Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez on Instagram: “Roe Overturned: Action items & where we go from here”
She did some fundraising for some abortion activists. She said that a lot of things that some political leaders are saying are messages that can make one feel helpless. She says that it's important to go out and vote, but that it is necessary but not sufficient. One should also become an activist. One also should not quit when one fails - one should try again with different methods.
Donating to abortion funds is good, even if not enough. If you have the money, then do that. One shouldn't donate if one is scrapped for cash. If one has a couch or a spare room, one can lend it out to some abortion refugee from a red state. But if you don't have that, then one shouldn't do it.
What talents do you have? What can one offer on a consistent basis? Like being an artist or writer or having digital skills. She says "consistent basis" because activists have to be in it on a long term, and that was the problem with the Black Lives Matter demonstrations of 2020 - those activists didn't stay active for long enough. That was also a problem for the Occupy Wall Street activists. Despite the original Zuccotti Park campers getting a lot of imitators, their camps lasted only a few months before being closed down by the local authorities, and the campers did not find new campsites.
With the overturning of RvW, the women that are worst off are poor and minority women. The overturning also effects what to do about ectopic pregnancy, something that even the richest women can suffer from. She suggests doing lots of small actions instead of wondering what big ones that one can do. That is much like the anti-abortion strategy of many red states, essentially trying to regulate it out of existence with TRAP laws and the like.
She says that her colleagues ought to donate some of their campaign funds to abortion funds, or else to frontline colleagues, those in vulnerable seats, to keep out the Republicans. Like Ohio and Georgia. For the latter state, she made a mistake, describing both its two Senators as vulnerable. It's Sen. Raphael Warnock who is up for re-election, and he's vulnerable. Sen. Jon Ossoff is safe in his seat until 2026. She think that Iowa may have a chance for a Democratic pickup, unseating long-time Republican incumbent Chuck Grassley. He's 88 years old and he's been in office for 42 years, 7 Senate terms.
She has tips for people in both blue and red areas. In a blue area, one should adopt a swing seat to help campaign in, and one should vote in the primaries -- and be sure to assess the candidates. Democrats aren't all alike, she says. Who is serving communities vs. who is coasting. Like some long-time incumbent who seems more preoccupied with DC power politics than their constituents. Like the one that AOC unseated.
She says that one should be concerned about local and state as well as about Congress, and she offers her endorsements for local and state elections.
She then gets into policy issues. What do our leaders plan to do? Other than wring their hands about how little they can do. She proposes opening abortion clinics on Federal lands in red states - national parks, military bases, etc. Then the Hyde Amendment. She then praises Ayanna Pressley for leading on repealing that amendment. Some people were cowardly on it, however. She recalls the Trump years, where Trump would go ahead with something even if others disapproved. Even getting something for a few months until a court strikes it down would be better than nothing.
Another thing is educating people about abortion pills. Then about Supreme Court Justice candidates lying about not overturning RvW. She says that letting that happen means the erosion of the confirmation process. She then talks about how unrepresentative the Court has become. Also the selectivity of the Court in its recent gun rulings.
She then noted Abraham Lincoln disregarding the Supreme Court to issue the Emancipation Proclamation, overriding the court's Dred Scott ruling. Then FDR threatening to pack the court to protect the New Deal. He failed, but the Court backed off.
She then recapped what she said earlier, noting that a lot of activists have been activists for a long time. Also about politicians, some have served too long while doing too little, some have taken money from the wrong places, etc. Does a candidate have an online presence? Like a website or a social-media page, something that makes that candidate easily researchable. Also, requesting funds is not enough. What will that money be for? What seats to try to pick up?
She grumbled about leaders who don't do much, saying that those who prefer supposed norms to action may end up not having their norms. Like Democrats who cherish the Senate filibuster losing it to the Republicans. She also described getting $3M for a local hospital's maternal-health wing.