NYC officials against their own peace officers

[Derec]

So a woman sits in the middle of a hallway in a SNAP office, refuses to get out of the way, and when police are called she tries to avoid arrest by using her toddler as a shield as well as kicking and biting HRA (Human Resources Administration) officers who were also there.

But regardless of her crazy-ass behavior, the lefty Brooklyn DA refused to charge her with resisting arrest, HRA suspended their officers (including the bitten one) and the lefty mayor Bill DeBlasio is blaming the HRA officers, while apologizing to the biter.


To paraphrase Underseer, guess her race.

Mother used child as 'shield' to evade arrest, bit a peace officer during incident caught on video, agency documents say

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers.
She had her son next to her in his stroller, and when HRA workers told her she couldn’t sit in the middle of the floor and that she should take a seat, “Client Headley responded back saying she is ‘not f----n’ moving anywhere.”[...]
At some point Headley took the child out of the stroller and “began to use her baby as a shield from getting arrested and was telling the officers ‘You better not touch me,’” according to one of the reports.[...]
“As the NYPD officers were picking her up she began to flare up her arms while resisting,” one of the reports states. “She put the baby between her legs in a tight grip. NYPD officers tried to get the baby off her but she was putting up a fight.”
The HRA peace officer supervisor stated that Headley “kicked me on my right shoulder and (an HRA peace officer) also got bitten on her left arm,” one of the report says.

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman? Why is she being treated as some sort of victim here? Because of her race? Her gender? Her reproductive status?
If a white man had bitten an officer, would the Brooklyn DA have dropped the charges? Would DeBlasio take his side?

 

[untermensche]

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman?

Why were no bankers charged with crimes when they conducted a fraudulent real estate scheme that caused a major collapse of the US economy?

 

[Trausti]

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman?

Why were no bankers charged with crimes when they conducted a fraudulent real estate scheme that caused a major collapse of the US economy?

Why was Ned Stark killed off in the first season of Game of Thrones?

 

[Derec]

Why were no bankers charged with crimes when they conducted a fraudulent real estate scheme that caused a major collapse of the US economy?

(edited)

Besides.

 

[untermensche]

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman?

Why were no bankers charged with crimes when they conducted a fraudulent real estate scheme that caused a major collapse of the US economy?

Why was Ned Stark killed off in the first season of Game of Thrones?

So you compare massive crimes that destroyed the lives of millions with a fairy tale?

 

[Derec]

Why was Ned Stark killed off in the first season of Game of Thrones?

Because Sean Bean. Duh! I'm surprised they let him live in Ronin. And even paid him!

- - - Updated - - -

So you compare massive crimes that destroyed the lives of millions with a fairy tale?

(edited)

 

[untermensche]

Nothing irrelevant about talking about real crimes when some snowflake is crying about minor assault.

 

[Derec]

Nothing irrelevant about talking about real crimes when some snowflake is crying about minor assault.

Biting is not really "minor". And why should she not be prosecuted for assault, when she is clearly guilty of it.
She could have avoided all this by getting up.

And, no, this case has nothing to do with bankers.

 

[hurtinbuckaroo]

Why was Ned Stark killed off in the first season of Game of Thrones?

Because Sean Bean. Duh! I'm surprised they let him live in Ronin. And even paid him!

Yes, that was so effed up: “you’re a fraud, here’s money, go away, and don’t tell anyone about our plans.”

 

[untermensche]

Nothing irrelevant about talking about real crimes when some snowflake is crying about minor assault.

Biting is not really "minor".

Yes it is.

Insane to even think about it.

Unless you have ulterior motives.

 

[Spacetime Inhabitant]

There seems to be a detail people are ignoring:

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers

Waiting four hours (plus with a baby) - that seems something that should be looked at.

 

[Trausti]

There seems to be a detail people are ignoring:

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers

Waiting four hours (plus with a baby) - that seems something that should be looked at.

I think it's the Mayor and the powers-that-be shitting on these officers which is the story.

 

[laughing dog]

This entire incident started because someone (who had been waiting for 4 hours with a toddler) was sitting in the wrong place, refused to move to the right place, so the police were called. And now Derec is placing the race and gender cards.

 

[Toni]

So a woman sits in the middle of a hallway in a SNAP office, refuses to get out of the way, and when police are called she tries to avoid arrest by using her toddler as a shield as well as kicking and biting HRA (Human Resources Administration) officers who were also there.

But regardless of her crazy-ass behavior, the lefty Brooklyn DA refused to charge her with resisting arrest, HRA suspended their officers (including the bitten one) and the lefty mayor Bill DeBlasio is blaming the HRA officers, while apologizing to the biter.


To paraphrase Underseer, guess her race.

Mother used child as 'shield' to evade arrest, bit a peace officer during incident caught on video, agency documents say

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers.
She had her son next to her in his stroller, and when HRA workers told her she couldn’t sit in the middle of the floor and that she should take a seat, “Client Headley responded back saying she is ‘not f----n’ moving anywhere.”[...]
At some point Headley took the child out of the stroller and “began to use her baby as a shield from getting arrested and was telling the officers ‘You better not touch me,’” according to one of the reports.[...]
“As the NYPD officers were picking her up she began to flare up her arms while resisting,” one of the reports states. “She put the baby between her legs in a tight grip. NYPD officers tried to get the baby off her but she was putting up a fight.”
The HRA peace officer supervisor stated that Headley “kicked me on my right shoulder and (an HRA peace officer) also got bitten on her left arm,” one of the report says.

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman? Why is she being treated as some sort of victim here? Because of her race? Her gender? Her reproductive status?
If a white man had bitten an officer, would the Brooklyn DA have dropped the charges? Would DeBlasio take his side?

From your link:

Late Friday, NYPD spokesman Phillip Walzak placed the blame for the entire incident squarely on the HRA peace officers’ shoulders.

After a review of NYPD body cameras, interviews with Headley and her mother, “the preliminary review finds that the incident was escalated by HRA personnel and would likely have been avoided without that escalation,” he said.

Following a terse exchange with an HRA officer, Headley had turned “appearing to head toward an exit when the HRA officer grabs Ms. Headley’s arm, resulting in both being pulled to the ground,” he said.

Maybe you should read the entire article that you linked and not just stop at words: black, woman and baby before laying blame.

 

[Underseer]

So a woman sits in the middle of a hallway in a SNAP office, refuses to get out of the way, and when police are called she tries to avoid arrest by using her toddler as a shield as well as kicking and biting HRA (Human Resources Administration) officers who were also there.

But regardless of her crazy-ass behavior, the lefty Brooklyn DA refused to charge her with resisting arrest, HRA suspended their officers (including the bitten one) and the lefty mayor Bill DeBlasio is blaming the HRA officers, while apologizing to the biter.


To paraphrase Underseer, guess her race.

Mother used child as 'shield' to evade arrest, bit a peace officer during incident caught on video, agency documents say

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers.
She had her son next to her in his stroller, and when HRA workers told her she couldn’t sit in the middle of the floor and that she should take a seat, “Client Headley responded back saying she is ‘not f----n’ moving anywhere.”[...]
At some point Headley took the child out of the stroller and “began to use her baby as a shield from getting arrested and was telling the officers ‘You better not touch me,’” according to one of the reports.[...]
“As the NYPD officers were picking her up she began to flare up her arms while resisting,” one of the reports states. “She put the baby between her legs in a tight grip. NYPD officers tried to get the baby off her but she was putting up a fight.”
The HRA peace officer supervisor stated that Headley “kicked me on my right shoulder and (an HRA peace officer) also got bitten on her left arm,” one of the report says.

Why is the DA refusing to charge the woman? Why is she being treated as some sort of victim here? Because of her race? Her gender? Her reproductive status?
If a white man had bitten an officer, would the Brooklyn DA have dropped the charges? Would DeBlasio take his side?

Wow, so police brutality is actually being prosecuted, and your problem is that the victim isn't the one being prosecuted?

This is mind-boggling.

You fascists are always carrying on about "jack-booted thugs" in the government abusing power, but whenever they actually do abuse power over citizens, you always take their side. Funny how that works.

- - - Updated - - -

There seems to be a detail people are ignoring:

...it began shortly before noon on Dec. 7, when Headley allegedly sat down in the middle of the SNAP office passageway after waiting four hours and demanded to be seen by city welfare workers

Waiting four hours (plus with a baby) - that seems something that should be looked at.

I think it's the Mayor and the powers-that-be shitting on these officers which is the story.

Of course that's the detail you want to focus on. Gosh, I wonder why?

 

[Trausti]

Of course that's the detail you want to focus on. Gosh, I wonder why?

Because I hate virtue signaling assholes who'll sacrifice others so they can appear self-righteous and Woke?

 

[Underseer]

Let's review, shall we?

In Oregon, a bunch of white conservatives were angry because they weren't getting enough free shit from the government, so they had an armed takeover of a government installation in which they tried to start a war with the government (because they weren't getting enough free shit from the government).

During the attempted war with the government (which involved a lot of shooting at the cops), one of the rebels was killed and most of the rest arrested and prosecuted.

Conservatives told us that this was an example of police brutality and threatened to start a civil war if the people involved in the armed attack on police weren't freed.

But this one woman, who is probably mentally unstable, is living with the stresses and strains of poverty, spent 4 hours in a waiting room in a government agency designed to be as dehumanizing as possible, and lost her marbles. The trained professionals who are supposedly trained to deal with such things decided to respond with brutality instead of, like, well, professionals, and conservatives are wondering why the police were prosecuted instead of the woman who was brutalized by the police.

Can you spot the difference between the two very different reactions?

Can you guess why there are two very different reactions?

That's right, because white conservatives are bunch of delicate princess snowflakes and hypocrites who will scream and cry and threaten civil war if they don't get their way, then scream and cry and throw tantrums if poor people are not sufficiently brutalized by the police.

 

[Trausti]

Let's review, shall we?

In Oregon, a bunch of white conservatives were angry because they weren't getting enough free shit from the government, so they had an armed takeover of a government installation in which they tried to start a war with the government (because they weren't getting enough free shit from the government).

During the attempted war with the government (which involved a lot of shooting at the cops), one of the rebels was killed and most of the rest arrested and prosecuted.

Conservatives told us that this was an example of police brutality and threatened to start a civil war if the people involved in the armed attack on police weren't freed.

But this one woman, who is probably mentally unstable, is living with the stresses and strains of poverty, spent 4 hours in a waiting room in a government agency designed to be as dehumanizing as possible, and lost her marbles. The trained professionals who are supposedly trained to deal with such things decided to respond with brutality instead of, like, well, professionals, and conservatives are wondering why the police were prosecuted instead of the woman who was brutalized by the police.

Can you spot the difference between the two very different reactions?

Can you guess why there are two very different reactions?

That's right, because white conservatives are bunch of delicate princess snowflakes and hypocrites who will scream and cry and threaten civil war if they don't get their way, then scream and cry and throw tantrums if poor people are not sufficiently brutalized by the police.

You hate White people. Got it. Think we all figured that out.

 

[Underseer]

Of course that's the detail you want to focus on. Gosh, I wonder why?

Because I hate virtue signaling assholes who'll sacrifice others so they can appear self-righteous and Woke?

*gasp*

So I have hurt your feewings because I complain about racism? Gosh, how terrible of me! Were any of your feewings hurt by my criticisms? Do I need to pay for a new truckload of tissue paper for all the crying you did? I'm so sorry for criticizing you just because you're a white supremacist.

Obviously, I forgot to take into account that white supremacists are special princess snowflakes that must never be criticized!

Can you ever forgive me for publicly criticizing you? I forgot that I'm not allowed to speak on this issue.

 

[Underseer]

So "virtue signaling" means I committed the crime of expressing unapproved opinions about racism.

Under what circumstances am I allowed to express opinions about racism?

I mostly sincerely don't want to offend you again!

Just let me know when I'm allowed to speak and what opinions I'm allowed to express so that I don't hurt your delicate feelings anymore.

I'm so, so very sorry!