left wing radical persuasion”. But that’s not required. The terrain if the territory is changing, and I don’t find the notion that one in four senate pugs might find it propitious to opine that Dear Donald, who did so much to make America Great Again, is inhibiting the very progress for which we thank him from the bottom of our little black hearts.At best we can convince these people
I don't think I can survive another 2 years of Rump.List of Republicans up for re-election in 2028:11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Katie Britt
Lisa Murkowski
John Boozman
Ashley Moody
Mike Crapo
Todd Young
Chuck Grassley
Jerry Moran
Rand Paul
John Kennedy
Eric Schmitt
Ted Budd
John Hoeven
James Lankford
Tim Scott
John Thune
Mike Lee
Ron Johnson
If these 18 vote to not impeach, the election ads (in theory) pretty much write themselves.
As I mentioned before - use the former to achieve the latter. Show all the the people who voted against impeaching Trump in election ads, keep repeating "The Republican party is the Party of Trump - here's the proof", and it should be easiser to pass legislation in 2029.You need to ask yourself, what matters more: a failed impeachment (heck, even a successful impeachment/conviction gives us Vance as President) or a passing / signed legislative agenda in 2029?
I would think the list of those not up for re-election would be the ones easier to convince to impeach.List of Republicans up for re-election in 2028:11 Republican Senators would still have to break ranks.
Katie Britt
Lisa Murkowski
John Boozman
Ashley Moody
Mike Crapo
Todd Young
Chuck Grassley
Jerry Moran
Rand Paul
John Kennedy
Eric Schmitt
Ted Budd
John Hoeven
James Lankford
Tim Scott
John Thune
Mike Lee
Ron Johnson
If these 18 vote to not impeach, the election ads (in theory) pretty much write themselves.
I'm sorry - how so?I would think the list of those not up for re-election would be the ones easier to convince to impeach.