One morning - who knows? Perhaps Europeans will wake up to find that their precious European identity is no longer European, but middle eastern! Or, worse yet, what if they turn Japanese???
OH NOOOoooes! Woe is us.
A lot. What does that have to do with the fact that the media, this forum and even the Biden/Garland DOJ is treating politically motivated crimes very differently based on whether they were motivated by left- or right wing Ideologies.
If I am then so is Zipr starting this thread. You can't have it both ways.
I think you have mistaken him with Montez Lee. It was Lee who committed a deadly arson with political motivation and got 10 years, well below federal sentencing guidelines because one of Garland's prosecutor argued that because he committed arson due to his #BLM ideology, he should get a light sentence.
There is nothing to indicate Ritt was a "coward". He defended himself from attack by three Antifa thugs, two of them convicted felons and one of them a child molester with a death wish.
That was a less textbook case than Rittenhouse, but still the evidence presented at trial showed that it was likely self defense. Z had injuries to the back of his head, consistent with being pummeled against the pavement, and Trayvon had abrasions on his knuckles consistent with giving somebody a dose of whoop-ass. So yes, most likely Trayvon attacked Z and Z defended himself.
Not counterexamples. Both were prosecuted vigorously even though the facts were on the defendant's side. And media as well as most posters on here were firmly on the side of Trayvon and the Antifa thugs (Rosenbaum, Huber and Grosskreutz) respectively.
Goes more for your posts. Especially when you are so off base on facts.
Description of this smiley is "hysterical" and that describes you well.
Japanese are not sending millions of bogus asylum seekers into Europe who then have 5-10 children each, as is Muslim custom.
Reactionary balderdash (see below)
Different prosecutors, different states. Mr Lee's prosecutor did not argue for a reduced sentence due to his #BLM ideology but you have presented evidence to consistent with bigotry. Mr. Lee did not intend to kill anyone and burned down a pawn shop. Mr. Masengill threw a Molotov cocktail at a health care facility depriving potential clients access to health care services.
More reactionary bigoted balderdash. Only cowards, criminals or police carry weapons to a protest. Mr. Ritt is not a police officer, so there is something to indicate he is either a coward or a criminal.
Both federal prosecutions, so different states doesn't matter.
Of course he has. He was open about that. You can read the original document. He is excusing and minimizing Lee's behavior because he is a #BLMer.
[citation needed]
Many people on your side carried weapons, including rifles, to protests. Are they all cowards and criminals or just those who are opposed to #BLMers burning down businesses, court houses and museums?
Of course it matters. Different states have different cultures and different ways of looking at the world. You've presented no evidence the case was "politicized" in the normal understanding of the word.
The prosecutor did not mention #BLM - perhaps all that rocking of your #BLM hobby horse has addled your reading comprehension?
Why on earth are you babbling about "my side"? My statement is clear and unequivocal - there were no exceptions. It does appear that all that rocking of your #BLM hobby horse has addled your reading comprehension.
Again, both of these were federal prosecutions using federal laws and federal sentencing guidelines.
That would be the beginning of an argument if these were state prosecutions. But again, these were federal cases.
I have presented such evidence, in the form of the memorandum in the Lee case where the prosecutor argued for leniency based on Lee's #BLM politics. That you refuse to read it or are unwilling and/or incapable of understanding it is a different matter altogether.
He mentioned the riot that Montez Lee participated in. You are seriously lacking reading comprehension if you cannot understand what riot (or "protest") he meant.
Far leftists. Like Warlord Raz and his goons who took over several city blocks in Seattle for weeks with armed force but were never prosecuted.
So why do you never say anything against Warlord Raz or Huey Newton Gun Club or the New Black Panther Party? You are not fooling anybody.
JFC, injuries have absolutely no bearing on who started a fight. Bullies that start fights get beat down all the time when they mess with the wrong person. You're grasping at straws. Martin was on the phone with his girlfriend when he was attacked, this was testified in court. Given Zimmerman's behavior after he was acquitted it's pretty obvious he's a racist bully.
But that’s not illegal. Nosiree, not in Murka!
Unironically this. Being an asshole does not preclude somebody from exercising self defense.
Of course they have bearing. They are evidence. Things like abrasions on knuckles, that Trayvon had but Z did not indicate that it was T who hit Z, and that Z did not hit T. That is also consistent with the injuries to Z's head. Other than abrasions on his knuckles (which are evidence of him hitting Z) and the gunshot wound, there are no other injuries on T.
What do you mean by "start fights"? Hit somebody or merely do something to provoke somebody by e.g. following that somebody? There was no evidence Z hit T.
No, you are.
There was no evidence Z attacked T. Yes, he followed him. But that's not the same.
He may be a bully (doubt the "racist" part which is overused these days), and he certainly behaved poorly after the acquittal.
Or various black militias that marched all over the place in 2020. You (or Swammerdami, or Elixir) never say anything against them. But plenty against Rittenhouse who defended himself against physical attacks by your boys.
Again, the injuries have no bearing upon who started the fight.
There is evidence Z attacked M. M's girlfriend testified to that effect.
So now you're defending bullies.
The fact you think anyone protesting about police violence against black people is necessarily #BLM says volumes about your irrational obsession.Derec said:
See comment above.Derec said:
More babble about my side.Derec said:Far leftists. Like Warlord Raz and his goons who took over several city blocks in Seattle for weeks with armed force but were never prosecuted.
Or various black militias that marched all over the place in 2020. You (or Swammerdami, or Elixir) never say anything against them. But plenty against Rittenhouse who defended himself against physical attacks by your boys.
I don’t say anything about most people, especially ones I have never heard about. Using your standard, Donald Trump is your boy.Derec said:
www.houstonpublicmedia.org
