• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Police Misconduct Catch All Thread

Katie Porter Advocates For Mental Health Response Units To Allow Police Officers To Focus On Crime - YouTube - "During House Floor remarks on Thursday, Rep. Katie Porter (D-CA) spoke about The Mental Health Justice Act."

She noted that over 1/5 of 911 calls are for mental-health problems and that we should not criminalize mental illness. She claimed that 1/4 of cops' encounters with mentally ill people lead to the cop killing that person. Her bill gives funds to local communities to create squads of trained mental-health professionals to respond to people with mental-health crises. She says that cops can then focus on violent crime and other such things, and she claims that some cops support her in that.

I like her framing, because it seems very pro-cop instead of anti-cop like "defund the police". I've thought of a slogan that I think is MUCH better: "alternatives to policing."

The bill itself: H.R.8542 - 117th Congress (2021-2022): Mental Health Justice Act of 2022 | Congress.gov | Library of Congress
This bill creates a grant program for states, tribal entities, and local governments to train and dispatch mental health professionals to respond, instead of law enforcement officers, to emergencies that involve people with behavioral health needs.

The Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA) must manage the program in consultation with the Department of Justice (DOJ). SAMHSA may cancel grants that increase incarceration or institutionalization.

The Department of Health and Human Services and DOJ must evaluate this program.

Roll Call 452 | Bill Number: H. R. 8542
The vote:
D: Y 220
R: Y 3, N 206, nv 3
Tot: Y 223, N 206 nv 3

Among the three Republicans to vote for it was Michelle Steel, R-CA, someone whom KP cited as co-leading on the bill, along with Ayanna Pressley, Tony Cardenas, and Mary Gay Scanlon, all Democrats.

It didn't go anywhere in the Senate, however.
 
A San Antonio police officer who shot and wounded a teenager Sunday in a McDonald's parking lot has been fired after newly released body-cam footage appeared to contradict the cop's initial report, MySA reports.

SAPD rookie James Brennand initially said he fired his weapon after the teen struck him with his vehicle, according to police reports obtained by MySA. However, in body-cam footage posted by the department, it appears the teen — who's recovering in hospital — never struck the officer.
As seen in the footage, the rookie officer approaches the car and opens the driver's side door, where he finds a teenager eating a burger. Brennand orders the youth out of the vehicle. The teenager puts his hands on the steering wheel and responds to the officer's request by asking, "Why?"

The vehicle of the teen driver, whose identity hasn't been made public, rolls backward while the officer shoots five times. It's unclear from the clip whether the driver shifted the car into reverse or rolled backward because his foot left the brake pedal.

Brennand then radios "shots fired" before shooting at the car another five times.

In the clip, it doesn't appear that the vehicle ever struck Brennand.

 
A San Antonio police officer who shot and wounded a teenager Sunday in a McDonald's parking lot has been fired after newly released body-cam footage appeared to contradict the cop's initial report, MySA reports.

SAPD rookie James Brennand initially said he fired his weapon after the teen struck him with his vehicle, according to police reports obtained by MySA. However, in body-cam footage posted by the department, it appears the teen — who's recovering in hospital — never struck the officer.
As seen in the footage, the rookie officer approaches the car and opens the driver's side door, where he finds a teenager eating a burger. Brennand orders the youth out of the vehicle. The teenager puts his hands on the steering wheel and responds to the officer's request by asking, "Why?"

The vehicle of the teen driver, whose identity hasn't been made public, rolls backward while the officer shoots five times. It's unclear from the clip whether the driver shifted the car into reverse or rolled backward because his foot left the brake pedal.

Brennand then radios "shots fired" before shooting at the car another five times.

In the clip, it doesn't appear that the vehicle ever struck Brennand.


This is way beyond stupid, it is criminally reckless.

The officer had no reasonable suspicion that the car he saw in the parking lot was the same car that he had previously tried to stop for an alleged tag violation.
The officer had no idea who was driving the car, or how many passengers were in the car. He had no reason to believe they had committed any crimes, or were dangerous.
The officer did not initiate a traffic stop with his vehicle, he simply opened the door and ordered the driver to step out. We have no idea whether the driver even recognized that he was a cop - he might have thought he was being car-jacked. That might explain why the driver tried to get away, to protect himself and his passenger.
The officer was never in any danger of being run over by the car.

The cop fired 5 rounds as the car pulled out, and another 5 rounds after the car had turned and was pulling away from him. This is a busy urban area with multiple roads and businesses in the direct line of his fire. The driver was hit twice. It is a wonder nobody other than the driver was hit.

The cop has been fired, and the Chief of Police has made a public announcement stating that the officer's actions were not consistent with department policy and training. There is apparently a criminal investigation underway and the DA may file charges against the officer. And the city will no doubt be paying millions in the lawsuit that is bound to follow.

And to think that just the other day Derec was telling us how dangerous the dead black man in the other police shooting was because he had been accused of "mishandling a firearm". But there is no outrage about this cop doing the same.
 
A San Antonio police officer who shot and wounded a teenager Sunday in a McDonald's parking lot has been fired after newly released body-cam footage appeared to contradict the cop's initial report, MySA reports.

SAPD rookie James Brennand initially said he fired his weapon after the teen struck him with his vehicle, according to police reports obtained by MySA. However, in body-cam footage posted by the department, it appears the teen — who's recovering in hospital — never struck the officer.
As seen in the footage, the rookie officer approaches the car and opens the driver's side door, where he finds a teenager eating a burger. Brennand orders the youth out of the vehicle. The teenager puts his hands on the steering wheel and responds to the officer's request by asking, "Why?"

The vehicle of the teen driver, whose identity hasn't been made public, rolls backward while the officer shoots five times. It's unclear from the clip whether the driver shifted the car into reverse or rolled backward because his foot left the brake pedal.

Brennand then radios "shots fired" before shooting at the car another five times.

In the clip, it doesn't appear that the vehicle ever struck Brennand.


This is way beyond stupid, it is criminally reckless.

The officer had no reasonable suspicion that the car he saw in the parking lot was the same car that he had previously tried to stop for an alleged tag violation.
The officer had no idea who was driving the car, or how many passengers were in the car. He had no reason to believe they had committed any crimes, or were dangerous.
The officer did not initiate a traffic stop with his vehicle, he simply opened the door and ordered the driver to step out. We have no idea whether the driver even recognized that he was a cop - he might have thought he was being car-jacked. That might explain why the driver tried to get away, to protect himself and his passenger.
The officer was never in any danger of being run over by the car.

The cop fired 5 rounds as the car pulled out, and another 5 rounds after the car had turned and was pulling away from him. This is a busy urban area with multiple roads and businesses in the direct line of his fire. The driver was hit twice. It is a wonder nobody other than the driver was hit.

Based on reading this, I assumed some time had passed between opening the door and then firing the gun, like something happened. Then I caught the video. OMFG!

Clearly the officer isn't firing in response to the car backing up. I don't think there was enough time for him to even process the car was beginning to move. There are literally only five seconds between opening the door and instructing person to get out... and then trying to kill the person in the car by firing his gun. Probably 3 or 4 seconds before he goes for his gun.

It went from bravado cop to panicked cop.
The cop has been fired, and the Chief of Police has made a public announcement stating that the officer's actions were not consistent with department policy and training.
Not consistent? I think that was a misprint in the announcement and they meant to say the officer's training was non-existent.
 
Police in Houston packed a council meeting with armed and uniformed police officers in a show of intimidation against witness opposed to police brutality and to threaten the council members who were set to deliberate the upcoming budget for the local police forces.

Fucking thug tactics.


police intimidation.png

Code:
https://twitter.com/equalityalec/status/1579871103773655040


If you are in uniform you are working... I don't see these thugs working.


It worked by the way. They got their budget increase.
 
Illegal search and seizure. Lawsuit incoming. This is an old video.

Some cops are stupid and don't know the law. Others break the law because they have an inflated ego and believe their badge will protect them from consequences. Which it often does, other than in the most extreme cases. Qualified immunity has to go.
 

A Massachusetts police officer attended the deadly “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, five years ago and acted in key security and planning roles, HuffPost has confirmed. He also used an alias to post racist and antisemitic comments online. The officer, John Donnelly, was still an active-duty member of the police force until Thursday, shortly after HuffPost inquired about his status with the department and role in the deadly white supremacist rally.

Well that's reassuring. Apparently he was Richard Spencer's personal bodyguard.
 

A Massachusetts police officer attended the deadly “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, five years ago and acted in key security and planning roles, HuffPost has confirmed. He also used an alias to post racist and antisemitic comments online. The officer, John Donnelly, was still an active-duty member of the police force until Thursday, shortly after HuffPost inquired about his status with the department and role in the deadly white supremacist rally.

Well that's reassuring. Apparently he was Richard Spencer's personal bodyguard.
Are we gonna just gloss over the fact that "uniting the right" is apparently code for "uniting in racism"?
 

A Massachusetts police officer attended the deadly “Unite the Right” rally in Charlottesville, Virginia, five years ago and acted in key security and planning roles, HuffPost has confirmed. He also used an alias to post racist and antisemitic comments online. The officer, John Donnelly, was still an active-duty member of the police force until Thursday, shortly after HuffPost inquired about his status with the department and role in the deadly white supremacist rally.

Well that's reassuring. Apparently he was Richard Spencer's personal bodyguard.
Are we gonna just gloss over the fact that "uniting the right" is apparently code for "uniting in racism"?
What code? They're just not saying the whole thing!

It's Unite the Right with Racism!
 
Not a cop but a POS.



That boy is a grown man but yeah, its not a good look based on the background info presented. Hard to find any official statements/records of what actually happened other than an article saying the 62 year old man thought the 24 year old ones friend stole a bike the other day. If that's the case then yeah, you shouldn't be detaining the person who didn't steel the bike. Ask questions sure but detain? Nope.

 
Not a cop but a POS.



That boy is a grown man but yeah, its not a good look based on the background info presented. Hard to find any official statements/records of what actually happened other than an article saying the 62 year old man thought the 24 year old ones friend stole a bike the other day. If that's the case then yeah, you shouldn't be detaining the person who didn't steel the bike. Ask questions sure but detain? Nope.


He's special needs. My younger brother is too. He's in his late fifties but his intellect is at about the age of 14. He can take care of himself to a point but he still has home health care to assist him.
 
Not a cop but a POS.



That boy is a grown man but yeah, its not a good look based on the background info presented. Hard to find any official statements/records of what actually happened other than an article saying the 62 year old man thought the 24 year old ones friend stole a bike the other day. If that's the case then yeah, you shouldn't be detaining the person who didn't steel the bike. Ask questions sure but detain? Nope.


He's special needs. My younger brother is too. He's in his late fifties but his intellect is at about the age of 14. He can take care of himself to a point but he still has home health care to assist him.


I noticed that. I doubt that his special needs was the reason the old man detained him though. In fact his special needs were likely overlooked by the old man who prioritized something else.
 
Kenneth Vinyard, 48, was killed after he and his fiance witnessed a shooting in a Pennsylvania Walmart parking lot over the weekend.

The exact circumstances of the shooting itself are unclear, aside from that Vinyard and his fiance initially weren't involved and did not know the victim. Nevertheless, Vinyard had quickly begun to administer first aid to the man who had been shot, when a second unidentified man approached, who ordered Vinyard to "step back", and then shoved Vinyard so hard that he fell and struck his head on the concrete, sustaining trauma serious enough that his fiance had to begin chest compressions as he had no pulse.

At the scene, after fatally injuring Vinyard, the man identified himself to Vinyard's fiance as a plainclothes Center Township police officer. Vinyard was later pronounced dead at the hospital. The state police are investigating but aren't releasing any details about the incident. An attorney for Vinyard's family is demanding the officer involved be criminally charged.
 
Back
Top Bottom