• Welcome to the new Internet Infidels Discussion Board, formerly Talk Freethought.

So what's next for Trump?

Loren Pechtel

Super Moderator
Staff member
Joined
Sep 16, 2000
Messages
37,531
Location
Nevada
Gender
Yes
Basic Beliefs
Atheist

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
"While we are disappointed that Mazars has chosen to part ways, their February 9, 2022 letter confirms that after conducting a subsequent review of all prior statements of financial condition, Mazars' work was performed in accordance with all applicable accounting standards and principles and that such statements of financial condition do not contain any material discrepancies," a Trump Organization spokesperson said Monday. "This confirmation effectively renders the investigations by the DA and AG moot."
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
... Mazars' work was performed in accordance with all applicable accounting standards and principles and that such statements of financial condition do not contain any material discrepancies," a Trump Organization spokesperson said Monday. "This confirmation effectively renders the investigations by the DA and AG moot."
Seems to me that they're saying THEY used the numbers YOU gave them, and applied "all applicable accounting standards and principles."

Doesn't mean the numbers you gave were good.

Which is pretty much what the DA and AG are concerned with...
 

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2001
Messages
38,407
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
What is the "conflict of interest"? Or is that legalese for, we were supposed to finish something but we aren't anymore due to potential liability from investigators, so we are playing the "COI" card?
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
What is the "conflict of interest"?
They'd have to choose between telling THEIR lies to stay out of jail or telling the client's lies to keep him out of jail. If he's not their client, they can just shout 'Circle of life!' and leave his ass for the wolves.
 

Artemus

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,203
Location
Bible Belt, USA
Basic Beliefs
Atheist and general cynic
What is the "conflict of interest"? Or is that legalese for, we were supposed to finish something but we aren't anymore due to potential liability from investigators, so we are playing the "COI" card?
According to George Conway it translates to
George Conway said:
"decision regarding the financial financial statements" =t hey are false because you lied
"totality of the circumstances" = the D.A. is serious
"non-waivable conflict of interest" = we are now on team D.A.
"not able to provide new work product" = sorry we're not going to jail for you

 

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2001
Messages
38,407
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
What is the "conflict of interest"? Or is that legalese for, we were supposed to finish something but we aren't anymore due to potential liability from investigators, so we are playing the "COI" card?
According to George Conway it translates to
George Conway said:
"decision regarding the financial financial statements" =t hey are false because you lied
"totality of the circumstances" = the D.A. is serious
"non-waivable conflict of interest" = we are now on team D.A.
"not able to provide new work product" = sorry we're not going to jail for you
Sounds like it is most accurately stated as "something is checking our work now, so ummm... *click*"
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
One of the things [Durham] revealed in that, which I have heard from other people is this claim that Rodney Joffe was accessing data from the White House," Wheeler said. "All of that data precedes Trump's inauguration, so you have Trump out there calling for these people to be put to death when really what happened is Rodney Joffe was trying to keep [then-president] Barack Obama safe from hackers. That's all it is. That's why Trump wants these people killed, Durham knows that."

"Durham knows that this data precedes Trump," she continued. "He didn't include it in the filing so he has everyone worked up on Fox News. John Ratcliffe, you showed him earlier. Kash Patel is the source of many of these false claims. They were both witnesses to John Durham and Kash Patel has known about this allegation going back to December of 2017 because he's the one who asked [cybersecurity lawyer] Michael Sussman about it. Michael Sussman was honest about it back in December 2017 and Kash Patel when he was an Intelligence Committee staffer, when he was working in the White House, when he was the chief of staff for [the Department of Defense] he did nothing about this because he knew that all Rodney Joffe was doing was trying to keep the White House safe from hackers. That's what this is about."

Durham has accused Sussman of lying to FBI investigators during a September 2016 meeting about Trump's possible links to Russia, and this latest filing centers around the tech executive's investigation of rumors that computers at Trump Tower were communicating with servers at Russia's Alfa Bank.

"The Durham investigation is in real trouble," Wheeler said. "One of the allegations in the indictment is that Sussman was coordinating with the Hillary [Clinton] campaign on these Alfa Bank allegations back in October. Sussman was, like, name the people. In October, Durham said, 'I don't have any people.' In November, he first interviewed a Hillary staffer, he hadn't actually investigated this. We also learned recently that even though Durham and [then-attorney general] Bill Barr flew to Italy to get the phones from Joseph Mifsud, if you remember, is that Italian who was talking to George Papadopoulos. He never walked across DOJ to get the phones from James Baker, who is the single witness to this conversation with Michael Sussman. He didn't find out that DOJ [inspector general] had two of the phones until January. Then, after he revealed that he had these phones that he should have looked for four years ago, he then had to disclose that he had been told about one of the phones back in 2018 but he didn't remember it anymore."

"That's not the only thing that Durham didn't do before charging Sussman," Wheeler added.

She listed other flaws in Durham's investigation, and she expects Sussman to file a motion to dismiss the indictment against him -- and she believes the special counsel filed his pretrial motion last week to get ahead of that move.

"Probably what last Friday's stunt was about for Durham was an attempt to preempt that, an attempt to pretend that this investigation isn't kind of post-hoc a discovery of things," Wheeler said. "For example, he didn't investigate what the FBI's relationship is with Rodney Joffe before he charged Michael Sussman. He only pulled the communications when Sussman said, 'Why don't you find out what kind of relationship the FBI has with Joffe.' He discovered there were thousands of communications, so Durham is very close to position where Sussman is going to have the opportunity to say, 'You didn't do an investigation before you charged me.'"
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
Donald Trump's family business will be charged with racketeering, a Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist predicted on CNN on Tuesday.

CNN's John Berman interviewed David Cay Johnston — one of the few journalists to obtain Trump's tax returns — following news that the accounting firm Mazars dropped Trump as a client.

"What happens if Mazars cooperates with investigators?" Berman asked. "Which, by all accounts, it does seem that they are."

"Well, Donald Bender, the Mazars accountant who prepares Trump's tax returns testified before the Manhattan grand jury and New York has this very unusual law, if you testify before the grand jury, you are granted immunity," Johnston explained. "That's not true at the federal level and in other states. So, he no longer is in concern personally for anything he may have done, from the Manhattan prosecutors."

"But, it does mean that Mazars is helping the prosecutors put together the, what I expect, will be a racketeering case. A New York state racketeering case against Trump, the Trump Organization, Allen Weisselberg and probably Donald's three older children," he said, referring to Donald Trump Jr., Ivanka Trump and Eric Trump.

New York's Enterprise Corruption and the Organized Crime Control Act, often known as "little RICO," is the state's adaption of the federal Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization Act (RICO) that is designed to go after organized crime.

The New York statute can carry prison terms of up to 25 years.

"Where do you think this ends for Donald Trump and the Trump Organization?" Berman asked.
 

Patooka

Contributor
Joined
Apr 5, 2004
Messages
5,334
Location
Sydney
Basic Beliefs
aaa
Despite all this dodgey shit coming into light, I still don't see Trump going to jail. Not because he's an entitled rich cunt (even thought he is) but I suspect, even in New York, the chances of finding 12 random Americans to form a jury and not a single one of them is a Trumptard to be infinitesimal. Depressing but also pretty accurate.
 

Elixir

Made in America
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
21,803
Location
Mountains
Basic Beliefs
English is complicated
Despite all this dodgey shit coming into light, I still don't see Trump going to jail. Not because he's an entitled rich cunt (even thought he is) but I suspect, even in New York, the chances of finding 12 random Americans to form a jury and not a single one of them is a Trumptard to be infinitesimal. Depressing but also pretty accurate.

I do believe you're right. The best we can hope for is that he is deemed an unfit (won't win) candidate by about half of the GQP leadershit, creating a tremendous kerfuffle and rift in the Party, discombobulating their fall campaigns and causing them to lose seats in November.
Other than that, and probably more likely to succeed, we can hope that Cheato gets hit by lightning or is Epsteined by his handlers or something.
It's interesting (to me, but I'm easily amused) to speculate about what happens if he keels over from whatever without warning. Would there be one massive winner-take-all cage match for Trump's political inheritance? Who if anyone will make the rules?
They do have an impressive roster of practiced, polished liars, but will the old guard prevail over the Matty & Marge show in the House? Will the Senate
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
Despite all this dodgey shit coming into light, I still don't see Trump going to jail. Not because he's an entitled rich cunt (even thought he is) but I suspect, even in New York, the chances of finding 12 random Americans to form a jury and not a single one of them is a Trumptard to be infinitesimal. Depressing but also pretty accurate.
I can see a Trump supporter choosing a guilty verdict. A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser would hopefully be excluded from the jury pool.
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
...even in New York, the chances of finding 12 random Americans to form a jury and not a single one of them is a Trumptard to be infinitesimal.
Well, it won't be 12 random New Yorkers on the jury.
Random people are in the pool that day, then there's a filtering process.
Like, ask if they donated money to Trump, ask if they've taken a selfie in a restricted building, ask who won the 2020 election, ask if they're vaccinated, ask if they'd take a booster in order to sit in the jury box....
 

Elixir

Made in America
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
21,803
Location
Mountains
Basic Beliefs
English is complicated
A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser would hopefully be excluded from the jury pool.

A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser will lie their Trumpsucking face off to save their Orange Jesus.
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser would hopefully be excluded from the jury pool.

A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser will lie their Trumpsucking face off to save their Orange Jesus.
I imagine it'll be like the J6-ers. Someone in their life will be willing to inform the court that 'Juror #3 is 'MAGAmyDAY' on Twitter,' if the prosecutor's research department missed it.
 

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2001
Messages
38,407
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
I think this will ultimately hamstring the Trump Org from doing future business. They already rely too much on outside US loans. The stuff coming out now is going to make it hard for other companies to want to work for them. The Trump financial legacy could be dying. None of his children have his charisma and none of them are smart enough to make this house of cards stay up, forget about actually making something.

So while Trump will likely never pay for his financial crimes, his crimes might keep him and his family from continuing on.

He owns monopolies, but has acquired so much debt to potentially wipe it all out.
 

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 28, 2000
Messages
20,712
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
Trump's accountants quit — in the midst of preparing his and Melania's taxes — after questioning 'discrepancies'
  • Accountants stopped preparing Donald and Melania Trump's taxes after questioning "discrepancies."
  • Mazars USA told the Trump Organization it had halted its relationship with him, court papers say.
  • The company is distancing itself from key evidence in a criminal probe into alleged financial fraud.
What will their argument be? That they were hoodwinked by Trump and his underlings?
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
On Tuesday evening, former President Donald J. Trump, rattled by news that his longtime accountants had declared that years of his financial statements were not reliable, issued a statement of self-defense with new claims about his wealth.

These, too, did not add up.

In a rambling emailed message, Mr. Trump referred to a “June 30, 2014 Statement of Financial Condition” prepared by the accounting firm, Mazars USA, showing that the year before his first presidential run his net worth had been $5.8 billion. But that is not what he said back then.

When he declared his candidacy in 2015, he produced what he called his “Summary of Net Worth as of June 30, 2014” with a very different number: $8.7 billion. A month later, he upped the ante, releasing a statement pronouncing that his “net worth is in excess of TEN BILLION DOLLARS.”

The shape-shifting valuations, even in the face of mounting legal peril with Mazars’ decision to sever ties and disavow its past financial statements, get to the core of a problem for Mr. Trump. He has spent a lifetime bending reality to his will, often making it up as he went along, inventing facts and figures to support his needs in the moment. In fact, in his Tuesday email he suggested the intangible value of the “Trump brand” was actually worth an extra $3 billion in 2014.
 

T.G.G. Moogly

Traditional Atheist
Joined
Mar 19, 2001
Messages
9,379
Location
PA USA
Basic Beliefs
egalitarian
Trump's accountants quit — in the midst of preparing his and Melania's taxes — after questioning 'discrepancies'
  • Accountants stopped preparing Donald and Melania Trump's taxes after questioning "discrepancies."
  • Mazars USA told the Trump Organization it had halted its relationship with him, court papers say.
  • The company is distancing itself from key evidence in a criminal probe into alleged financial fraud.
What will their argument be? That they were hoodwinked by Trump and his underlings?
Good question. They were willing to take the money but something changed their mind about continuing to take the money. They're obviously worried about being charged themselves and are starting their defense.
 

Elixir

Made in America
Joined
Sep 23, 2012
Messages
21,803
Location
Mountains
Basic Beliefs
English is complicated
Trump's accountants quit — in the midst of preparing his and Melania's taxes — after questioning 'discrepancies'
  • Accountants stopped preparing Donald and Melania Trump's taxes after questioning "discrepancies."
  • Mazars USA told the Trump Organization it had halted its relationship with him, court papers say.
  • The company is distancing itself from key evidence in a criminal probe into alleged financial fraud.
What will their argument be? That they were hoodwinked by Trump and his underlings?
Good question. They were willing to take the money but something changed their mind about continuing to take the money. They're obviously worried about being charged themselves and are starting their defense.
Right. If they're going to declare their past statements to be of no value, Donald should definitely get a full refund for whatever he paid them to make those worthless statements.
Assuming he didn't stiff them in the first place...
:eating_popcorn:
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
A New York state judge on Thursday ordered that former President Donald Trump and his two eldest children, Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump, testify under oath within 21 days, rejecting arguments by attorneys for the Trumps who sought to block or stay subpoenas from New York State Attorney General Letitia James.

The decision by Justice Arthur Engoron of the New York State Supreme Court came after two hours of at-times heated oral arguments, in which the Trumps' attorneys argued that James' probe constituted selective enforcement, "viewpoint discrimination" and could improperly mix the findings of a civil investigation with a separate criminal case which James is also a party to.

"In the final analysis," Justice Engoron wrote, "a State Attorney General commences investigating a business entity, uncovers copious evidence of possible financial fraud, and wants to question, under oath, several of the entities' principals, including its namesake. She has the clear right to do so."

The Trumps did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
What will their argument be? That they were hoodwinked by Trump and his underlings?
"We're not responsible for assessing the value of his holdings. ALL we do is stack the numbers HE GIVES US, then calculate his taxes, payroll, that sort of shit. It's HIS numbers that are the problem. Frankly, we're as shocked as you...."
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
I think i know what's next for Trump. Knives.

I believe Trump will make sure his kids testify before he does.
They loyally Fifth out 500-600 times.
Thanked, dismissed, their photo taken as they depart (talking heads for CNN discussing if they look shaken, for FOX discussing how smartly Ivanka dressed for the fishing expedition.
Trump enters the room.
And throws the lot of them under the bus.
He'll have a deal before he sits down, probably before the day.
It's always about him, and anyone else has started distancing themselves. All that's left are the Gang of Three.
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
I wonder if the Trump's testimony will be televised.
 

Artemus

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,203
Location
Bible Belt, USA
Basic Beliefs
Atheist and general cynic
The judge said it "would be a blatant dereliction of duty" for the AG not to investigate when dismissing the Trump attorney's claim that it was a personal vendetta. There must be some really incriminating documents.

ETA And yes, I understand that this is the civil case so technically "incriminating" doesn't apply.
 

lpetrich

Contributor
Joined
Jul 28, 2000
Messages
20,712
Location
Eugene, OR
Gender
Male
Basic Beliefs
Atheist
Donald Trump, Ivanka, and Donald Jr. ordered to comply with subpoenas from NY Attorney General
Citizen Donald Trump and his children Donald Trump Jr. and Ivanka Trump are being ordered to comply with subpoenas from New York Attorney General Leticia James. Trump and his family have three weeks to go under oath, and Trump himself must produce evidence and new documents within two weeks. MSNBC's Ari Melber explains what this means for the former president.
Trump's lawyers tried to argue that Trump's long-time accounting firm quitting was somehow a vindication of Trump.

But the judge had none of that, calling it "audacious" and "preposterous". Orwellian? George Orwell's 1984 featured a totalitarian state that liked to make words mean the opposite of their usual meanings: War is peace. Freedom is slavery. Ignorance is strength. Humpty Dumpty? In "Through the Looking Glass", the sequel to "Alice in Wonderland", that character says "When I use a word, it means just what I choose it to mean — neither more nor less."
 

Artemus

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,203
Location
Bible Belt, USA
Basic Beliefs
Atheist and general cynic
Li'l Donnie had a really bad week. In yet another court loss the judge said that Trump's speech to the rioters on Jan. 6 "is the essence of civil conspiracy."

The funny thing is, even if the rioters had been successful in stopping the certification, the Biden campaign would have sued and the courts would have confirmed Biden as president anyway. That's the great thing about having three branches of government. The mass stupidity of the Trumpers is surpassed only by the stupidity of Trump himself.
 
Last edited:

Swammerdami

Squadron Leader
Staff member
Joined
Dec 16, 2017
Messages
3,295
Location
Land of Smiles
Basic Beliefs
pseudo-deism
A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser would hopefully be excluded from the jury pool.

A full blown MAGA Trump ass kisser will lie their Trumpsucking face off to save their Orange Jesus.
I imagine it'll be like the J6-ers. Someone in their life will be willing to inform the court that 'Juror #3 is 'MAGAmyDAY' on Twitter,' if the prosecutor's research department missed it.

Aren't juror names kept very secret (except from close family members)? (Unless a juror goes out drinking and brags about it.) With 35% of Americans believing this criminal should be President, I think it will be tough to get "twelve of his peers" to convict. Especially since financial crimes are hard to prove and hard to understand.

Am I un-American? I have big misgivings about the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment AND the whole adversarial/jury justice system.

I think i know what's next for Trump. Knives.

I believe Trump will make sure his kids testify before he does.
They loyally Fifth out 500-600 times.
Thanked, dismissed, their photo taken as they depart (talking heads for CNN discussing if they look shaken, for FOX discussing how smartly Ivanka dressed for the fishing expedition.
Trump enters the room.
And throws the lot of them under the bus.
He'll have a deal before he sits down, probably before the day.
It's always about him, and anyone else has started distancing themselves. All that's left are the Gang of Three.
Gang of Three?

Even Trump voters realize that Eric and Junior are too stupid to run a criminal enterprise, I think. And Ivanka may be too smart to take the fall.

But who are the Three? :confused: Hints, please?
Breaking it into syllables? Bigger than a breadbox?
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...

Aren't juror names kept very secret (except from close family members)? (Unless a juror goes out drinking and brags about it.)
Yes, but they do publish sketches of the courtroom, including the jurors reacting to testimony.
And i figure the sudden silence of some of my relatives, coinciding with jury selection, might draw my attention. I am sure others will note if Billy Joe stops sending a weekly Metaphor- or Derec-type email.

Also, these people could not really handle thd lockdowns for The Plague. They're going to have difficulty if they are sequestered. I expect thrir true colors will shine on.

With 35% of Americans believing this criminal should be President, I think it will be tough to get "twelve of his peers" to convict. Especially since financial crimes are hard to prove and hard to understand.
And when that jury deliberates, if someone's objections to conviction are based on Hillary or Hunter, the foreman's going to slip a note to thge judge.

m I un-American? I have big misgivings about the 1st Amendment, the 2nd Amendment AND the whole adversarial/jury justice system.
Well, Jefferson had misgivings about the 1st.
And everyone only quotes part of the 2nd.
Nothing unAmerican about noting problems.
Gang of Three?

Even Trump voters realize that Eric and Junior are too stupid to run a criminal enterprise, I think. And Ivanka may be too smart to take the fall.
Ivanka, Junior, Kushner.
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
I was reminded of something today, that doesn't get near enough play.
In a criminal trial, taking the Fifth leaves the oprosecution with doing their own homework. You're innocent until they prove you guilty.

In a civil trial, taking the Fifth can be used against you. Given the chance to tell your side of the story, you say, instead, that details of your side of the story would lead to criminal prosecution...the jury is allowed to consider that.

So, you wonder why Eric's lawyer let him do that 500 times.... then realize Eric's lawyer pcertainly works for Trump, Sr. So, very likely, The Donald has already tossed a kid to the bus barn driveway....
 

Artemus

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,203
Location
Bible Belt, USA
Basic Beliefs
Atheist and general cynic
I was reminded of something today, that doesn't get near enough play.
In a criminal trial, taking the Fifth leaves the oprosecution with doing their own homework. You're innocent until they prove you guilty.

In a civil trial, taking the Fifth can be used against you. Given the chance to tell your side of the story, you say, instead, that details of your side of the story would lead to criminal prosecution...the jury is allowed to consider that.

So, you wonder why Eric's lawyer let him do that 500 times.... then realize Eric's lawyer pcertainly works for Trump, Sr. So, very likely, The Donald has already tossed a kid to the bus barn driveway....
A strong possibility. And the irony which I'm certain that he is unable to see is, he tried to win the election by getting an investigation of Hunter Biden opened.
 

Artemus

Veteran Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2002
Messages
1,203
Location
Bible Belt, USA
Basic Beliefs
Atheist and general cynic
I was reminded of something today, that doesn't get near enough play.
In a criminal trial, taking the Fifth leaves the oprosecution with doing their own homework. You're innocent until they prove you guilty.

In a civil trial, taking the Fifth can be used against you. Given the chance to tell your side of the story, you say, instead, that details of your side of the story would lead to criminal prosecution...the jury is allowed to consider that.

So, you wonder why Eric's lawyer let him do that 500 times.... then realize Eric's lawyer pcertainly works for Trump, Sr. So, very likely, The Donald has already tossed a kid to the bus barn driveway....
A strong possibility. And the irony of which I'm certain that he is unable to see is, he tried to win the election by getting an investigation of Hunter Biden opened.
 

bleubird

Veteran Member
Joined
Aug 19, 2002
Messages
1,365
Location
Alaska
Basic Beliefs
none

One more blow.
 

blastula

Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
8,485
Gender
Late for dinner
Basic Beliefs
Gnostic atheist

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
Maybe it's not straight-up dementia? Maybe Trump is playing a game? Not four-dimensional chess, but, I dunno, an RPG?

he released the following:
“I hope everyone is able to remember that it was me, as President of the United States, that got delinquent NATO members to start paying their dues, which amounted to hundreds of billions of dollars. There would be no NATO if I didn’t act strongly and swiftly. Also, it was me that got Ukraine the very effective antitank busters (Javelins) when the previous Administration was sending blankets. Let History so note!”
- Orange Menace in a statement on 28 Feb

Maybe he thinks he can cast Mass Illusion to get everyone to forget the actual ancient history of First Impeachment? Blackmailing Ukraine and making up absolute hogwash about NATO dues? Insisting we pay LESS towards NATO?
 

blastula

Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
8,485
Gender
Late for dinner
Basic Beliefs
Gnostic atheist
Maybe it's not straight-up dementia? Maybe Trump is playing a game? Not four-dimensional chess, but, I dunno, an RPG?

he released the following:
“I hope everyone is able to remember that it was me, as President of the United States, that got delinquent NATO members to start paying their dues, which amounted to hundreds of billions of dollars. There would be no NATO if I didn’t act strongly and swiftly. Also, it was me that got Ukraine the very effective antitank busters (Javelins) when the previous Administration was sending blankets. Let History so note!”
- Orange Menace in a statement on 28 Feb

Maybe he thinks he can cast Mass Illusion to get everyone to forget the actual ancient history of First Impeachment? Blackmailing Ukraine and making up absolute hogwash about NATO dues? Insisting we pay LESS towards NATO?

Of course, it's nonsense.

’I Alone Can Fix It’ book excerpt: Inside Trump’s Election Day and the birth of the ‘big lie’ - The Washington Post.

Esper had worked with Biden and his secretary of state in waiting, Antony Blinken, when he was a senior staffer on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. He had confidence that they were serious, stable people who cared deeply about shoring up national security. Esper couldn’t say the same about Trump. In fact, Trump had privately indicated that he would seek to withdraw from NATO and to blow up the U.S. alliance with South Korea, should he win reelection. When those alliances had come up in meetings with Esper and other top aides, some advisers warned Trump that shredding them before the election would be politically dangerous.

“Yeah, the second term,” Trump had said. “We’ll do it in the second term.”

Imagine if Trump had won, how he would be handling the war on Ukraine. He certainly wouldn't be assisting Ukraine with even sanctions. He'd probably be sending our troops to fight with Russia.
 

Jimmy Higgins

Contributor
Joined
Feb 1, 2001
Messages
38,407
Basic Beliefs
Calvinistic Atheist
We are being a bit harsh. After all, Trump ended street violence in Chicago within the first week in office.
 

Keith&Co.

Contributor
Joined
Apr 1, 2006
Messages
22,444
Location
Far Western Mass
Gender
Here.
Basic Beliefs
I'm here...
Maybe it's not straight-up dementia? Maybe Trump is playing a game? Not four-dimensional chess, but, I dunno, an RPG?

he released the following:
“I hope everyone is able to remember that it was me, as President of the United States, that got delinquent NATO members to start paying their dues, which amounted to hundreds of billions of dollars. There would be no NATO if I didn’t act strongly and swiftly. Also, it was me that got Ukraine the very effective antitank busters (Javelins) when the previous Administration was sending blankets. Let History so note!”
- Orange Menace in a statement on 28 Feb

Maybe he thinks he can cast Mass Illusion to get everyone to forget the actual ancient history of First Impeachment? Blackmailing Ukraine and making up absolute hogwash about NATO dues? Insisting we pay LESS towards NATO?

Of course, it's nonsense.

’I Alone Can Fix It’ book excerpt: Inside Trump’s Election Day and the birth of the ‘big lie’ - The Washington Post.


Imagine if Trump had won, how he would be handling the war on Ukraine. He certainly wouldn't be assisting Ukraine with even sanctions. He'd probably be sending our troops to fight with Russia.

I don't think we'd fight Ukrainians. But we might set up a peacemaker buffer zone, a barricade to prevent any arms or supplies to be moved into Ukraine.
And it would definitely be called 'hunter Biden's War,' not an invasion. A police action to fight 'the last administration's corruption.'
 

blastula

Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
8,485
Gender
Late for dinner
Basic Beliefs
Gnostic atheist
He thought Finland was in Russia.

 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist

In a new memoir, the former US attorney general William Barr says Donald Trump must not be the Republican candidate for president in 2024.

The man he served between 2019 and 2020, Barr writes, has “shown he has neither the temperament nor persuasive powers to provide the kind of positive leadership that is needed”.

Trump, Barr says, has surrounded himself with “sycophants” and “whack jobs from outside the government, who fed him a steady diet of comforting but unsupported conspiracy theories”.

Trump hinted again on Saturday that he intends to run in 2024. He did not immediately comment on Barr’s analysis.

Last summer, though, he called his former attorney general a “swamp creature” and a “Rino [Republican in Name Only] … afraid, weak and frankly … pathetic”.
 

blastula

Contributor
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
8,485
Gender
Late for dinner
Basic Beliefs
Gnostic atheist

In a new memoir, the former US attorney general William Barr says Donald Trump must not be the Republican candidate for president in 2024.

The man he served between 2019 and 2020, Barr writes, has “shown he has neither the temperament nor persuasive powers to provide the kind of positive leadership that is needed”.

Trump, Barr says, has surrounded himself with “sycophants” and “whack jobs from outside the government, who fed him a steady diet of comforting but unsupported conspiracy theories”.

Trump hinted again on Saturday that he intends to run in 2024. He did not immediately comment on Barr’s analysis.

Last summer, though, he called his former attorney general a “swamp creature” and a “Rino [Republican in Name Only] … afraid, weak and frankly … pathetic”.

Too late, asshole. And all that was already known before you signed on.

.
 

ZiprHead

Loony Running The Asylum
Staff member
Joined
Oct 23, 2002
Messages
33,035
Location
Frozen in Michigan
Gender
Old Fart
Basic Beliefs
Democratic Socialist Atheist
Last summer, though, he called his former attorney general a “swamp creature” and a “Rino [Republican in Name Only] … afraid, weak and frankly … pathetic”.
Trump only hires The Best People, but the people he fires couldn't find the drive-thru at a gas pump.
I think Barr is trying to refresh his tarnished and tattered reputation. Remember, everything Trump touches turns to shit. He should have known that going in.
 

steve_bank

Diabetic retinopathy and poor eyesight. Typos ...
Joined
Nov 10, 2017
Messages
11,107
Location
seattle
Basic Beliefs
secular-skeptic
The reporting is saying if Trump wants to run he will be the Republican candidate.

The Republicans are still kissing his butt and his followers believe what he says.

Like all his enterprises I expect his venture into social media will fail.

He will continue to descend into insanity and craziness divorced from reality.

IOW, a nut case.
 
Top Bottom