Republicans Seem To Have A Big Pedophile Problem

[ZiprHead]

Here it is:The Biden-Harris terrorist administration fed a pipeline of children into sex trafficking and slave labor in our country.

One of the most shocking investigations ever conducted in the halls of the U.S. Congress:Two separate investigations, just off by only 5%, confirm that 70% of the VETTING DOCUMENTATION turned in by sponsors was falsified by NGOs.

Rep. Clay Higgins: “This executive branch is building criminal files. So, I hope they’re watching, I hope they’re frightened, and I hope they’re getting their affairs in order — hiring their liberal attorneys to defend them.

Be advised, we’re building criminal case files. We’re interviewing these 35,000 kids, and we’re finding out exactly what happened and how they ended up into the nightmare where they were. “We are going to identify these children, we’re locating them, we’re rescuing them, and we’re building criminal files based on the testimony of these children and the documentation of fraudulent vetting — and many of these NGO employees are going to find themselves wearing orange.

”In other words, the Biden-Harris terrorist, which bribed NGOs to facilitate an invasion, was also responsible for vetting pedophiles—all at the expense of American taxpayers.

 

[Derec]

Former NH state representative enters guilty plea in connection to child sex abuse images case

Former New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie Laughton pleaded guilty in federal court in Boston to charges including sexual exploitation of children in a child sex abuse images case.
The plea comes after her former partner, Lindsay Groves, admitted last month to taking sexually explicit photos of children at the Massachusetts day care where she worked and sending them to Laughton.
Federal investigators said four photos of children who appeared to be between 3 and 5 years old were sent to Laughton.
Officials said Laughton asked Groves for the photos and the two exchanged thousands of text messages about them.

This article does not mention it, but Laughton is a Democrat. From an earlier article:
Child Porn Trial Back on Track for Former NHDem Rep Laughton and Partner

Laughton, 41, of Nashua, became a star attraction in the state Democratic Party as New Hampshire’s first transgender person elected to the legislature. State party chair Ray Buckley even gave Laughton a shoutout as one of the “LGBTQIA+ Democrats who are the backbone of the Granite State,” despite the legislator’s criminal record at the time.
Born Barry Laughton, the historic 2012 election win was short-lived as past criminal convictions soon came to light. Laughton was forced out of office weeks after the 2012 election when it was revealed he was still on probation for a felony theft charge. Laughton was subsequently charged with stalking and making bomb threats.
Laughton’s gender identity as a transgender woman has never been straightforward. It was not clear how far Laughton’s medical transition had progressed. Laughton appears to be balding with many masculine features, though the convicted felon wears makeup and clothing traditionally identified with women.
Laughton was married for many years to Lisa Laughton, the alleged co-conspirator in the 2008 fraud case that resulted in the felony conviction that temporarily derailed Laughton’s political career. Laughton also conducted a long-term sexual relationship with Groves. Both Groves and Lisa Laughton are biological women.

 

[Jarhyn]

I can't help but think that the same folks who claimed they arrested a hundred drug dealers after arresting a hundred homeless people are a bit pants-on-fire.

None of the normal qualities that may make someone think a claim is true are present here.

There is a scary looking number, but that number look a more like a "total of children who passed through the program" and not actually an accounting of victims of some real act.

Also, there are no details here about what program, who was actually in charge of it, how it was structured, what the stated purpose of the program was, or anything about it.

Instead it looks more like someone counted the number of children that transitioned through various detached government systems, and that the administration is drag netting.

There is no where, or why here, and there is barely a what and who is uselessly vague (WHO within the Biden organization?)

Usually that's the first sign of a hasty lie.

Compare this with the following: Donald Trump and Jeffrey Epstein personally raped multiple known and identified individuals on an island because they personally are pedophiles; they then invited many other wealthy and powerful people to do likewise for a Honeypot blackmail scam of global proportions, with several reports indicating Trump's preference for girls that resembled his own daughter.

Clear names, known direct involvement, actual motives, established dates for activities, named actors.

 

[Elixir]

Condoning or even encouraging racism, misogyny and sex crimes is almost a guiding principle of the Republican agenda these days.

These days are very little different from those days. The last decades when Repugs had any rightful claim to high ground was probably the 1950s.

If MAGGOTs could see themselves as well-informed people do, they'd be ashamed.

The complete lack of self-awareness and unbreakable shamelessness that defines the MAGAt segment is not a naturally developed state. It is carefully cultivated, fed by fear and reinforced by intentionally inflicted pain.

 

[Swammerdami]

Former New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie Laughton pleaded guilty ...

Let me remind non-Americans that a "state Rep." is NOT what is commonly meant by a "Rep." There are about 1000 top politicians in Washington who rank as a "Rep" (Representative to Congress) or higher. There are 50 states, so 50 batches of "State Reps" and, while not quite "a dime a dozen," politicians of this importance form a MUCH larger pool than the top 1000 Feds.

New Hampshire is not a large state: it ranks #42 out of the 50 by population. And the N.H. legislature has 424 members (400+24 for the two Houses). California -- a state which dwarfs New Hampshire -- has only 120 legislators (80+40).

IOW, Derec is "scraping the bottom of the barrel" to come up with a sex offender, supposedly on a par with Speaker Dennis Hastert, a rapist whose position was so high he would automatically have become President if Clinton-Gore both died during 1999-2000 or Bush-Cheney both died during 2001-2007. Hastert molested at least four boys as young as 14 years of age during his time as a high school wrestling coach.

This article does not mention it, but Laughton is a Democrat.

Yes; Derec really would comb through newspapers, and then research party affiliation to find a counterpart to Repugnants like Hastert. The fact that he was satisfied to find a STATE Rep tells us all we need to know. And we don't know how many state Reps he had to pass up before extra Googling found one with the dreadful "Dem" label!

From an earlier article:

Laughton, 41, of Nashua, became a star attraction in the state Democratic Party as New Hampshire’s first transgender person elected to the legislature.

Transgender too! "Two birds with one stone" for the haters of Dems and queers. Congrats to Derec, I guess. Try using ChatGPT: With precise instruction it can probably find another handful of state Reps as "evidence" to support your "same same" delusion.

 

[Elixir]

Hmm. Who would have ever suspected such a thing?

BREAKING: DOJ BOMBSHELL — Epstein files reportedly “even worse for Trump” than Republicans feared.
The panic inside the Republican party — due to its decisive losses in Tuesday’s elections — just got even more frantic.
Multiple House Republicans are reportedly freaking out after hearing from the Department of Justice that the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files are especially compromising for Donald Trump.
According to veteran reporter David Shuster — who’s worked for MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News — “rumors are sweeping through the GOP caucus” that the Epstein evidence includes photos of Trump with half-naked teenage girls.
Shuster says several Republicans told him they’d been quietly warned by contacts inside DOJ and the FBI that the material is even worse than the claims made by Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who described seeing “a dozen Polaroids” of Trump and Epstein with topless young women “spread out like a deck of cards.”
You read that right.
Trump’s own biographer says he personally saw the pictures — and the DOJ supposedly has copies.
Now Republicans are reportedly “spooked.”
And after Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to answer Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s direct question about whether she’d seen those photos, the tension exploded behind closed doors.
Bondi tried to dodge by throwing out false attacks about Democratic donors — but Whitehouse fired back, calling her statement a flat-out lie.
Let’s be clear: If this report is true, the Epstein files could expose a massive cover-up involving Trump and his allies. Republicans know it — and that’s why they’re terrified.
While Trump rants about “witch hunts” on Truth Social, his old friend Epstein’s ghost keeps coming back to haunt him. And this time, it’s not Democrats he has to fear — it’s the truth.
And hopefully, the truth shall set us free.

- Occupy Demonkratz, an obviously impeachable source

 

[ZiprHead]

These things

Hmm. Who would have ever suspected such a thing?

BREAKING: DOJ BOMBSHELL — Epstein files reportedly “even worse for Trump” than Republicans feared.
The panic inside the Republican party — due to its decisive losses in Tuesday’s elections — just got even more frantic.
Multiple House Republicans are reportedly freaking out after hearing from the Department of Justice that the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files are especially compromising for Donald Trump.
According to veteran reporter David Shuster — who’s worked for MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News — “rumors are sweeping through the GOP caucus” that the Epstein evidence includes photos of Trump with half-naked teenage girls.
Shuster says several Republicans told him they’d been quietly warned by contacts inside DOJ and the FBI that the material is even worse than the claims made by Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who described seeing “a dozen Polaroids” of Trump and Epstein with topless young women “spread out like a deck of cards.”
You read that right.
Trump’s own biographer says he personally saw the pictures — and the DOJ supposedly has copies.
Now Republicans are reportedly “spooked.”
And after Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to answer Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s direct question about whether she’d seen those photos, the tension exploded behind closed doors.
Bondi tried to dodge by throwing out false attacks about Democratic donors — but Whitehouse fired back, calling her statement a flat-out lie.
Let’s be clear: If this report is true, the Epstein files could expose a massive cover-up involving Trump and his allies. Republicans know it — and that’s why they’re terrified.
While Trump rants about “witch hunts” on Truth Social, his old friend Epstein’s ghost keeps coming back to haunt him. And this time, it’s not Democrats he has to fear — it’s the truth.
And hopefully, the truth shall set us free.

- Occupy Demonkratz, an obviously impeachable source

These files are going to come out sooner or later. Trump's best hope is that he is flying on his new Qatari Air Force 1 at the time of the files release and he can redirect the fight to Russia.

I hope Bondi, Patel, Bongino, and anyone else who aided in this coverup get charged for doing so.

 

[Jarhyn]

These things

Hmm. Who would have ever suspected such a thing?

BREAKING: DOJ BOMBSHELL — Epstein files reportedly “even worse for Trump” than Republicans feared.
The panic inside the Republican party — due to its decisive losses in Tuesday’s elections — just got even more frantic.
Multiple House Republicans are reportedly freaking out after hearing from the Department of Justice that the unreleased Jeffrey Epstein files are especially compromising for Donald Trump.
According to veteran reporter David Shuster — who’s worked for MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News — “rumors are sweeping through the GOP caucus” that the Epstein evidence includes photos of Trump with half-naked teenage girls.
Shuster says several Republicans told him they’d been quietly warned by contacts inside DOJ and the FBI that the material is even worse than the claims made by Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who described seeing “a dozen Polaroids” of Trump and Epstein with topless young women “spread out like a deck of cards.”
You read that right.
Trump’s own biographer says he personally saw the pictures — and the DOJ supposedly has copies.
Now Republicans are reportedly “spooked.”
And after Attorney General Pam Bondi refused to answer Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse’s direct question about whether she’d seen those photos, the tension exploded behind closed doors.
Bondi tried to dodge by throwing out false attacks about Democratic donors — but Whitehouse fired back, calling her statement a flat-out lie.
Let’s be clear: If this report is true, the Epstein files could expose a massive cover-up involving Trump and his allies. Republicans know it — and that’s why they’re terrified.
While Trump rants about “witch hunts” on Truth Social, his old friend Epstein’s ghost keeps coming back to haunt him. And this time, it’s not Democrats he has to fear — it’s the truth.
And hopefully, the truth shall set us free.

- Occupy Demonkratz, an obviously impeachable source

These files are going to come out sooner or later. Trump's best hope is that he is flying on his new Qatari Air Force 1 at the time of the files release and he can redirect the fight to Russia.

I hope Bondi, Patel, Bongino, and anyone else who aided in this coverup get charged for doing so.

No, you see, he's going to do his dragnet thing, and arrest everyone who could actually bring consequences because (unspecified) did (unspecified) (they say).

 

[Swammerdami]

According to veteran reporter David Shuster — who’s worked for MSNBC, CNN, and Fox News — “rumors are sweeping through the GOP caucus” that the Epstein evidence includes photos of Trump with half-naked teenage girls.
Shuster says several Republicans told him they’d been quietly warned by contacts inside DOJ and the FBI that the material is even worse than the claims made by Trump biographer Michael Wolff, who described seeing “a dozen Polaroids” of Trump and Epstein with topless young women “spread out like a deck of cards.”

These files are going to come out sooner or later. Trump's best hope is that he is flying on his new Qatari Air Force 1 at the time of the files release and he can redirect the fight to Russia.

I hope Bondi, Patel, Bongino, and anyone else who aided in this coverup get charged for doing so.

Nixon had his loyal secretary Rose Marie Woods for 20+ years and she erased the 18 minutes and 34 seconds^* of the most incriminating material from the infamous White House tapes. Does Trump have no loyal sycophant who will take the most incriminating photos home and use them as kindling for a barbecue?

Does anyone else find this puzzling? Do the Polaroids of Trump fondling underage "playgirls" even still exist?

Perhaps Trump, unlike Nixon, simply does not have any loyal sycophants. Michael Cohen his top fixer, Mike Pence his V.P., Scaramucci, Bolton: the long list of MAGGATs who've turned against the Orange Brat is lengthy. And why not? He is the vilest creature on the planet, offers loyalty to nobody, and disrespects everyone except Russia's Putin and North Korea's Kim. Even MAGGAT leaders like Bannon and Ailes just laugh at him behind his back.

So where are the Epstein files? Bondi claims that she had them; did she auction them to the highest bidder? Did Eric get a hold of some photos, hoping he'd get more love from Daddy? I suppose nobody would have a motive to destroy the files and lose their blackmail power: Loyalty to Trump is never rewarded.

* Speaking of the gap on the Nixon tapes, the official release of Arlo Guthrie's "Alice's Restaurant" also clocks in at exactly 18:34 ! Coincidence? I report; you decide.

 

[Don2 (Don1 Revised)]

I think at this point that anything that was incriminating has been removed. They've probably also replaced Republicans' heads with Biden's in photos. They've had far, far too long to not have manipulated the evidence at this point.

 

[Jarhyn]

I think at this point that anything that was incriminating has been removed. They've probably also replaced Republicans' heads with Biden's in photos. They've had far, far too long to not have manipulated the evidence at this point.

There's an issue here insofar as the actual files are not so easy to destroy, doctor, or manipulate.

It would take a dedicated team of hundreds of skilled writers and investigators an entire year to do all that, and then you have a team of a hundred loose ends who are all "skilled writers or investigators" that need to be "cleaned up" because they're humans and will absolutely talk about what happened.

They would need to research Biden's Alibis for over 20 years, and shift timings of meetings, to times where the other participants could have realistically held them.

Anything less will leave you with a trump-sized trump-shaped hole with biden's face clearly and messily duct-taped over it.

It would be easier to just burn every copy, destroy every photo, and just play dumb than to try to pull the most important (solid tungsten, inflexible) thread in a tapestry, and then reweave the rest of the tapestry to conform to a completely different solid tungsten thread.

It's not like a book, because they can only change the stories of people whose records they have full access to, and they only have full access to a few characters' story artifacts (mostly Trump's, and they don't even control all of those elements).

It's the same thing that most, or at least MANY hackers run into: you can falsify A log, but if the falsified log doesn't match the other logs, it's still obviously false.

 

[Elixir]

It would take a dedicated team of hundreds of skilled writers and investigators an entire year to do all that

Is that really true, and if so, is it really a problem?
How many copies of the most damning information are likely to exist?
Remember, cost is no object. The Felon could hire thousands of writer/investigators acting under the directions of Stephen Miller, and if it took a couple of years to sanitize everything, no problem.

They would need to research Biden's Alibis for over 20 years, and shift timings of meetings, to times where the other participants could have realistically held them.

You drastically underestimate trumpsuckers’ gullibility. No need to do anything that well. Just make a big enough mess that nobody can tell exactly what’s true or what actually happened, and they turn to Trump for DaTroof.
Just saw the fucktard announcing that he has brought “affordability” back after Biden destroyed it.
How many of his suckers believe his lies over their own eyes? Enough that he is still sullying our house.

 

[Swammerdami]

I think at this point that anything that was incriminating has been removed. They've probably also replaced Republicans' heads with Biden's in photos. They've had far, far too long to not have manipulated the evidence at this point.

There's an issue here insofar as the actual files are not so easy to destroy, doctor, or manipulate.
...
It would be easier to just burn every copy, destroy every photo, and just play dumb than to try to pull the most important (solid tungsten, inflexible) thread in a tapestry, and then reweave the rest of the tapestry to conform to a completely different solid tungsten thread.

Enemies like Putin already have any Kompromat they might need.

Informed rational Americans already know Trump's character without more photographic evidence. This group includes not only pro-democracy anti-Trumpists, but the rich and powerful scumbags riding Trump's coat-tails and hoping for fascist takeover.

Thus the original Epstein files, if they still exist at all, are relevant to only to MAGA fanatics, mostly morons and sluggards. MTG with her 95+ IQ was their intellectual leader but she's been distancing herself from the MAGA party line so any whining from her about photo-shopping or other falsifications will probably be ignored.

Ghislaine Maxwell will testify under oath that Trump was always a perfect gentleman; this will be treated as the most important good news since the Gospel of John.

 

[Elixir]

Informed rational Americans already know Trump's character without more photographic evidence. This group includes not only pro-democracy anti-Trumpists, but the rich and powerful scumbags riding Trump's coat-tails and hoping for fascist takeover.

QFT

 

[Jarhyn]

It would take a dedicated team of hundreds of skilled writers and investigators an entire year to do all that

Is that really true, and if so, is it really a problem?
How many copies of the most damning information are likely to exist?
Remember, cost is no object. The Felon could hire thousands of writer/investigators acting under the directions of Stephen Miller, and if it took a couple of years to sanitize everything, no problem.

They would need to research Biden's Alibis for over 20 years, and shift timings of meetings, to times where the other participants could have realistically held them.

You drastically underestimate trumpsuckers’ gullibility. No need to do anything that well. Just make a big enough mess that nobody can tell exactly what’s true or what actually happened, and they turn to Trump for DaTroof.
Just saw the fucktard announcing that he has brought “affordability” back after Biden destroyed it.
How many of his suckers believe his lies over their own eyes? Enough that he is still sullying our house.

I expect over 20 full copies of the majority of it existing at any time across numerous organizations, some specifically in the hands of people who will actively work to prevent their corruption or destruction such that if they suspect this is a thing that will happen, that they have made this now to be over 21 full copies.

I know for certain that if I had ever had contact with those files, even if I knew I could never release them myself without being taken on charges, I would squirrel it away for day the rain clouds part and the sunlight is ready to shine on it.

That said, even if the trump suckers are gullible enough, most people will be able to see that they have been doctored and this will not merely go away.

I'm unsure of the integrity of the other untold hundreds or thousands of people who have seen these documents, but if even one of them has half as much integrity as I claim I would, the originals would be technically I destroyable... Not to mention the fact that there's a completely separate set of files being built and maintained by the victims.

 

[Toni]

Former New Hampshire state Rep. Stacie Laughton pleaded guilty ...

Let me remind non-Americans that a "state Rep." is NOT what is commonly meant by a "Rep." There are about 1000 top politicians in Washington who rank as a "Rep" (Representative to Congress) or higher. There are 50 states, so 50 batches of "State Reps" and, while not quite "a dime a dozen," politicians of this importance form a MUCH larger pool than the top 1000 Feds.

New Hampshire is not a large state: it ranks #42 out of the 50 by population. And the N.H. legislature has 424 members (400+24 for the two Houses). California -- a state which dwarfs New Hampshire -- has only 120 legislators (80+40).

IOW, Derec is "scraping the bottom of the barrel" to come up with a sex offender, supposedly on a par with Speaker Dennis Hastert, a rapist whose position was so high he would automatically have become President if Clinton-Gore both died during 1999-2000 or Bush-Cheney both died during 2001-2007. Hastert molested at least four boys as young as 14 years of age during his time as a high school wrestling coach.

This article does not mention it, but Laughton is a Democrat.

Yes; Derec really would comb through newspapers, and then research party affiliation to find a counterpart to Repugnants like Hastert. The fact that he was satisfied to find a STATE Rep tells us all we need to know. And we don't know how many state Reps he had to pass up before extra Googling found one with the dreadful "Dem" label!

From an earlier article:

Laughton, 41, of Nashua, became a star attraction in the state Democratic Party as New Hampshire’s first transgender person elected to the legislature.

Transgender too! "Two birds with one stone" for the haters of Dems and queers. Congrats to Derec, I guess. Try using ChatGPT: With precise instruction it can probably find another handful of state Reps as "evidence" to support your "same same" delusion.

Only a fool would think that Democrats are free of mental illnesses or sick predilections regarding sex, attraction to inappropriate persons, or any other sort of evil. Bill Clinton was credibly accused of rape by more than one women. I believed them then and I still believe them. Unfortunately, the legal system and the voting public did not. He was elected twice. It’s also been widely rumored that Clinton made multiple trips to Epstein’s island. This may or may not be true but please, let us not pretend that Democrats or Republicans have any particularly unique to political beliefs sexual predilections.

What is most interesting to me is that apparently everyone is skipping right past the part where someone born male who transitioned ( in Emily’s parlance, a biological male) just plead guilty to soliciting inappropriate images of young children.

Now, I know that it is indeed possible for women to sexually abuse other women, men and children. It appears much more common for males to sexually abuse others but it is also likely that it is less reported or prosecuted when the perpetrators are female.

 

[Toni]

I think at this point that anything that was incriminating has been removed. They've probably also replaced Republicans' heads with Biden's in photos. They've had far, far too long to not have manipulated the evidence at this point.

There's an issue here insofar as the actual files are not so easy to destroy, doctor, or manipulate.
...
It would be easier to just burn every copy, destroy every photo, and just play dumb than to try to pull the most important (solid tungsten, inflexible) thread in a tapestry, and then reweave the rest of the tapestry to conform to a completely different solid tungsten thread.

Enemies like Putin already have any Kompromat they might need.

Informed rational Americans already know Trump's character without more photographic evidence. This group includes not only pro-democracy anti-Trumpists, but the rich and powerful scumbags riding Trump's coat-tails and hoping for fascist takeover.

Thus the original Epstein files, if they still exist at all, are relevant to only to MAGA fanatics, mostly morons and sluggards. MTG with her 95+ IQ was their intellectual leader but she's been distancing herself from the MAGA party line so any whining from her about photo-shopping or other falsifications will probably be ignored.

Ghislaine Maxwell will testify under oath that Trump was always a perfect gentleman; this will be treated as the most important good news since the Gospel of John.

No, those files are relevant to all of those victimized by Epstein and his special friends. Whether the victims are still living or dead.

Charges should be brought against all credibly accused of rape, particularly of minors. Whoever they are. And if found guilty, they should receive very long prison sentences, and any assets they hold should be forfeited to help mitigate the pain and suffering and therapy bills of the victims.

 

[Elixir]

If I had ever had contact with those files, even if I knew I could never release them myself without being taken on charges, I would squirrel it away for day the rain clouds part and the sunlight is ready to shine on it.

If I had those files I’d make a hundred copies and squirrel them away with lawyers, knowing that if a person of my history and stature came forward with the them nobody would believe any of it.

 

[Elixir]

Epstein files, if they still exist at all, are relevant to only to MAGA fanatics, mostly morons and sluggards

I don’t argue with the characterization, but I suspect that in the unlikely event of a full disclosure, Epstein will suddenly be of no real importance to MAGAts at large.

 

[Jarhyn]

Epstein files, if they still exist at all, are relevant to only to MAGA fanatics, mostly morons and sluggards

I don’t argue with the characterization, but I suspect that in the unlikely event of a full disclosure, Epstein will suddenly be of no real importance to MAGAts at large.

The problem is they built their brand, in the deep Christian parts of america, on the line of shooting, "pedophiles" while they said it to mean "gay people", the fact that Donald Trump and his regime are buried to past their noses on Epstein Island cannot end well for them.

I'm honestly worried, however, about what is going to happen afterwards, because once this pedophile thing actually does start getting addressed there will be a lot of justifiably angry people who for all their separation will be unified and moving together and making decisions as an emotional mob and that never ends well.

We could still end up at "pedophile trials" in which gay and kinky people end up under attack.

I think we should be aware well in advance if that ever happens that we have to be ready for some attempt to throw adult communities of adults doing fully consensual things with only adults under a bus because they're really weird.