• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

Sen. Feinstein Claims She Received Info On Kavanaugh And Sent It To FBI

Avenatti is hinting that Kavanaugh and others of his schoolmates would get girls/women drunk then gang rape or gang bang them. He says he has multiple witnesses.

Damn! :eek:

The dude's a media whore. Whatever he can do to get on camera. Why is creepy porn lawyer part of this anyway?

"Porn lawyer". Funny, that's a phrase commonly used on Fox to denigrate Avenatti. It explains so much about you.

BTW, how did his tussle with Michael Cohen turn out?
 
Avenatti is hinting that Kavanaugh and others of his schoolmates would get girls/women drunk then gang rape or gang bang them. He says he has multiple witnesses.

Damn! :eek:

The dude's a media whore. Whatever he can do to get on camera. Why is creepy porn lawyer part of this anyway?

"Porn lawyer". Funny, that's a phrase commonly used on Fox to denigrate Avenatti. It explains so much about you.

BTW, how did his tussle with Michael Cohen turn out?

Some here would rather have a porn star's client for President rather than porn star's lawyer. Go figure.
 
article said:
“Judge Kavanaugh and Ms. Dolphin attended one high school event together and shared a brief kiss good night following that event,” the statement continued. “They had no other such encounter. The language from Judge Kavanaugh’s high school yearbook refers to the fact that he and Ms. Dolphin attended that one high school event together and nothing else.”

8rAC.gif



Kavanaugh should be expelled from the DC Circuit for trying to pass that shit off as true. Jebus, what are we supposed to think they were, fucking Amish... as in being Amish, not actually fucking the Amish... though probably worth checking to see if there is any other "discrete" references of him and his buds lying about fucking the Amish in the yearbook.
 
Avenatti is hinting that Kavanaugh and others of his schoolmates would get girls/women drunk then gang rape or gang bang them. He says he has multiple witnesses.

Damn! :eek:

The dude's a media whore. Whatever he can do to get on camera. Why is creepy porn lawyer part of this anyway?
Well, this guy has serious media exposure at the moment, and he hasn't screwed up in court... yet, so seems like a viable person to contact. If what Avenatti is saying is not true, that is potential grounds for a lawsuit against him. They guy is shrewd, but he is also... well, shrewd. He seems to know exactly what he is doing.

So now we know that Kavanaugh was lying about fucking some girl in another school amongst his friends in high school in the yearbook, because apparently he was a virgin for a long time according to his interview on Fox News, and lying about the lying of it in the yearbook... we just danced. I mean for fuck sakes! The evidence against him is certainly limited to accusations, but everything he has said and done really seems to indicate that "Yes, I was a fucking drunk goon in school (and college?), and I probably just can't remember fumbling around trying to sexually assault a girl."
 
BSK in action.

MS. MacCALLUM: Do you believe there should be an F.B.I. investigation into these allegations and that a pause should happen and, you know, sort it all out? If there’s nothing to worry about and nothing to hide, why not have that process, Ashley? And then I’ll ask you that, Brett.
JUDGE KAVANAUGH: I mean, I’ve said all along and Ashley, too, I want to be heard. I was first interviewed last Monday, the day after the allegation appeared by the committee staff under penalty of felony, and I denied this categorically and unequivocally and I said twice during that, I said, “I want a hearing tomorrow,” last Tuesday, a week ago. I want an opportunity — a fair process. America’s about fairness, I want a fair process where I can defend my integrity and clear my name as quickly as I can in whatever forum the Senate deems appropriate.


He cuts off his wife and then totally evades the question.
 
Shocking to see gop operatives defend a gop operative.
 

In other words, there's no question about the dick incident, only a question of whose dick. That's a long way towards confirming her story.

Ah, no one can corroborate her story that it happened. No one. She gave witness names. And no one. She herself said, if it happened, she wasn't sure it was Kavanaugh. But six days with her lawyer and it became super clear after 30+ years. It's a #metoo miracle!

If they can't be certain who exposed the dick that clearly says they agree a dick was exposed.
 
Credible? How credible? Simply because it supports your politics? Ford gave five names of the people at her "party." She was one. All of the other four have denied it. Ramirez wasn't certain it was Kavanaugh after 30+ years. No one can corroborate her allegations. Only after SIX days of coaxing by her attorney did she become "certain" it was Kavanaugh. Shame on you.

Nobody has denied it. What they have said is they can't remember it, which is a very different thing. Remembering one small party of many that long ago would be the unusual thing even if we don't consider the blackout drinking that at least one of those others engaged in.

Oh, come on. The end result is the same - the absence of evidence in support of the accusation.

But "don't remember" is an abstain, as opposed to "it didn't happen" which would be a no vote. This is still only Ford vs Kavanaugh and the various things I've heard from his side of the story make me pretty sure it's Ford telling the truth.
 
It is ironic that Trumpsters would criticize a sleazy porn lawyer, given their sycophantic behavior when it comes to Trump himself. But that's how they roll.

Meanwhile, Avenatti did come forward with a claim of a new bombshell charge against Kavanaugh regarding alleged gang rapes. He is vigorously denying it, but it looks like he may have fallen victim to a dirty trick: Avenatti: I wasn’t scammed. If that isn't what happened, then where is the bombshell?

I think it more likely that this was an operation to undermine the entire sex scandal, and that is a problem that I have been complaining about ever since the Blasey Ford scandal emerged. There are far more easily proven problems with Kavanaugh than teenage sexual misconduct, yet the sex scandal has completely obliterated all of the other issues. Now Republicans have a clear path to "pushing through" with approval, as McConnell put it.

All they need to do is cast enough doubt on Blasey Ford and Ramirez to bulldoze wavering Republican senators and Red state Democrats into voting yes on confirmation. To that end, Senate Republicans seem to have hired an attack dog woman lawyer to do their questioning of Blasey Ford for them. That will save male Senators from the optics of dragging her through the mud. They hired a woman to bully her for them. Ramirez has been dismissed and locked out. No FBI involvement is allowed. And Kavanaugh gets to rebut Blasey Ford after she gives testimony. So far, Grassley has not even released the name of their hired gun, and he hasn't given the Democratic senators the courtesy of knowing how long they will be allowed to ask questions.

It is still not going to be easy for Republicans to confirm Kavanaugh in the open Senate, but they are hinting at a weekend session to call a quick confirmation vote. They don't appear to have all the votes they need yet, but, of course, claiming that they have them puts pressure on those threatening to break ranks.
 
First real crack, I think, in the GOP facade: Sen. Murkowski is stating that she wants Kavanaugh's second accuser also to testify. As well, she seems to favor some kind of FBI investigation of the allegations.

I'm wondering if Bill Cosby's conviction has something to do with it. Not his conviction this afternoon, but the reactions of some of his accusers. Some of them were quite compelling on the news today. Accusers bringing up acts way past the statute of limitations, talking about an above-reproach public figure. It's a song we've heard a lot of late.

https://www.cnn.com/2018/09/25/poli...augh-ramirez-ford-testify-congress/index.html
 
Murkowski still hasn't said she would vote against Kavanaugh, although she appears to be working up to it. Native Americans are an important constituency for her, and they appear opposed, so she is probably the most likely Republican to vote against confirmation. If so, a failure to confirm would still need one additional Republican without the loss of even a single Democrat.

One thing to bear in mind is that a number of significant cases are coming up soon before SCOTUS. Republicans want Kavanaugh on the Court to break ties. This is especially important to them, because they continue to count on gerrymandering as a method for helping them keep control of the House. A tie on an issue like that will leave actions in place that went against them in some lower court cases.
 
Michael Moore just called Kavanaugh Saint Brett, The Patron Saint of Keggers. I like it.
 
Meanwhile, Avenatti did come forward with a claim of a new bombshell charge against Kavanaugh regarding alleged gang rapes. He is vigorously denying it, but it looks like he may have fallen victim to a dirty trick: Avenatti: I wasn’t scammed. If that isn't what happened, then where is the bombshell?

He did say yesterday it would be a couple of days, and he hasn't backed down on it. I'll wait and see, but without knowing anything else about it, at first glance, I wouldn't trust someone who went to Avenatti with a sex abuse story. If you're serious, that's not the first guy you should think of to represent you.
 

IOW -<partisan bullshit, partisan bullshit, more partisan bullshit, We can't let this interfere with the distraction we have scheduled for Thursday re:RR, partsan bullshit, partisan bullshit>- got it. Also, I don't recall you ever actually answering my questions.
 
I Can’t Shake the Feeling That Kavanaugh Did Awful Things to Women to Win Male Approval

Good article by Lili Loofbourow at Slate: Brett Kavanaugh and the Cruelty of Male Bonding

Slate said:
For what it’s worth, and absent evidence or allegations to the contrary, I believe Brett Kavanaugh’s claim that he was a virgin through his teens. I believe it in part because it squares with some of the oddities I’ve had a hard time understanding about his alleged behavior: namely, that both allegations are strikingly different from other high-profile stories the past year, most of which feature a man and a woman alone. And yet both the Kavanaugh accusations share certain features: There is no penetrative sex, there are always male onlookers, and, most importantly, there’s laughter. In each case the other men—not the woman—seem to be Kavanaugh’s true intended audience. In each story, the cruel and bizarre act the woman describes—restraining Christine Blasey Ford and attempting to remove her clothes in her allegation, and in Deborah Ramirez’s, putting his penis in front of her face—seems to have been done in the clumsy and even manic pursuit of male approval. Even Kavanaugh’s now-notorious yearbook page, with its references to the “100 kegs or bust” and the like, seems less like an honest reflection of a fun guy than a representation of a try-hard willing to say or do anything as long as his bros think he’s cool. In other words: The awful things Kavanaugh allegedly did only imperfectly correlate to the familiar frame of sexual desire run amok; they appear to more easily fit into a different category—a toxic homosociality—that involves males wooing other males over the comedy of being cruel to women

This part of the article makes a very good point about Kavanaugh's choir boy act on Fox:

Slate said:
It goes without saying, I hope, that virgins are perfectly capable of doing everything Kavanaugh has so far been accused of. Offering a detail that personal was not only meant to be exculpatory in a specific sense; it was also deployed to counter an emerging image of Kavanaugh as a sleazy frat guy like his close friend and classmate Mark Judge. But he overshot the mark. If you’re going by his reactions in the Fox News interview, Kavanaugh’s wounded astonishment at the very existence of bad behavior would mean he couldn’t have known his good friend Mark Judge, who has written plenty about his own, very well at all. Kavanaugh’s strategy, in other words, was to present himself as all innocence: not just a virgin, but a virgin who’s never even heard of—let alone done!—some of the things he’s accused of. Everyone says so: “The women I knew in college and the men I knew in college said that it’s inconceivable that I could’ve done such a thing,” he said to Fox’s Martha MacCallum of Ramirez’s allegation.

This is an unwise thing to claim; first, because what people say you’re capable of isn’t actually proof of what you did or didn’t do, and second, because it happens to be untrue.
 
Back
Top Bottom