• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Predict Trump's first revenge prosecutions!

We like this brand of semi-literate, profane hooliganism in our leaders. Trump is us. The Repubs won't have to break any laws to keep their winning edge.
No "we" don't.

To replay a now common saying, the people who voted for him don't understand what they've voted for. When things like the ACA get eliminated and either them or someone they love dies because of it, maybe they'll realize it, maybe they won't. When they lose their own due process rights, maybe they'll get it, maybe they won't. When protesters are gunned down in the streets, maybe they'll be horrified, maybe they won't.

And when their internet porn is eliminated? Oh, they'll get that.

Abortion? They'll care about that when it affects them for sure.

But it'll be too late by then.

Remember that the law is what the Supreme Court says it is (Marbury v. Madison).

Trump and this administration can do whatever they want; and that's exactly what they're going to do.

Americans that voted for him are going to find out that they didn't want what they voted for.
 
Trump improved his % last month on basically all the demographics. His voters enlarged his base substantially.
based on the numbers I looked at it seemed that his increase in percentage of the vote was more to do with a substantially smaller number of votes for Harris than Biden rather than a large increase in votes for Trump.

But I could be wrong.

He still got less than 50% of the vote.
 
Trump improved his % last month on basically all the demographics. His voters enlarged his base substantially.
based on the numbers I looked at it seemed that his increase in percentage of the vote was more to do with a substantially smaller number of votes for Harris than Biden rather than a large increase in votes for Trump.

But I could be wrong.

He still got less than 50% of the vote.
He got 77 million plus. Four million more than last time. Go figure. Lies really fly.
 
Trump improved his % last month on basically all the demographics. His voters enlarged his base substantially.
based on the numbers I looked at it seemed that his increase in percentage of the vote was more to do with a substantially smaller number of votes for Harris than Biden rather than a large increase in votes for Trump.

But I could be wrong.

He still got less than 50% of the vote.
He got 77 million plus. Four million more than last time. Go figure. Lies really fly.
According to Wikipedia Trump got 77.3M votes in 2024, whereas he got 74.2M in 2020, so an increase of just over 4%.

Biden got 81.3M votes in 2020 but Harris only got 75M in 2024, a decrease of almost 8%.
 

Americans that voted for him are going to find out that they didn't want what they voted for.
I sure as hell hope you're right. I am someone who never, ever understood how anyone voted for Trump. Saw him for the first time on a talk show in 2011 and couldn't believe the level of blatant, brazen lying he was capable of. And, until last month, I rested on the comfortable assumption that his base was around 33% and he could only prevail with a lot of independent voters. I don't think so, anymore. I think the level of Trump Acceptance has crept up in the past 8 years. The Rise of the Stupid.
Here is Trump, telling a story on the campaign trail this past fall:
"You're a parent and your son leaves the house and you say, 'Jimmy, I love you so much. Go have a good day in school. And your son comes back with a brutal operation." (Trump means gender reassignment surgery.) "Can you even imagine this?"
Here's another version, the one Trump told the Moms for Liberty:
"This transgender thing is incredible. Think of it: Your kid goes to school and comes back a few days later with an operation. The school decides what's going to happen with your child. And you know, many of these childs (sic), fifteen years later, say, 'What the hell happened? Who did this to me?'"
Now, there are just a few conclusions you can arrive at, concerning anyone who would tell such a preposterous story:
A, If he believes it, he is divorced from reality and has real cognitive issues. Someone who believed the story would be mentally unstable and in no way should he be trusted with running a country, making military decisions and proposing policy.
B, If he knows it's a lie, he is cynical to the core and contemptuous of the intelligence level of his audience. He has no integrity whatever and cannot be trusted to do anything for the good of the country.
I'm not sure there's a third conclusion.
Then consider the conclusions to be reached about anyone who would vote for this politician.
A, They don't know that he said something so crazy, because they stick to right wing 'news' sites that wouldn't bring up Trump's bizarre fantasies. (Uninformed/apathetic voter.)
B, They know Trump said it, and they believe it. (Divorced from reality/Gaslit beyond redemption)
C, They know he said it, think it is just one of his exaggerations, and are willing to overlook it if he can do something about the price of bacon. (Cynical + gullible.) (And this type of voter may be aware that this very week, Trump rescinded his promise that he could do anything about high prices.)
D, They know he said it, but Kamala would be so much worse. (Probably a common conclusion, but then you'd need to tell me how Kamala was delusional or contemptuous of the truth, and you'd have to tell me how unstable a President you'd be willing to elect, just to avoid a Democrat administration.)
I really don't think any successful politician could have told this Jimmy Got Emasculated at School story even 20 years ago and have prevailed with his party's nomination or at the polls. We're in a new, fogbound age dominated by a cult mentality, and I don't see any hopeful signs at this point. Trump leaving the scene in whatever fashion won't necessarily change a thing. There's a long line of hopeful replacements ready to take up the crazy banner.
Once again, I hope you're right that Trump II will be so draconian and destructive that he will destroy his brand. But the guy already led hundreds of thousands of the faithful to their coffins with his stupidity during the pandemic, and left the economy in a smoking gully at the end of 2020. I'd like to think that he won't be able to talk his way out of future disasters. We'll see...
 
Last edited:
WTF! I just read that the House has passed HR 9495, which gives Sec'y Treasury unilateral power to revoke the tax-exempt status of any entity he deems "terrorist." This change in status will effectively destroy many non-profits, including ACLU, NAACP, and news sources like ProPublica.
I guess those non-profits really should have avoided becoming terrorist organizations then.

Presumably, if the government believes they are terrorists they will also get charged and put in prison, yes?

That would require actual evidence. IIUC, HR 9495 allows revocation of status with nothing but Secy Treas's signature.
As defined by 18 U.S. Code § 2339B with final review by the district courts. See Sec 4 (F).
I suppose in the interim it is a tool for harassment.
Guilty until proven innocent.
Republicans are more, "give us a name and we'll find the crime". Guilty and innocence mean fuck all to these cunts.
Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.

I've heard them say that Some Law is going to prevent Trump from doing X horrible thing, so everyone need not sweat it. Meanwhile, I honestly don't know if we're ever going to get to vote again while the lib-sphere thinks is going to be business as usual.

I hope the they're right, but to me it's just more evidence of the especially limp dickery that the Dems have displayed over the past 8+ years.
Are you mixing up liberal and conservative?
 
Are you mixing up liberal and conservative?
On the internet nowadays, "liberal" is a derogatory term used to describe out of touch Democrats like Pelosi and Biden. Think of it as the left wing version of RINO. CS was using it in that context.
 
Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.

I've heard them say that Some Law is going to prevent Trump from doing X horrible thing, so everyone need not sweat it. Meanwhile, I honestly don't know if we're ever going to get to vote again while the lib-sphere thinks is going to be business as usual.

I hope the they're right, but to me it's just more evidence of the especially limp dickery that the Dems have displayed over the past 8+ years.
Are you mixing up liberal and conservative?

I'll guess that Loren is responding to the clause I've reddened, and has attached the phrase "by liberals (here)" to "end of due process" rather than to "the recognition", which is what I think Colonel Sanders intended.

Did I guess right?
 
Yep. I don't know that I'd call it encouraging, but the recognition of the serious potential end of due process by liberals here is so much more in touch with reality than younger libs and liberal podcasts.

I've heard them say that Some Law is going to prevent Trump from doing X horrible thing, so everyone need not sweat it. Meanwhile, I honestly don't know if we're ever going to get to vote again while the lib-sphere thinks is going to be business as usual.

I hope the they're right, but to me it's just more evidence of the especially limp dickery that the Dems have displayed over the past 8+ years.
Are you mixing up liberal and conservative?

I'll guess that Loren is responding to the clause I've reddened, and has attached the phrase "by liberals (here)" to "end of due process" rather than to "the recognition", which is what I think Colonel Sanders intended.

Did I guess right?

Ah. I see it, too.

the recognition (of the serious potential end of due process) by liberals

vs.

the recognition of the serious potential (end of due process by liberals)
 
So, the answer is Liz Cheney.
article said:
In the report, Loudermilk singles out Cheney, a longtime top target of Trump, and claims that she colluded with former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, whose explosive testimony was crucial to the former select committee’s investigation.

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation” the report reads.
What laws could have been broken? Unless Hutchison perjured herself, she is allowed to testify.
 
she is allowed to testify
That’s so last week. Nobody is allowed to say anything bad about El Lardo henceforth. Double penalty if it’s true.
Retribution will be sure and swift.
One of the first acts of Jimmy Carter as President was to issue a blanket pardon for all draft-dodgers.

Is there some way to phrase a blanket pardon for all the patriots who resisted Trumpism during the 2016-2024 years?
 
So, the answer is Liz Cheney.
article said:
In the report, Loudermilk singles out Cheney, a longtime top target of Trump, and claims that she colluded with former Trump White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson, whose explosive testimony was crucial to the former select committee’s investigation.

“Based on the evidence obtained by this Subcommittee, numerous federal laws were likely broken by Liz Cheney, the former Vice Chair of the January 6 Select Committee, and these violations should be investigated by the Federal Bureau of Investigation” the report reads.
What laws could have been broken? Unless Hutchison perjured herself, she is allowed to testify.
Well, they've expanded the definition of collusion to include "within 500 feet of each other" and evidence to include "words that come out of the prosecutor's mouth".
 
Apparently Liz giving Cass the information that she was not allowed to interact with her directly was an act of. … something. Terrorism, treason, murder - who cares? The Rumpsuckung morons will believe anything.
 
Most sickening of all: if Trump, as expected, sets DOJ up as his personal revenge force, devoting crazy amounts of resources into pursuing the retribution he's been bleating about all year, just wait until a terrorist attack happens. Trump is a master at evading responsibility, so he would try to seize the moment to amass even more executive power. From all of I've seen of the Trumpies, they would never put 2 + 2 together to realize that Trump had the watchdogs busy digging for nonexistent bones (the Enemy Within) while the Enemy from Without grabbed the opportunity to strike.
 
Back
Top Bottom