Polls of the Presidential Race

[Jason Harvestdancer]

Reminds me of the old joke that Libertarians are Republicans who smoke pot.

I never understood that. It is just as true that they are Democrats who hate taxes.

Perhaps you could elaborate on the similarities and differences between L and R, and between L and D, and see if your statement makes any sense or if it just a tired old trope. I think even you know it is a tired old trope.

There also isn't a credible accusation of sexual inappropriate behavior against Biden.

If you define "credible" as "accusing a Republican", then so.

 

[Harry Bosch]

Reminds me of the old joke that Libertarians are Republicans who smoke pot.

I never understood that. It is just as true that they are Democrats who hate taxes.

Perhaps you could elaborate on the similarities and differences between L and R, and between L and D, and see if your statement makes any sense or if it just a tired old trope. I think even you know it is a tired old trope.

There also isn't a credible accusation of sexual inappropriate behavior against Biden.

If you define "credible" as "accusing a Republican", then so.

No. I don't define a credit accusation as simply one where someone is making a "accusation". For an accusation to be credible, it needs to have some evidence behind it, a witness, or maybe at least a source with a good reputation. If the accuser has no evidence and has a history of ripping people off, lying in court, and has an agenda - then it's not credible.

 

[Jason Harvestdancer]

No. I don't define a credit accusation as simply one where someone is making a "accusation". For an accusation to be credible, it needs to have some evidence behind it, a witness, or maybe at least a source with a good reputation. If the accuser has no evidence and has a history of ripping people off, lying in court, and has an agenda - then it's not credible.

So then, by that standard, you agree that both candidates have credible accusations against them. I don't see why you're making such a fuss.

 

[angelo]

The polls are not looking good for the Trump atm. And no wonder, with most of the media dedicating whole journals and TV programs to a Trump hate fest. Perhaps if more people paid attention to what's been achieved in just three years of the Trump administration as compared to several of the last administrations. Especially Obuma's!

Title. What Has Trump Actually done........................................https://www.facebook.com/sheri.hendrick.9/posts/1517427838438600

What's next from you angelo? Some youtube comments perhaps?

Can you refute any of those achievements from the Trump? Oh, and by the way, many Democrats aren't exactly enthralled by Groper Joe.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020...atross&utm_source=paid&utm_campaign=elections

 

[Patooka]

The polls are not looking good for the Trump atm. And no wonder, with most of the media dedicating whole journals and TV programs to a Trump hate fest. Perhaps if more people paid attention to what's been achieved in just three years of the Trump administration as compared to several of the last administrations. Especially Obuma's!

Title. What Has Trump Actually done........................................https://www.facebook.com/sheri.hendrick.9/posts/1517427838438600

What's next from you angelo? Some youtube comments perhaps?

Can you refute any of those achievements from the Trump? Oh, and by the way, many Democrats aren't exactly enthralled by Groper Joe.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020...atross&utm_source=paid&utm_campaign=elections

You never finished high school did you? If you handed in that crap you posted as an essay you would at best get a zero with the comment "show your working". But because you appear astonishingly ignorant I'll give you a couple of hints - correlation is not causation and you know jack fucking shit about the American legislative process.

But I've gotta admit, you are always adorable accusing everyone else in living in a bubble whilst spamming links from the most biased websites around the internet.

 

[angelo]

Can you refute any of those achievements from the Trump? Oh, and by the way, many Democrats aren't exactly enthralled by Groper Joe.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020...atross&utm_source=paid&utm_campaign=elections

You never finished high school did you? If you handed in that crap you posted as an essay you would at best get a zero with the comment "show your working". But because you appear astonishingly ignorant I'll give you a couple of hints - correlation is not causation and you know jack fucking shit about the American legislative process.

But I've gotta admit, you are always adorable accusing everyone else in living in a bubble whilst spamming links from the most biased websites around the internet.

As someone else has already stated: " We'll see what happens." And almost 5 months is a hell of a long time in politics. For the record, I think the odds of the Trump overcoming all the obstacles and winning a second term are most probably around 30-40 to one. But as an ex punter. I once backed a horse at 100 to one, and it won by about 2 lengths.

 

[Patooka]

Can you refute any of those achievements from the Trump? Oh, and by the way, many Democrats aren't exactly enthralled by Groper Joe.

https://www.nationalreview.com/2020...atross&utm_source=paid&utm_campaign=elections

You never finished high school did you? If you handed in that crap you posted as an essay you would at best get a zero with the comment "show your working". But because you appear astonishingly ignorant I'll give you a couple of hints - correlation is not causation and you know jack fucking shit about the American legislative process.

But I've gotta admit, you are always adorable accusing everyone else in living in a bubble whilst spamming links from the most biased websites around the internet.

As someone else has already stated: " We'll see what happens." And almost 5 months is a hell of a long time in politics. For the record, I think the odds of the Trump overcoming all the obstacles and winning a second term are most probably around 30-40 to one. But as an ex punter. I once backed a horse at 100 to one, and it won by about 2 lengths.

What the fuck does that have to do with you posting unsubstantiated bullshit?

angelo: *posts random facebook clickbait*
Patooka: This is bullshit
angelo: Can you disprove it?
Patook: There's nothing to prove or disprove! None of the statements have sources backing them up. There isn't even a date to any of these so called "accomplishments" let alone any proof. This is the social media equivalent of believing Gazza sucks dicks because it was written on the toilet door at the Crown Inn.
angelo: We shall see

My, what a coherent argument you provide. Apparently Trump's achievements are purely speculative whilst at the same time being absolutely true in angeloWorld. I wonder if the laws of physics apply in your deluded fantasy because the laws of logic sure as fuck don't.

 

[angelo]

As someone else has already stated: " We'll see what happens." And almost 5 months is a hell of a long time in politics. For the record, I think the odds of the Trump overcoming all the obstacles and winning a second term are most probably around 30-40 to one. But as an ex punter. I once backed a horse at 100 to one, and it won by about 2 lengths.

What the fuck does that have to do with you posting unsubstantiated bullshit?

angelo: *posts random facebook clickbait*
Patooka: This is bullshit
angelo: Can you disprove it?
Patook: There's nothing to prove or disprove! None of the statements have sources backing them up. There isn't even a date to any of these so called "accomplishments" let alone any proof. This is the social media equivalent of believing Gazza sucks dicks because it was written on the toilet door at the Crown Inn.
angelo: We shall see

My, what a coherent argument you provide. Apparently Trump's achievements are purely speculative whilst at the same time being absolutely true in angeloWorld. I wonder if the laws of physics apply in your deluded fantasy because the laws of logic sure as fuck don't.

FM!!! I asked you if you can refute any of the Trump's achievements while POTUS in less than four years! Are you trying to divert because you cannot refute one single Trump achievement in that long list in the link I posted?

 

[Patooka]

As someone else has already stated: " We'll see what happens." And almost 5 months is a hell of a long time in politics. For the record, I think the odds of the Trump overcoming all the obstacles and winning a second term are most probably around 30-40 to one. But as an ex punter. I once backed a horse at 100 to one, and it won by about 2 lengths.

What the fuck does that have to do with you posting unsubstantiated bullshit?

angelo: *posts random facebook clickbait*
Patooka: This is bullshit
angelo: Can you disprove it?
Patook: There's nothing to prove or disprove! None of the statements have sources backing them up. There isn't even a date to any of these so called "accomplishments" let alone any proof. This is the social media equivalent of believing Gazza sucks dicks because it was written on the toilet door at the Crown Inn.
angelo: We shall see

My, what a coherent argument you provide. Apparently Trump's achievements are purely speculative whilst at the same time being absolutely true in angeloWorld. I wonder if the laws of physics apply in your deluded fantasy because the laws of logic sure as fuck don't.

FM!!! I asked you if you can refute any of the Trump's achievements while POTUS in less than four years! Are you trying to divert because you cannot refute one single Trump achievement in that long list in the link I posted?

I guess we'll see.

 

[Patooka]

If you think a random Facebook post is considered a reputable source of information, and if you think the burden of proof lies with me to prove or disprove these farcical claims, you must be gullible as shit. I'm sorry, but there isn't a lot I can do to help you. Horse to water and all that.

 

[funinspace]

As someone else has already stated: " We'll see what happens." And almost 5 months is a hell of a long time in politics. For the record, I think the odds of the Trump overcoming all the obstacles and winning a second term are most probably around 30-40 to one. But as an ex punter. I once backed a horse at 100 to one, and it won by about 2 lengths.

What the fuck does that have to do with you posting unsubstantiated bullshit?

angelo: *posts random facebook clickbait*
Patooka: This is bullshit
angelo: Can you disprove it?
Patook: There's nothing to prove or disprove! None of the statements have sources backing them up. There isn't even a date to any of these so called "accomplishments" let alone any proof. This is the social media equivalent of believing Gazza sucks dicks because it was written on the toilet door at the Crown Inn.
angelo: We shall see

My, what a coherent argument you provide. Apparently Trump's achievements are purely speculative whilst at the same time being absolutely true in angeloWorld. I wonder if the laws of physics apply in your deluded fantasy because the laws of logic sure as fuck don't.

FM!!! I asked you if you can refute any of the Trump's achievements while POTUS in less than four years! Are you trying to divert because you cannot refute one single Trump achievement in that long list in the link I posted?

I counted about 124 in that silly Facebutt list. Now some are real, but many are bad (aka. 'moving embassy to Jerusalem'); some are obtuse as it was the Repugs in the Senate not Clownstick ( aka. 'Has his circuit court judge nominees being confirmed faster than any other new administration'); some are just plain not associated with Clownstick's actions, but simply he was president when it happened (It's called the result of years of fracking: 'The U.S. is a net natural gas exporter for the first time since 1957.')

Go ahead and refute Pres. Obama's achievements from this list of 244:
https://ramonahouston.com/blog/the-244-accomplishments-of-president-barak-obama/

 

[blastula]

Or refute these.

100 Reasons Trump Is Unfit to Be President - The Bulwark

 

[angelo]

If you think a random Facebook post is considered a reputable source of information, and if you think the burden of proof lies with me to prove or disprove these farcical claims, you must be gullible as shit. I'm sorry, but there isn't a lot I can do to help you. Horse to water and all that.

That's what I've done. Brought the camel to water. Not my fault it won't drink!

Here's Groper Joe at his best. Notice even the little boy on the left seems disgusted. [ image won't post on tablet]
I'll post it later on my desktop.

 

[angelo]

FM!!! I asked you if you can refute any of the Trump's achievements while POTUS in less than four years! Are you trying to divert because you cannot refute one single Trump achievement in that long list in the link I posted?

I counted about 124 in that silly Facebutt list. Now some are real, but many are bad (aka. 'moving embassy to Jerusalem'); some are obtuse as it was the Repugs in the Senate not Clownstick ( aka. 'Has his circuit court judge nominees being confirmed faster than any other new administration'); some are just plain not associated with Clownstick's actions, but simply he was president when it happened (It's called the result of years of fracking: 'The U.S. is a net natural gas exporter for the first time since 1957.')

Go ahead and refute Pres. Obama's achievements from this list of 244:
https://ramonahouston.com/blog/the-244-accomplishments-of-president-barak-obama/

Moving embassy to Jerusalem is among his top achievements. All past presidential candidates promised to do so, but all except Trump got cold feet at the last minute. Embassies are usually situated in capital cities, and Jerusalem is Israel's capital and centre of government.

 

[angelo]

Deleted

 

[Cheerful Charlie]

In looking at polls at 270towin, I noticed something that struck me. For example, Florida. Biden is at 48%. Trump at 41%. But Other is at 11%. This is typical. At any state, anywhere from 8% to 12% are "other". I have seen a number of polls that tell us some people out there do not like either Biden or Trump and are not going to vote. If say 5% of Florida's Other are that, of the remaining 6%, 4% are going to vote Green or Libertarian. and the rest, 2% are going to make up their mind late in the election season. Even if they went mostly for trump, it wouldn't be enough to matter. It is hard to say what this all means, though again, I have seen reports a sizable number of people don't like either candidate. It might be possible in states where one or the other candidate is so far ahead a vote for either makes no difference that some people will vote Third Party to register their discontent with both parties. Whether any of this makes a difference in the race at this point, I cannot really say for sure. But my back of the envelope calculation would seem to say it won't matter much as in many swing states, Biden leads by 8% to 10%. For example, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, states that gave Trump the electoral college in 2016.

https://www.270towin.com/2020-polls-biden-trump/

This may give some Big False Hopes to the Trump camp.

 

[Patooka]

If you think a random Facebook post is considered a reputable source of information, and if you think the burden of proof lies with me to prove or disprove these farcical claims, you must be gullible as shit. I'm sorry, but there isn't a lot I can do to help you. Horse to water and all that.

That's what I've done. Brought the camel to water. Not my fault it won't drink!

Here's Groper Joe at his best. Notice even the little boy on the left seems disgusted. [ image won't post on tablet]
I'll post it later on my desktop.

You're absolutely right. I concede to your superior arguing skills.

 

[angelo]

In looking at polls at 270towin, I noticed something that struck me. For example, Florida. Biden is at 48%. Trump at 41%. But Other is at 11%. This is typical. At any state, anywhere from 8% to 12% are "other". I have seen a number of polls that tell us some people out there do not like either Biden or Trump and are not going to vote. If say 5% of Florida's Other are that, of the remaining 6%, 4% are going to vote Green or Libertarian. and the rest, 2% are going to make up their mind late in the election season. Even if they went mostly for trump, it wouldn't be enough to matter. It is hard to say what this all means, though again, I have seen reports a sizable number of people don't like either candidate. It might be possible in states where one or the other candidate is so far ahead a vote for either makes no difference that some people will vote Third Party to register their discontent with both parties. Whether any of this makes a difference in the race at this point, I cannot really say for sure. But my back of the envelope calculation would seem to say it won't matter much as in many swing states, Biden leads by 8% to 10%. For example, Michigan, Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, states that gave Trump the electoral college in 2016.

https://www.270towin.com/2020-polls-biden-trump/

This may give some Big False Hopes to the Trump camp.

Don't forget that once upon a time, at roughly the same time frame before the presidential election, in another race for the WH, a certain Dukasis was 19 points in front of G W Bush who went on to win the November election by 8 points.

 

[angelo]

Have a look at the boy on left's look of disgust. This is Groper Joe in what he does best...........molest females, the younger the better!

https://www.facebook.com/ed.montalvo.12/posts/355030968840802

 

[funinspace]

Have a look at the boy on left's look of disgust. This is Groper Joe in what he does best...........molest females, the younger the better!

https://www.facebook.com/ed.montalvo.12/posts/355030968840802

You mean the Daughter-Fucking Putin-Sucking Trump?