Why can't Wal-Mart shoppers be trusted not to steal?
Why can't Wal-Mart shoppers be trusted not to steal?
Why would you think that?Doesn't Wal-Mart pay taxes that provides these public services? I would think that the taxes paid more than compensate for the use of law enforcement services, no?
They have no obligation to do anything. Apparently whatever they are doing, it is not enough to stop their problem of shoplifting.And if you don't believe so, isn't that on the onus of the one making the claim to demonstrate it? Why do they have an additional obligation for private security?
Clearly those loss prevention teams are not as successful as Wal-Mart would like.Also, Wal-Mart does have a loss prevention team that works at every store.
Clearly those loss prevention teams are not as successful as Wal-Mart would like.
Hold on, I thought corporations don't pay taxes? I know I've heard people on the Right say that about a million times.Doesn't Wal-Mart pay taxes that provides these public services? I would think that the taxes paid more than compensate for the use of law enforcement services, no? And if you don't believe so, isn't that on the onus of the one making the claim to demonstrate it? Why do they have an additional obligation for private security? Also, Wal-Mart does have a loss prevention team that works at every store.
Wal-Mart is just another welfare queen relying on taxpayers to pick up their tab.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
Not if Wal-Mart is still concerned about its losses due to shoplifting.Clearly those loss prevention teams are not as successful as Wal-Mart would like.
FWIW, the loss prevention team's job is to catch shoplifters. So in that regard, there doing alright here.
Wal-Mart is just another welfare queen relying on taxpayers to pick up their tab.
Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk
If only there were other places people opposed to Wal-Mart's low prices model could shop.
Doesn't Wal-Mart pay taxes that provides these public services? I would think that the taxes paid more than compensate for the use of law enforcement services, no?
Why would you think that?
Right... it is THEIR PROBLEM. Not the cops or the communities... Wal-Marts.And if you don't believe so, isn't that on the onus of the one making the claim to demonstrate it? Why do they have an additional obligation for private security?laughing dog said:They have no obligation to do anything. Apparently whatever they are doing, it is not enough to stop their problem of shoplifting.
No, they are not as successful as the COPS WOULD LIKE... because the cops, you know, have to do their jobs and shit.Also, Wal-Mart does have a loss prevention team that works at every store.laughing dog said:Clearly those loss prevention teams are not as successful as Wal-Mart would like.
MallWart - A place to buy cheap plastic junk A bumper sticker that gave me quite the laugh as I didn't even see MallWart spelled wrong the first time I read it, but realized it later in my red light boredom. I need another reason not to shop at MallWart? Probably not...
If the police are 'overwhelmed' by shoplifters, then maybe they need to prioritize better? Maybe let that shoplifter just sit in the security office for a few more hours while they respond to more important stuff, if need be.
If the police are 'overwhelmed' by shoplifters, then maybe they need to prioritize better? Maybe let that shoplifter just sit in the security office for a few more hours while they respond to more important stuff, if need be.
Or maybe they need to actually punish shoplifters when they catch them.
What more, specifically, do those criticizing Wal-Mart want it to do about shoplifting?
What more, specifically, do those criticizing Wal-Mart want it to do about shoplifting?
Did you read the article in the OP?