• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

RussiaGate

See Russian state TV's reaction to this Tucker Carlson banner - YouTube

"CNN's Matthew Chance looks at how Russian state TV is reacting to Fox News host Tucker Carlson's coverage of President Joe Biden and the build up of Russian military along the Ukrainian border."

Like TC saying about Ukraine that Russia only wants to keep its western border secure. What a total turnaround from right-wing rhetoric of half a century ago. Right-wingers back then would have warned about repeating the appeasement deal with Adolf Hitler at Munich in 1938, but now their position is, relative to that deal, that AH was justified in wanting to protect ethnic Germans in Czechoslovakia.

The CNN clip showed a Russian news show that featured people appreciating TC's position. Then Trump's Putin-loving. Russian TV is now anti-Biden. Then Julia Ioffe, a Russian-born journalist. She noted that US right-wing organizations started reaching out to Russia a decade ago, the likes of the World Congress on Families, and that it's become especially strong under Trump.

Russian state media and US right-wing media now talk to each other and reinforce each other, to the point where it can be hard to distinguish between Pervy Kanal ("Channel One") and Fox News. Like coverage of the BLM demonstrations of last year, that it was all looters and terrorists, that it was about humiliating white people, and the like, and Joe Biden being barely with it and having one foot in the grave and the like. Now saying that Democrats are socialists and radicals who want to imitate Soviet-style socialism and that the Republicans are sane. When it became public that some American intelligence agencies had concluded that some Russian intelligence agencies helped Trump win, self-described Republicans came to think much better of Russia and Vladimir Putin.
 
lpetrich, kinda makes all that "New Soviet Union" thing stupid, does not it?
Current ruling party and your trumpo-publicans loving each other.

Russian state media is stupid, they do go around and find idiots which share their opinion. They don't care for quality of these people, all they need is somebody who formally agrees with them.

Having said all that, democrats are guilty of the same sin. They are guilty of playing with leftists.

In other words, democrats can't win without crazies on the left, republicans can't win without imbeciles on the right, and Putin needs anybody on the west to like him.

What you american idiots need is to get rid of two party system so democrats can split from leftists and republicans can split from trumpers.
 
It should be handled with proper jurisprudence, just like 2020 election claims.
Well, claims of Trump-Alfa conspiracy were handled by Mueller investigation. They found them to be not credible.
Why do you keep repeating this falsehood?
Probably so he doesn't have to confront stuff like this:

On November 3, 2015, the day after the Trump Organization transmitted the LOI, Sater
emailed Cohen suggesting that the Trump Moscow project could be used to increase candidate
Trump’s chances at being elected, writing:

"Buddy our boy can become President of the USA and we can engineer it. I will get all of
Putins team to buy in on this, I will manage this process. . . . Michael, Putin gets on stage
with Donald for a ribbon cutting for Trump Moscow, and Donald owns the republican
nomination. And possibly beats Hillary and our boy is in. . . . We will manage this process
better than anyone. You and I will get Donald and Vladimir on a stage together very

shortly."
 
It should be handled with proper jurisprudence, just like 2020 election claims.
Well, claims of Trump-Alfa conspiracy were handled by Mueller investigation. They found them to be not credible.
Why do you keep repeating this falsehood?
First of all it's a fact, second of all I already explained.

There is the Mueller report. Please point out where it says anything about investigating the server connection, let alone coming to a conclusion on it.
 
It should be handled with proper jurisprudence, just like 2020 election claims.
Well, claims of Trump-Alfa conspiracy were handled by Mueller investigation. They found them to be not credible.
Why do you keep repeating this falsehood?
First of all it's a fact, second of all I already explained.

There is the Mueller report. Please point out where it says anything about investigating the server connection, let alone coming to a conclusion on it.
I already answered that. Falsehood repeating is what Rachel Maddow was/is doing.
 

“Based on the FBI’s assessment, the Committee did not find the DNS activity reflected the existence of covert communication between Alfa Bank and Trump Organization personnel. However, the Committee also could not positively determine an intent or purpose that would explain the unusual activity.”

So, these motherfuckers who created that theory better never travel to Russia because they will end up in russian prison.
As for the second part, I have a bridge to sell to that Committee.
 

“Based on the FBI’s assessment, the Committee did not find the DNS activity reflected the existence of covert communication between Alfa Bank and Trump Organization personnel. However, the Committee also could not positively determine an intent or purpose that would explain the unusual activity.”

So, these motherfuckers who created that theory better never travel to Russia because they will end up in russian prison.
As for the second part, I have a bridge to sell to that Committee.
That's not the Mueller report.
Barbos said:
Well, claims of Trump-Alfa conspiracy were handled by Mueller investigation. They found them to be not credible.
 
That's not the Mueller report.
It does not need to be. That would be waste of electrons and source of embarrassment.
That's a strange way for you to say "Sorry, I was wrong."
No, I was right and you were wrong.
But if you insist. I agree Russian Federation should sue Mueller for failing to include that into his report. He did piss poor job writing it.
It wasn't included in the report because he didn't investigate it.
 
That's not the Mueller report.
It does not need to be. That would be waste of electrons and source of embarrassment.
That's a strange way for you to say "Sorry, I was wrong."
No, I was right and you were wrong.
But if you insist. I agree Russian Federation should sue Mueller for failing to include that into his report. He did piss poor job writing it.
It wasn't included in the report because he didn't investigate it.
He did.
 
That's not the Mueller report.
It does not need to be. That would be waste of electrons and source of embarrassment.
That's a strange way for you to say "Sorry, I was wrong."
No, I was right and you were wrong.
But if you insist. I agree Russian Federation should sue Mueller for failing to include that into his report. He did piss poor job writing it.
It wasn't included in the report because he didn't investigate it.
He did.
Citation?
 
There are some unredacted items in the Mueller report and it is probably worthwhile to have not only a look, but to also get the Trump defenders interpretations and the opposite interpretations to find some balance. In the meantime, here is just one unredacted page:
sub-buzz-1462-1644615163-17.jpg

I have a question about this. So... ... ... when WikiLeaks secretly sent Don Jr a password over Twitter to a website putintrump.org, what in the actual fuck was Don Jr thinking? He then sent a message "it worked" and so that made him guilty of violating the law. What the heck was he thinking with that, too, that his father was going to protect him from prosecution? He is fortunate that the federal prosecutors used discretion, but unlike the prosecutors, I believe the website went public around Nov 1st, 2016 and hacking into it occurred September 2016 and so that foreknowledge of the website content for the campaign was probably worth $5K or more...just saying...
 
I have a question about this. So... ... ... when WikiLeaks secretly sent Don Jr a password over Twitter to a website putintrump.org, what in the actual fuck was Don Jr thinking? He then sent a message "it worked" and so that made him guilty of violating the law. What the heck was he thinking with that, too, that his father was going to protect him from prosecution? He is fortunate that the federal prosecutors used discretion, but unlike the prosecutors, I believe the website went public around Nov 1st, 2016 and hacking into it occurred September 2016 and so that foreknowledge of the website content for the campaign was probably worth $5K or more...just saying...

"..., although it was sent to him individually, had also been posted by WikiLeaks to its public Twitter account..."

In other words, it wasn't a secret at that point. He didn't get advance access.
 
"The Special Counsel's Office has identified no support for these allegations," Durham wrote, adding that the "lookups were far from rare in the United States."

"For example, the more complete data that Tech Executive-1 and his associates gathered--but did not provide to Agency 2--reflected that between approximately 2014 and 2017, there were a total of more than 3 million lookups of Russian Phone-Prover 1 IP addresses that originated with U.S.-based IP addresses," Durham wrote. "Fewer than 1,000 of these lookups originated with IP addresses affiliated with Trump Tower."

Durham added that data collected by Tech Executive-1 also found that lookups began as early as 2014, during the Obama administration and years before Trump took office, which he said, is "another fact which the allegations omitted."

Puts Yota-phone BS to rest.
 
Back
Top Bottom