• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

On Deck: 2022

SC Senate Candidate Krystle Matthews seems to be a racist:
South Carolina Dems Pressure Senate Nominee to Withdraw over Anti-White Comments

National Review said:
In a video captured by Project Veritas, State Representative Krystle Matthews, who is challenging incumbent Republican Tim Scott in November’s general election, appeared to compare her constituents, who she said are mostly white, to unruly children who need to be restrained and bullied into submission. Her district is “slightly Republican,” she says.
Matthews told the journalist: “I keep them right here — like under my thumbs. … Otherwise, they get out of control — like kids.”
“And let me tell you one thing. You gotta know who you’re dealing with,” she added. “You’ve got to treat them like s—-. That’s the only way they’ll respect you.”

She also encouraged breaking election laws.
In a separate audio clip released in June by Project Veritas, Matthews appeared to tell a South Carolina inmate that illegal activities, such as using money derived from selling drugs, are necessary to support political campaigns. She also seemed to condone “secret sleepers” who steal opponents’ campaign signs in the middle of the night.
“Where the f—- are my black people with money? I don’t care about no dope money, give me that dope boy money. S—, where the f—, where’s the duffle bag boys? Get you, find you somebody in your family that doesn’t even know you’re donating to my campaign, and put that s— under their name. Like, what the f—,” Matthews said during the call.


That race is a hopeless one anyway, but it is still embarrassing for the Democratic Party to nominate somebody like this.
 
John Fetterman's health is a huge questionmark. It's not just about winning the race in November, but also serving in the Senate for at least six years.

This lingering issue isn't going away for John Fetterman

The CNN piece is mostly quoting WaPo, but WaPo articles are behind a very aggressive paywall, so I am going with CNN.

CNN said:
"Since returning to the campaign trail, Mr. Fetterman has been halting in his performances. He stammers, appears confused and keeps his remarks short. He has held no news conferences. Mr. Fetterman acknowledges his difficulties with auditory processing, which make it hard for him to respond quickly to what he's hearing. He receives speech therapy -- and we wish him a speedy, full recovery -- but the lingering, unanswered questions about his health, underscored by his hesitation to debate, are unsettling.
Seems that his stroke has been more serious than he has let on. We will see at the debate that he finally agreed to, although WaPo is probably right that there should be more than one. If his health is impeded, would it then be too late to drop out and endorse Connor Lamb?
 
Raw Story.

The Virginia Libertarian Party has dissolved itself, discouraged by increasingly bigoted right wing politics oozing into the Libertarian Party.
Libertarian Party of Virginia dissolving after national party’s ‘bigoted’ turn, ex-chair says - Virginia Mercury
If the main purpose of a political party is to run candidates for office, former Libertarian Party of Virginia Chairwoman Holly Ward says it felt like a “violation” to keep taking people’s money. ...

The resolution to dissolve the state party, which Ward says was approved Sunday in a 7-6-1 vote by the party’s central committee, said the national party has become “functionally indistinct from other alt-right parties and movements.”

Those “destructive” ideas, the resolution said, include “endorsing thinly-veiled antisemitism, explicitly welcoming bigotry into the party, reversing the LP’s 50-year legacy of support for LGBTQ+ rights, and openly denouncing women’s suffrage, the civil rights act, and democracy itself.”

Ward attributed those trends to a Libertarian faction called the Mises Caucus, which she said is taking over the party apparatus and discouraging Libertarian candidates from running in swing states where they could hurt Republican votes and tilt the outcome toward Democrats.

Ward pointed to several social media posts as examples of the types of messages she opposed, including posts from the national party saying “Social justice is a Marxist lie created to bully and divide the American people,” defining democracy as “mob rule that endangers individual rights” and replying to the AP Stylebook suggesting the pronoun “she” could no longer be used “since we don’t know what a woman is anymore.” She also pointed to a deleted Martin Luther King Jr. Day Twitter post by the Libertarian Party of New Hampshire, an account the national party amplifies, that said “America isn’t in debt to black people, if anything it’s the other way around.” Another post from the New Hampshire account said “6 million dollar minimum wage or you’re antisemitic,” which many interpreted as a reference to the six million Jews killed in the Holocaust.

“Obviously I don’t support any of these messages,” Ward said. “It’s bigoted. It’s absolutely repugnant.”
Just like the old joke that a Libertarian is a Republican who smokes pot.
 
Opinion | The Wives of Republican Candidates Are Getting Personal - The New York Times
On some deep, even subconscious, level we are expected to absorb the message: If the candidate’s wife — and the mother of his children — thinks he’s a good guy, then it must be so.

Spare me. The notion that there is some meaningful insight about a candidate to be had from his spouse praising him in ads or defending him in interviews or simply appearing at his campaign events is weak at best. Gov. Ron DeSantis’s wife, Casey, may genuinely believe he’s the cat’s pajamas; that doesn’t change the guy’s disturbing authoritarian Trumpiness. Just because Heidi Cruz sticks with him does not make Senator Ted Cruz any less of a smirking, self-righteous, sedulously opportunistic jerk. Melania Trump’s willingness to put up with Donald’s vileness tells us far more about her than him. And the less said about Hillary and Bill Clinton’s tortured codependence, the better.

Let us set aside for the moment the enduring, and enduringly tiresome, political impulse to reduce even the most accomplished women to cheerleaders for their husbands’ domestic gifts. In the current political moment, this gimmick is not only trite but also distracting — and insulting to female voters.

Mr. Masters may well be the World’s Greatest Dad. That does not change the fact that until recently he was proudly declaring his extreme anti-abortion positions, including support for a federal personhood law. (Post-primary, of course, his website has been scrubbed of this info, and he is fast moderating his rhetoric to meet the moment.)

Mr. Vance may take out the trash without fail and read bedtime stories with exceptional panache. Or not. Either way, he has likened abortion to slavery and has pooh-poohed the need for exceptions in cases of rape or incest. (“Two wrongs don’t make a right,” he has glibly declared.)
and
Of course, some Republican political wives aren’t as interested in softening their boos’ positions as in giving them a feminine spin. At a rally last month in Pittsburgh, Rebecca Mastriano, whose husband, Doug, is running hard to the right in his quest to become Pennsylvania’s governor, had much to say about the G.O.P. and women’s rights. She started with abortion — “First, we believe in protecting the woman’s right to be born” — before wending her way through issues including a woman’s right to control her child’s education, to live in a safe community and to own a gun.
 
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Wednesday said that GOP Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.) and Paul Gosar (Ariz.) will have their committee seats restored next year if Republicans win back the House despite their participation in a white nationalist conference last month.

McCarthy said that he has spoken with Greene in recent days but has yet to talk with Gosar after the two spoke at the America First Political Action Conference organized by white nationalist Nick Fuentes.

“She will not go again,” McCarthy said of Greene.

“There’s no place for what has gone on with that organization by far, and there never will be in this party, and it will never be tolerated,” McCarthy said at a press conference in the Capitol.

McCarthy pledged last fall to reinstate Greene and Gosar on House committees after Democrats — and a handful of Republicans — voted last year to take away their seats for promoting the idea of political violence.

And on Wednesday, he affirmed that hasn’t changed.

“They have the ability to be able to get committees based upon that time when it comes,” McCarthy said.
Yeah, right, Kev. :rolleyes:
 
House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) on Wednesday said that GOP Reps. Marjorie Taylor Greene (Ga.) and Paul Gosar (Ariz.) will have their committee seats restored next year if Republicans win back the House despite their participation in a white nationalist conference last month.

McCarthy said that he has spoken with Greene in recent days but has yet to talk with Gosar after the two spoke at the America First Political Action Conference organized by white nationalist Nick Fuentes.

“She will not go again,” McCarthy said of Greene.

“There’s no place for what has gone on with that organization by far, and there never will be in this party, and it will never be tolerated,” McCarthy said at a press conference in the Capitol.

McCarthy pledged last fall to reinstate Greene and Gosar on House committees after Democrats — and a handful of Republicans — voted last year to take away their seats for promoting the idea of political violence.

And on Wednesday, he affirmed that hasn’t changed.

“They have the ability to be able to get committees based upon that time when it comes,” McCarthy said.
Yeah, right, Kev. :rolleyes:
Sure, and Trump learned his lesson, Sinema...

The fact that she went, ever, as an adult over the age of 25 is too many, and too much.
 
(...)
Yeah, right, Kev. :rolleyes:
Sure, and Trump learned his lesson, Sinema...
That was Susan Collins.
My bad. ._.
 
The Campaign to Troll Dr. Oz for Living in New Jersey - The New York Times - "John Fetterman’s race for Senate in Pennsylvania has employed an unusual campaign strategy."
For much of the summer, Fetterman’s campaign sustained a viral media narrative that depicted Oz not just as a wealthy, out-of-touch celebrity with a tenuous connection to Pennsylvania, but as something that is, both regionally and nationwide, way more loathed: a guy from New Jersey.
Mehmet Oz was born in Ohio, raised in Delaware, and then lived in New Jersey for some decades.
Later in 2020, Oz formally adopted a Pennsylvania address — but early this summer, when he released a campaign video, the home he was speaking from looked a lot like the one he’d invited a magazine to photograph. Fetterman tweeted a tip: “Don’t film an ad for your Pennsylvania Senate campaign from your mansion in New Jersey.”
The article mentioned some more of JF's trolling of MO as a New Jersey carpetbagger.
Charges that a candidate is “not really from here” typically carry an undertow of class or ideology or, in darker moments, ethnicity. Fetterman’s, of course, is not remotely the xenophobic attack you might imagine a Muslim candidate like Oz facing. (Though an Armenian lobbying group has targeted Oz’s Turkish background and dual citizenship.) Neither is it primarily ideological. And while there is an implied class element — the celebrity doctor, looking down on Manhattan from an estate atop a literal cliff — this has not been the most palpable aspect of the snipe. Fetterman’s insults are laced with a specific regional animus that’s hard to imagine working the same way anywhere else.
 
Bolduc Wins New Hampshire Senate Primary, Realizing G.O.P. Fears - The New York Times
The race was called midday Wednesday, as Mr. Bolduc held a lead of more than 1,500 votes over Chuck Morse, the president of the State Senate.

Mr. Morse was endorsed by Gov. Chris Sununu and helped by $4.5 million from national Republicans, who were worried that a victory by Mr. Bolduc would forfeit what they saw as a winnable seat in the quest for Senate control this fall.

Mr. Bolduc’s victory will come as a relief to Democrats, who also assume he will be the weaker opponent against Senator Maggie Hassan, a first-term Democrat. She won in 2016 by about 1,000 votes in purple New Hampshire but has been saddled with low job approval numbers. Four states — New Hampshire, Arizona, Georgia and Nevada — have vulnerable Democratic senators the party is aggressively defending to keep its hold on the Senate.
 
60 Percent Of Americans Will Have An Election Denier On The Ballot This Fall | FiveThirtyEight

Out of 552 Republican nominees running for office, 201 denied the legitimacy of the 2020 election, 61 raised questions about the legitimacy of that election, 105 had no comment, 17 avoided answering, 91 accepted those election results with reservations, and 77 fully accepted those election results.

That means that only 30% of those candidates accept the legitimacy of that election.

For the House, 118 election deniers and 8 election doubters have at least a 95% chance of winning, according to 538's modeling. There are several more in competitive races.

In the Senate, 3 election deniers are likely to join the 7 that are not up for re-election, and there also, some more are in competitive races.

Turning to state governors, at least 2 election deniers and 4 election doubters are likely to get elected, with some more possible in swing states like Arizona and Pennsylvania.

Some 7 election deniers are running for state attorney general and an additional 7 for secretary of state, the position that usually handles elections.

Indeed, an election denier winning election and taking office is more than a symbolic concern. An election-denying secretary of state could refuse to certify an election that he or she believes was rigged. An election-denying governor could attempt to submit electoral votes that defy the will of the people. And election-denying senators and representatives could vote to count those electoral votes. The 2022 election will determine how many of these candidates get that chance.
 
Election deniers are winning primaries: Why it matters for 2024 - The Washington Post
In many states, the secretary of state is the chief elections official. It’s a crucial job, but not one that many Americans have heard of, much less paid attention to.

But secretary of state races are starting to get a lot more national attention and money. Former president Donald Trump and his allies have succeeded in boosting 2020 election deniers as candidates this primary season, and in many states, they’ve won the Republican nomination. That means, by next year, election deniers could be in charge of their states’ elections, including in key swing states for the 2024 presidential race.
Though a secretary of state can't directly change an election's votes, a SOS can cause other sorts of trouble.
1. Make it harder to vote
2. Allow for endless audits of results
3. Refuse to sign off on election results
4. Sow distrust in results

Then some candidates to watch:

MI: Kristina Karamo -- "She is one of the loudest provocateurs spreading false election fraud claims. ... She would probably push to make it harder to vote. Karamo has talked about severely restricting or ending mail voting."

AZ: Mark Finchem -- "After the 2020 election, Finchem argued for throwing out the results of Arizona’s most populous county — despite the fact that a Republican-led audit ultimately found more votes for Joe Biden. ... As a state lawmaker, Finchem introduced a bill that would let the state legislature overturn election results. Before his primary this summer, he unsuccessfully sued to try to get Arizona to count ballots by hand."

NV: Jim Marchant -- "He ran for Congress in 2020, lost and sued to try to overturn his result. He was unsuccessful, but did catch the attention of Trump. ... At the top of his list is giving state lawmakers more say in determining election results, which would hand all or part of the decision about who wins to partisan politicians. He also wants to get rid of mailed ballots and voting machines, and count results by hand ..."

PA: the gov appoints the SOS -- "I get to appoint the secretary of state … I could decertify every machine in the state with the stroke of a pen."

FL: the gov appoints the SOS -- "In his first term, DeSantis signed into law a controversial election police force designed to investigate election fraud. The current secretary of state is Cord Byrd, a former right-wing state legislator who has refused to say Biden won in 2020 and will lead Florida’s election police force."

WI: "... the secretary of state is not the top election official. That job belongs to a bipartisan commission. But GOP nominee Amy Loudenbeck, alongside top Wisconsin Republicans, wants to hand that power to the secretary of state."

Other Republican secretaries of state on the ballot in November have pushed back forcefully against election-denying claims. Perhaps the best known is Brad Raffensperger in Georgia, who in 2020 refused Trump’s demand to “find” enough votes to flip the state to him. He easily won his primary this spring against a Trump-backed challenger.

But in 2022, denying the results of the 2020 election has been the price of admission in many Republican primaries across the country. And election experts say nowhere is that more dangerous for democracy than these secretary of state positions.
 
2020 election deniers are winning secretary of state races : NPR - lists both winners and losers, like Rep. Jody Hice, who quit to run for GA SOS, but lost the Republican primary.

Trump's 2024 triumph - with a map of "States with at least one statewide GOP candidate who is a 2020 election denier" - a sizable fraction. Among them are some swing states, like PA and MI and WI and AZ.
Most of the hardcore denialists are likely to lose in November, Kraushaar reports. A big exception is Kari Lake for Arizona governor.

These nominees' underdog status underscores the fact that GOP voters have gone MAGA — but fringe views don't sell outside the party's primaries.


Pennsylvania's Republican Senate primary
The former president has a long history of insisting elections are fraudulent when he's expecting he won't get the outcome he wants. But historically, election officials around the country from both parties have complied with the law to count up and certify the vote regardless of their politics.
Then about how some election deniers could get into state offices.
"We have to be a lot sharper next time when it comes to counting the vote," Trump said in a video message earlier this year. "There's a famous statement: Sometimes the vote counter is more important than the candidate. And we can't let that ever, ever happen again," Trump said, referring to a quote from Soviet Union dictator Joseph Stalin.
 
Trump's 2024 triumph - with a map of "States with at least one statewide GOP candidate who is a 2020 election denier" - a sizable fraction
As I mentioned elsewhere, a person who genuinely believes that Trump won in both 2016 and 2020, must accept that this implies his ineligibility to run in 2024, under the conditions imposed by the 22nd Amendment.
 
Trump's 2024 triumph - with a map of "States with at least one statewide GOP candidate who is a 2020 election denier" - a sizable fraction
As I mentioned elsewhere, a person who genuinely believes that Trump won in both 2016 and 2020, must accept that this implies his ineligibility to run in 2024, under the conditions imposed by the 22nd Amendment.
Thanks. Because what you expose there's a lot of MAGA hat shards out there revealing a lot of MAGA rednecks. What we're calling a no brainer storm from the vast Qanon.
 
As I mentioned elsewhere, a person who genuinely believes that Trump won in both 2016 and 2020, must accept that this implies his ineligibility to run in 2024, under the conditions imposed by the 22nd Amendment.
Unfortunately, no. Q-tards have fabricated a work around since last year.

The idea stems from the belief among some QAnon followers that the United States turned from a country into a corporation after the passage of the District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871.
It's an odd, unfounded theory drawn from the sovereign citizen movement, an extreme libertarian fringe that opposes federal laws, general taxation and even the US currency on the grounds that they restrict individual rights.
Believers in the QAnon offshoot maintain that every US president, act and amendment passed after 1871 is illegitimate.

And yes Bilby, that means Trump's 2016 Presidency was technically illegitimate but you see it was legit because of...um...


WHY AREN'T YOU TALKING ABOUT HUNTER'S LAPTOP!!!!!!!!111111111

 
Newly Uncovered Emails Show Blake Masters’ Long History of Hating Democracy – Mother Jones
He's now running for US Senate in Arizona.
On Election Day in 2005, then–Stanford sophomore Blake Masters sent two emails to the listserv of his vegetarian co-op. In the first, Masters, now the Republican Senate candidate in Arizona, urged classmates to read an article about a California ballot measure “(i)f you must worship that miserably peculiar American diety [sic] called Democracy.” In the second, he put together a reading list that could have easily served as a crash course in anti-democratic libertarianism.

Two of the articles were by Hans-Hermann Hoppe, a German economist best known for his 2001 jeremiad Democracy: The God That Failed. One, a 1995 paper titled “The Political Economy of Monarchy and Democracy, and the Idea of a Natural Order,” argued that “the historic transition from monarchy to democracy represents not progress but civilizational decline.” In addition to advocating “the abdication of democracy,” Hoppe wanted people to accept a “natural order” under which a “voluntarily acknowledged ‘natural’ elite—a nobilitas naturalis” reigns supreme.
A natural nobility???
It showed how Masters and his former boss, the billionaire investor Peter Thiel, transitioned from libertarians who hoped to escape politics to authoritarian sympathizers who seek to protect their liberty by gaining control of the state.

... Majority Leader Mitch McConnell and National Republican Senatorial Committee leader Rick Scott have done little to hide their frustration after being saddled with an underperforming first-time candidate who has a penchant for needless provocation.

Hans-Hermann Hoppe was an influence on Curtis Yarvin, "Mencius Moldbug", a supporter of absolute monarchy. HHH: “because of selective mating and marriage and the laws of civil and genetic inheritance, positions of natural authority are more likely than not passed on within a few—noble—families.”

So it's genetics? I think that with genomics so well-developed, we may soon be able to test for anything unusual in the genetics of members of noble and royal families.
In Democracy: The God That Failed, Hoppe was more explicit about those further down the social ladder, referring to them as “human trash which drives individual property values down.” In 2016, Thiel was set to speak at a conference in Turkey hosted by Hoppe’s Property and Freedom Society—a group whose past guests had included white nationalists like Richard Spencer and Jared Taylor—only to pull out after the news sparked a backlash.

Along with the Hoppe articles, Masters linked to an interview with Murray Rothbard, a Hoppe mentor whose idea of liberty allowed for defenses of Strom Thurmond, Joe McCarthy, and former Ku Klux Klan leader David Duke. He also shared pieces from Paul Gottfried, who has been called the “Alt-Right’s Jewish Godfather,” and Thomas DiLorenzo, a strident critic of Abraham Lincoln who has managed to get panned by both the Southern Poverty Law Center and the hard-right Claremont Review of Books.
It's revealing what statists a self-styled libertarian likes.
 
In February 2006, Masters sent an email to the listserv plugging a post on his Stanford blog that argued that roads should be privatized. The next day, he shared another that claimed the United States entered World War I to “to save banking interests and to fulfil [sic] Wilsons [sic] personal fantasy dream of a world government.” He quickly made the same argument in an article for the anti-state website LewRockwell.com. Channeling Rothbard, he wrote that the United States, hadn’t “been involved in a just war in over 140 years.” (After Jewish Insider found the article, Masters said that he had gone “too far” in making that claim.)
Meaning that the US Civil War was the last war that the US was legitimately involved in. He later claimed that he went "too far" because he was exposed as implying that US involvement in World War II was illegitimate.
More than a decade later, the student of propaganda had left the classroom. He launched his campaign by calling for an America where families could get by on one income, only to provide no coherent plan for making that happen. He claimed Trump won the election, but added qualifiers to suggest to his more reality-based followers that he didn’t believe voting machines had actually been rigged. He called abortion “demonic” and a “genocide” then revamped his website’s abortion section after making it out of the primary.

Today, Masters is trailing Kelly in the polls, McConnell’s super-PAC is pulling ad spending, and Thiel is saying funding Masters’ campaign isn’t his responsibility. Theory is proving harder than practice.
 
Blake Masters Is Peter Thiel’s Dream Candidate—and a Total Nightmare for Democracy – Mother Jones
In the spring of 2012, Blake Masters, who was in his final year at Stanford Law, sat in on a computer science class taught by Peter Thiel, the billionaire co-founder of PayPal. During a lecture titled “Founder as Victim, Founder as God,” Thiel argued a kinglike leader was essential to innovation. “A startup is basically structured as a monarchy,” he explained. “We don’t call it that, of course. That would seem weirdly outdated, and anything that’s not democracy makes people uncomfortable.”

Afterward, Masters tweeted that the lecture was the best 90 minutes he’d ever spent in a classroom and linked to the exhaustive notes he’d been taking on Thiel’s course.

"Earlier in his career, Thiel wrote about creating floating colonies in the ocean, while Masters told people not to vote."

Floating cities are a common libertarian pipedream. They have talked about floating cities a lot, but they never seem to have come anywhere close to building one. The closest that any libertarian has come was in founding the  Republic of Minerva on some reefs in the Pacific Ocean. In 1971, the republic's founders dumped some sand on the reefs, bringing them above sea level. But early in 1972, the nearby nation of Tonga claimed the republic's territory, and later that year backed up that claim by sending an expedition to that republic and conquering it. And that was that for the Republic of Minerva.
 
"A decade after his startup lectures, there should no longer be any doubt that Thiel’s sympathy for authoritarianism extends well beyond the private sector."

Which explains why Peter Thiel is supporting several Republican candidates, JD Vance in Ohio and Blake Masters in Arizona.
They include Curtis Yarvin, who describes himself as America’s foremost absolute monarchist blogger; Murray Rothbard, the reactionary economist who suggested libertarians use right-wing populism to push their agenda; and Ted Kaczynski, the Unabomber, whom Masters has praised (with caveats). Another favorite is Lee Kuan Yew, the late dictator of Singapore who oversaw a miraculous economic transformation while crushing the civil liberties of those who stood in the way.

But no one is as influential as Thiel, who confessed in a 2009 essay, “I no longer believe that freedom and democracy are compatible.” He went on to warn that the “fate of our world may depend on the effort of a single person who builds or propagates the machinery of freedom that makes the world safe for capitalism.”

Thiel is setting himself up to be that builder. Masters is one of his tools.
Lee Kuan Yew was a sort of latter-day Cato the Elder, someone very hard-assed but uncorrupt.
Many of the more than a dozen friends and acquaintances of Masters I’ve spoken with, including the best man at his wedding, have been shocked to see the transformation of someone who used to consider himself an open-borders libertarian turn into an America First nationalist whom Tucker Carlson calls “the future of the Republican Party.”
Open-boarders libertarian? Open borders involve less government than closed borders, so that's actually consistent with libertarians' claimed beliefs.
In the one article he wrote for the Stanford Daily, Masters argued that voting is usually immoral because it leads to others being forced to pay taxes: “People who support what we euphemistically call ‘democracy’ or ‘representative government’ support stealing certain kinds of goods and redistributing them as they see fit.” He urged his fellow students not to participate in the 2006 midterms.
One could even say that about some libertarians' ideal of a night-watchman state, that it involves distributing resources from self-protectors to those who are too lazy to protect themselves. So one ends up with anarchism.

"The numerous messages shared with Mother Jones reveal a man largely unsympathetic to those who would lose out if his version of libertarianism prevailed." -- something very common among right-libertarians, in my experience.

"When will someone start a group that’s pro-gun (pro-freedom) AND pro-choice (pro-freedom)?" -- he objected to restrictions on both guns and abortions back then.
 
Back
Top Bottom