• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Pete Buttigieg

Elixir said:
Still mystified at Derec's idiotic complaint about people who make and uphold laws knowing something about laws...
I guess that's standard moronics for the garden-variety "I'm not a Trumpsucker", their orange avatar being the pure embodiment of legal ignorance and all...
Click to expand...

Why conservatives love dumb presidents
 
Elixir said:
Still mystified at Derec's idiotic complaint about people who make and uphold laws knowing something about laws...
I guess that's standard moronics for the garden-variety "I'm not a Trumpsucker", their orange avatar being the pure embodiment of legal ignorance and all...
Click to expand...

What's idiotic is you saying that somebody should have to be a lawyer in order to be able to make and uphold laws.
 
Elixir said:
Still mystified at Derec's idiotic complaint about people who make and uphold laws knowing something about laws...
I guess that's standard moronics for the garden-variety "I'm not a Trumpsucker", their orange avatar being the pure embodiment of legal ignorance and all...
Click to expand...

Struck a nerve, obviously. Neg repped for that, with only "logic fail" commented.
Way to uphold the uniform ignorance of Republican candidates! :hysterical:
 
Angry Floof said:
Why conservatives love dumb presidents
Click to expand...

While it is spot on, that article still pussy-foots around the root issue. While it points out that Republicans allege that "he is smart enough to beat 16 other Republicans" it only obliquely addresses the corollary fact; it means that the Republican electorate is stupid enough to choose him over 16 relatively qualified candidates.
 
Elixir said:
Angry Floof said:
Why conservatives love dumb presidents
Click to expand...

While it is spot on, that article still pussy-foots around the root issue. While it points out that Republicans allege that "he is smart enough to beat 16 other Republicans" it only obliquely addresses the corollary fact; it means that the Republican electorate is stupid enough to choose him over 16 relatively qualified candidates.
Click to expand...

It's because stupid, insecure people feel smarter and more secure with a fellow stupid, insecure leader.
 
Angry Floof said:
Elixir said:
Angry Floof said:
Why conservatives love dumb presidents
Click to expand...

While it is spot on, that article still pussy-foots around the root issue. While it points out that Republicans allege that "he is smart enough to beat 16 other Republicans" it only obliquely addresses the corollary fact; it means that the Republican electorate is stupid enough to choose him over 16 relatively qualified candidates.
Click to expand...

It's because stupid, insecure people feel smarter and more secure with a fellow stupid, insecure leader.
Click to expand...

Lol! I get the "people feel smarter" part, but ... more secure with teh stoopid?
I see images of a Sam Elliott meme. :D
 
Elixir said:
Angry Floof said:
Why conservatives love dumb presidents
Click to expand...

While it is spot on, that article still pussy-foots around the root issue. While it points out that Republicans allege that "he is smart enough to beat 16 other Republicans" it only obliquely addresses the corollary fact; it means that the Republican electorate is stupid enough to choose him over 16 relatively qualified candidates.
Click to expand...

So they were stupid to pick really the only one of be bunch who could beat the anointed Hillary? Yeah, stupid.
 
Angry Floof said:
Elixir said:
Angry Floof said:
Why conservatives love dumb presidents
Click to expand...

While it is spot on, that article still pussy-foots around the root issue. While it points out that Republicans allege that "he is smart enough to beat 16 other Republicans" it only obliquely addresses the corollary fact; it means that the Republican electorate is stupid enough to choose him over 16 relatively qualified candidates.
Click to expand...

It's because stupid, insecure people feel smarter and more secure with a fellow stupid, insecure leader.
Click to expand...

Project much?
 
Trausti said:
So they were stupid to pick really the only one of be bunch who could beat the anointed Hillary? Yeah, stupid.
Click to expand...
It's always amazing how much mind reading and crystal ball forecasting conservatives insist they are capable of.

Even if we suppose that Trump WAS the only Rep capable of defeating Clinton; Can you show me that it isn't because he was the only candidate dumber than the typical Republican base voter and therefore the only one that could really excite the sizable "deplorables" faction of the Republican base?
 
zorq said:
It's always amazing how much mind reading and crystal ball forecasting conservatives insist they are capable of.
Click to expand...

Yeah, especially regarding past events. They don't forecast, they project their wishes upon the past. Given the lying, cheating and foreign interference invited by the Trump campaign, any one of those 16 "non-reality TV star" Republicans could have "beaten" Hillary. But Trump was the only one corrupt enough for Pootey.
 
Pete Buttigieg wants Thomas Jefferson items renamed
“Yeah, we’re doing that in Indiana. I think it’s the right thing to do,” ...

“There’s a lot, of course, to admire in his thinking and his philosophy,” ...

“But then again, if you plunge into his writings, especially the ‘Notes on the State of Virginia,’ you know that he knew slavery was wrong. And yet he did it,” he explained.
Click to expand...
Not surprisingly, the right-wingers are having a cow about that.
 
lpetrich said:
Pete Buttigieg wants Thomas Jefferson items renamed
“Yeah, we’re doing that in Indiana. I think it’s the right thing to do,” ...

“There’s a lot, of course, to admire in his thinking and his philosophy,” ...

“But then again, if you plunge into his writings, especially the ‘Notes on the State of Virginia,’ you know that he knew slavery was wrong. And yet he did it,” he explained.
Click to expand...
Not surprisingly, the right-wingers are having a cow about that.
Click to expand...

This is a case of be careful what you wish for...you just might get it. Pres Obama (among many others) was openly and publicly against gay marraige for quite some time. Should we now, or in the future, rename roads, buildings, schools, etc that currently have his name on them?
 
thebeave said:
Should we now, or in the future, rename roads, buildings, schools, etc that currently have his [Obama's] name on them?
Click to expand...

Fine with me, as long as every trace of the aberration named Trump can be expunged from the record immediately upon his removal from office... especially the personnel he has appointed.
 
Elixir said:
Angry Floof said:
It's because stupid, insecure people feel smarter and more secure with a fellow stupid, insecure leader.
Click to expand...

Lol! I get the "people feel smarter" part, but ... more secure with teh stoopid?
I see images of a Sam Elliott meme. :D
Click to expand...

Well, edumacated people can't be trusted, you know?
 
Mayor Pete just rocked the townhall event in New Hampshire, broadcast on Fox News (Chris Wallace hosting). This guy is so good.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom