• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Planned Parenthood Attacked: Three Dead

About one of the victims

An Iraq War veteran who was killed in the Planned Parenthood shooting ran back inside the building after being shot to warn others to take cover, his brother told NBC News.

Image: Ke'Arre Stewart
Ke'Arre Stewart. Tony Fisher
Ke'Arre Stewart — a 29-year-old father-of-two — was hit after stepping outside the Colorado Springs clinic because he did not have any cellphone service, according to brother Leyonte Chandler.

Chandler said it was his sibling's Army experience that prompted his final act of heroism.

"I believe that's his military instinct, you know: Leave no soldier behind, leave no civilian behind, just leave no one behind," an emotional Chandler said. "So he ran back inside, trying to help out others. I don't know where he was at, as far as how many more breaths he had, but he knew. And before his time ran out I guess that was his main priority ... to help and save other lives."

KeArre-Stewart-via-NBC-News-screencap-800x430.png
 
About one of the victims

An Iraq War veteran who was killed in the Planned Parenthood shooting ran back inside the building after being shot to warn others to take cover, his brother told NBC News.

Image: Ke'Arre Stewart
Ke'Arre Stewart. Tony Fisher
Ke'Arre Stewart — a 29-year-old father-of-two — was hit after stepping outside the Colorado Springs clinic because he did not have any cellphone service, according to brother Leyonte Chandler.

Chandler said it was his sibling's Army experience that prompted his final act of heroism.

"I believe that's his military instinct, you know: Leave no soldier behind, leave no civilian behind, just leave no one behind," an emotional Chandler said. "So he ran back inside, trying to help out others. I don't know where he was at, as far as how many more breaths he had, but he knew. And before his time ran out I guess that was his main priority ... to help and save other lives."
Another black living off of the blood and sweat of the American worker.
 
I heard that guy once smoked marajuana as a teenager. I'm not trying to say that this means that he was a thug who provoked the shooting and got what was coming to him, but he was definitely a thug who provoked the shooting and got what was coming to him.
 
I heard that guy once smoked marajuana as a teenager. I'm not trying to say that this means that he was a thug who provoked the shooting and got what was coming to him, but he was definitely a thug who provoked the shooting and got what was coming to him.
This is very true. He busted into the building yelling and ranting about how someone is coming to "get them". Only reasonable conclusion was that he was crazy and better to shoot him first than wait to find out if he had a gun on him.
 
About one of the victims

An Iraq War veteran who was killed in the Planned Parenthood shooting ran back inside the building after being shot to warn others to take cover, his brother told NBC News.

Image: Ke'Arre Stewart
Ke'Arre Stewart. Tony Fisher
Ke'Arre Stewart — a 29-year-old father-of-two — was hit after stepping outside the Colorado Springs clinic because he did not have any cellphone service, according to brother Leyonte Chandler.

Chandler said it was his sibling's Army experience that prompted his final act of heroism.

"I believe that's his military instinct, you know: Leave no soldier behind, leave no civilian behind, just leave no one behind," an emotional Chandler said. "So he ran back inside, trying to help out others. I don't know where he was at, as far as how many more breaths he had, but he knew. And before his time ran out I guess that was his main priority ... to help and save other lives."

View attachment 4891
thug
 
It does make me wonder why he survived though. We have a black guy being shot on the suspicion that he is armed, and the assumption that he is violent. Then you have a pile of cops facing down a guy who most certainly IS armed, dangerous, and violent who shot a fucking cop and then walks away...

exactly
 
Since the root of gun control is to keep "those people" from having guns, your statement makes no sense. A study of history would tell you why your party tells you why you support gun control. Your party has been the part of gun control ever since the emancipation proclamation, and that is why your party tells you that you are in favor of gun control.

The root of gun control is to prevent all these senseless killings.

Yes, which is why I support the Libertarian Party's policy on sensible gun control.

The roots of gun nuttery is cowardice.

Like the Brady Campaign and the Democratic Party, both nutty when the topic of firearms comes up.

It is the plan to hold all of society hostage to the cowardly fears of the most paranoid and deluded.

Yes, like the Brady Campaign and the Democratic Party, both paranoid and deluded when the topic of firearms comes up. They want to make sure "those people" don't have access to guns, and have been that way ever since the emancipation proclamation.
 
Only by dictionary definition - but not by reality.

Example: Prostitution is illegal in many SE Asian countries - however, go there and you will find it is rife.

And a prostitute in a southeast asian country is still a prostitute, by definition and by reality.

And a terrorist who is not Arab or Persian and is not a Muslim is also still a terrorist, by definition.
 
No I am not. Tell if I got this wrong.

You say that this white man is being persecuted for being a terrorist with he is really psychotic and this persecution in based in an anti white racism. You are saying that by definition a lone gunman can not be a terrorist.

The FBI and actual law say otherwise.

And common sense says it too.
I wouldn't go that far. People of moderate views with reasonable elasticity of thought to understand that there are degrees of difference tend to not be extreme in the scope of word usage, and instead of broadening the scope beyond reasonable limits, they look to other terms to encompass the extreme ends; however, people angered by the wrongs of others tend (in the usage of terms) broaden the scope beyond what might otherwise be reasonable. The prevailing result tends to side with those extreme in thought and the evolution of meaning more often favors those most emotionally charged by the wrongs of others. The consequences are outlandish stipulative meanings that goes beyond what people might otherwise have regarded as common sense. An example would be a legal definition of kidnapping. Another example would be a legal definition of terrorism.

When blocking someone from exiting a building for two seconds is kidnapping, and when threatening to beat someone up is terrorism, it might very well fit the newly broadened scope of what terms have been redefined to mean, but to say it's common sense is a bit much.
 
You do know that muslim and white are not mutually exclusive nor are they in kind characteristics, right?

Or do you consider muslims to be a race, or perhaps whiteness a religion?

Most muslims are non-white, other than a small group of race traitors in places such as Bosnia

- - - Updated - - -

C'mon man, sucking one dick doesn't make you gay.

That's true, and KeithandCo think that 10 can do it at the same time - that would be impossible, hence we can conclude that this poster is not very serious
 
And a prostitute in a southeast asian country is still a prostitute, by definition and by reality.

And a terrorist who is not Arab or Persian and is not a Muslim is also still a terrorist, by definition.

A person like this, operating on their own cannot really be a terr, other than by rigid dictionary definition - you know, like some people call Hitler a 'socialist' (see now we have gay sex AND Godwin's law);)
 
You do know that muslim and white are not mutually exclusive nor are they in kind characteristics, right?

Or do you consider muslims to be a race, or perhaps whiteness a religion?

Most muslims are non-white, other than a small group of race traitors in places such as Bosnia

Oh dear, your stormfront slip is showing.
 
C'mon man, sucking one dick doesn't make you gay.

That's true, and KeithandCo think that 10 can do it at the same time - that would be impossible,
I don't recall that claim, but, yes, I do believe you can play a game of telephone sucking dicks. It wouldn't be terribly comfortable positions, especially if number 10 has to come back around to number 1, and the sex won't be especially meaningful, but it's not impossible.
You lie on the floor with your head pillowed on the next guy's thigh, his balls against your nose... The next guy laying at about a 45 degree angle from you. And a further 45 from you, someone has his head on your thigh....

If they don't circle around, you can put them all in a line, say down the starboard side of Missile Compartment Upper Level, just alternate. Odd numbered dicksuckers on their back, with their stalagmite in the next guy's face, even numbered on hands and knees, their stalactite in the next guy's face. The guys on either end get either no attention or nothing but attention, so they need to be pivot-men in the next attempt.

Be careful with words like 'impossible.' Sometimes it only takes four Ken dolls and a few minutes to disprove a theory, leading the entire crew to ask, "Why do you have four gay fashion dolls on a submarine?'
 
but this guy shooting up the abortio clinic was a nutjob, not a terrorist - dictionary definitions are too rigid here

I mean, would you say the whackjob school shooters are terrs, no,they are just whackjobs, similar but different.
They most certainly can be. Timothy McVeigh was white and he was a terrorist (but not a gun man).

He had a strong political motive, but this other guy was just railing against a social issue

Sounds to me like the PP shooter had a strong political motive. I still say terrorist.

Attacking one PP clinic, by itself, cannot stop PP from performing abortions or providing tissue for research. Scaring patients away from all the clinics through a horrendous act of terrorism can.
 
And a prostitute in a southeast asian country is still a prostitute, by definition and by reality.

And a terrorist who is not Arab or Persian and is not a Muslim is also still a terrorist, by definition.

A person like this, operating on their own cannot really be a terr, other than by rigid dictionary definition - you know, like some people call Hitler a 'socialist' (see now we have gay sex AND Godwin's law);)

I disagree. You can have a lone terrorist. The essence of terrorism is scaring the people into doing what you want. It's hard for a lone person to accomplish much without getting caught but that doesn't mean it's not terrorism.
 
And a prostitute in a southeast asian country is still a prostitute, by definition and by reality.

And a terrorist who is not Arab or Persian and is not a Muslim is also still a terrorist, by definition.

A person like this, operating on their own cannot really be a terr, other than by rigid dictionary definition
Is there any particular reason not to use the rigid dictionary definition?

you know, like some people call Hitler a 'socialist'
Which, by "rigid dictionary definition,' he wasn't. Strictly speaking, Hitler was a fascist with a penchant for socialist economic policies.
 
Back
Top Bottom